R
RebeccaJ
Guest
Yes.Didn’t a number of JS’s wives sign affidavits about their relations with JS in defense of polygamy being started by JS and not BY to counter what the RLDS claimed?
Yes.Didn’t a number of JS’s wives sign affidavits about their relations with JS in defense of polygamy being started by JS and not BY to counter what the RLDS claimed?
This is an interesting point you bring up about evidence. Without Peter the Church does not exist. I know this is off-topic, but this is important. Is there any historical evidence that Peter was ever in Rome? Before you go off speaking of the chair of Peter, the burial place of Peter, etc. Please just calmly research the topic. As for me and my wife, we left and never even did the research. It did not matter to us what she had said. We rest on faith, not what a historian says or what a book might print. Those things are irrelevant to our faith.Agreed, as long as we’re talking about Faith, and not doubt masked as “faith”, or, believing something for the sake of believing it and calling it “faith”.
The Catholic Church doesn’t ask us to do either of these things.
Yes, we have Faith in Jesus Christ and His Church, but we have evidence and experience that supports that Faith.
The Mormon view of a “great apostasy” is a conspiracy theory, not Faith. (That is my not so humble opinion.)
JeanMichel,This is an interesting point you bring up about evidence. Without Peter the Church does not exist. I know this is off-topic, but this is important. Is there any historical evidence that Peter was ever in Rome? Before you go off speaking of the chair of Peter, the burial place of Peter, etc. Please just calmly research the topic. As for me and my wife, we left and never even did the research. It did not matter to us what she had said. We rest on faith, not what a historian says or what a book might print. Those things are irrelevant to our faith.
Many years ago I was touring the Vatican museum. I had hired a personal guide for me and my wife and we were having a delightful time. She was absolutely superb in her descriptions of everything. At one point in the tour she was talking about Peter and out came this statement, “there is not historical evidence that Peter was ever in Rome.” Our mouths dropped to the floor. I was flabbergasted. Please look it up and share.
What is important is that nothing is more important than faith. Seeing miracles is forgotten as is seen in the example of ancient Israel in the desert. Blessed are you Simon Barjona for flesh and blood have not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in Heaven. Jesus clearly stated that personal faith through the witness of God the Holy Spirit is the ultimate foundation upon which to build faith. Evidence, history, etc. are good, but nothing is better than when the Holy Ghost bears witness of truth; this witness is the very foundation of faith.
And based upon this faith of Peter, Jesus built a Church, an organized Church, as the pillar and foundation of truth. It is where we find the “witness of God the Holy Spirit”.Blessed are you Simon Barjona for flesh and blood have not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in Heaven. Jesus clearly stated that personal faith through the witness of God the Holy Spirit is the ultimate foundation upon which to build faith.
God only knows who this personal “guide” was and what level of knowledge he or she possessed, not to mention the guide’s personal motivatons. Vatican guides do this for money and are not there for one’s spiritual edifiction. We know Peter was in Rome from scripture and outside sources. The real point is that it really doesn’t matter. The Church has chosen the Bishop of Rome as is its unifying leader based upon documented succession.I brought this up in RCIA, but yes, St. Peter’s bones were found to be under his altar in Rome…and yes, Scripture says he was in Rome.
There are alot of shady people at the Vatican…and I remember reading about John Paul II coming and being careful about who to trust.
These are the times of the Great Apostasy…the loss of faith.
Anyway, I am seeing Mormonism covering up more and more when it is public fact that Smith was very promiscuous.
I wonder if you even read my post…“show my cards”? What exactly did I say about faith that is different from what you said? Please write it exactly and then tell me how I showed my cards?JeanMichel,
I see you have chosen to show your cards, as it were.
It doesn’t matter to me, at all, really. Peter was in Rome, it is in the Bible. Do I care if he died there? No. It is evident he held primacy, and was given primacy by Jesus. This is found in the Bible. Christian history supports a Roman primacy.
I was not discounting the witness of the Holy Spirit, what I’m saying is, I see no reason to believe God would witness something as truth while providing evidence to the contrary. Why would God keep His Church going, strong, with many miracles, Saints and it’s mere existence at all, and then appear to some guy and say there isn’t anything there worth for you to bother with?
Not to mention, why would Jesus Christ establish a Church He knew was going to fail, and fail very quickly? His Church, the means by which the world has heard the Gospels message, by which people have believed and been baptized. What was the point of establishing a Church if not for God to bring people to Salvation?
Reason and faith are not opposed. God created us as rational creatures. He doesn’t seek to trick us into believing something that goes against the very nature He created us with, and then say to us if we cannot, we lack faith.
