Mormon FAQ!

  • Thread starter Thread starter zerinus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Please don’t twist what I said to suit your needs. I said that keeping in mind that THIS IS A CATHOLIC FORUM. In the Forum rules, you can read Conduct Rules:
  1. Do not view the discussion area as a vehicle for single-mindedly promoting an agenda.
7 Non-Catholics are welcome to participate but must be respectful of the faith of the Catholics participating on the board.
How many times do I have to say this? I have also been respectful of the faith of the Catholics participating on this board. That is a lot more then I can say for a particular Catholic poster here. It appears to me that you are to quick to find fault with anything that I say or view my motives in a bad light. Why is that?
 
Sorry Mesenja, but