Faith and reason go hand in hand. Faith without reason leads to things like suicide bombers. Reason without faith leads to atheism.
Nothing have I ever said conflicts with the statements above, ever.And based upon this faith of Peter, Jesus built a Church, an organized Church, as the pillar and foundation of truth. It is where we find the “witness of God the Holy Spirit”.
Let’s be careful about our statements. Bones were found, it is our faith that tells us that the bones were Peter’s and no one else’s.I brought this up in RCIA, but yes, St. Peter’s bones were found to be under his altar in Rome…and yes, Scripture says he was in Rome.
There are alot of shady people at the Vatican…and I remember reading about John Paul II coming and being careful about who to trust.
These are the times of the Great Apostasy…the loss of faith.
Anyway, I am seeing Mormonism covering up more and more when it is public fact that Smith was very promiscuous.
Kathleen, did you do the research? When you make allegations of how important “facts” are and then “facts” don’t support some of our most crucial beliefs, what have you succeeded in doing? Apologetics is too important an activity to repeatedly make such gross errors. It is these type of errors that prevent others from easily joining the truth and causing problems for those in the Church to stay faithful. If you go back and read all my posts, the thing I try to teach is just stick to the truth of the Church, don’t attack the beliefs of others, but in teaching truth you allow the Holy Spirit to guide in due course and according to His Will for the individual. Christians are sources of peace in the world, we are supposed to bring people together through the acts of love that Christ taught us and many of the Saints demonstrated.I really do not understand how anyone would believe a tour guide over the Church.
I’m truly sorry if I misunderstood you, JeanMichel. There are a lot people who believe that its just them and the Holy Spirit and that is all that matters. I’m only trying to stress the importance of our Church and that it is where we find our God and having a relationship with Him, means having a relationship with His Church. No offense was intended. Please accept my apology.Nothing have I ever said conflicts with the statements above, ever.
Have you ever read “The Bones of St. Peter”. I don’t remember the author, off hand, but it contains incredible evidence that these really are the bones of St. Peter burried under the Basillica. Anyway, it’s worth reading if you’re interested.Let’s be careful about our statements. Bones were found, it is our faith that tells us that the bones were Peter’s and no one else’s.
There is peace between us. Our methods are different, but we speak from the same place.I’m truly sorry if I misunderstood you, JeanMichel. There are a lot people who believe that its just them and the Holy Spirit and that is all that matters. I’m only trying to stress the importance of our Church and that it is where we find our God and having a relationship with Him, means having a relationship with His Church. No offense was intended. Please accept my apology.
Hello JeanMichel,Kathleen, did you do the research? When you make allegations of how important “facts” are and then “facts” don’t support some of our most crucial beliefs, what have you succeeded in doing? Apologetics is too important an activity to repeatedly make such gross errors. It is these type of errors that prevent others from easily joining the truth and causing problems for those in the Church to stay faithful. If you go back and read all my posts, the thing I try to teach is just stick to the truth of the Church, don’t attack the beliefs of others, but in teaching truth you allow the Holy Spirit to guide in due course and according to His Will for the individual. Christians are sources of peace in the world, we are supposed to bring people together through the acts of love that Christ taught us and many of the Saints demonstrated.
Some of the PEOPLE in the Church went astray, BUT NOT THE CHURCH ITSELF!!! There is a huge difference there, whether you want to admit that or not.Oh the Jews DID err in their history! Ever read the Old Testament?
How often have the Jews gone astray? By worshipping idols and doing other abominable things in the sight of YHW?!
Why do you think YHW sent prophets? Why did He even punish His own people, if everything was OK?
I really can’t believe that the Catholic Church was any better in its history!
There certainly were also phases where it did go astray.
And I also don’t think that the Reformators acted without a reason… Neither did St. Francis of Assissi (as I have read a short comment on him here in CAF that he also protested against the Church. 'Though i am not familiar with this legend in depths.).
The LDS does not practice it and if you are a member and practice polygamy, see-ya, your excommunicated. The FLDS (another branch from Joseph Smith) still practices it and I think some other Fundamentalist groups. You can gurantee the LDS does not practice it but other branches do.I know that the Mormon religion no longer accepts polygamy, but obviously some still practice it. The show on TV, Sister Wives does nothing to help their cause, I’m sure. I watched several episodes back to back and I don’t even see them mentioning God at all. They mention the importance of family, but my goodness the poor women and all the emotional suffering they endure. Could someone explain the reasoning behind it and how this would be pleasing to God? Also, if the LDS now do not allow it, how did they come to that conclusion? Or is it only because it is against the law?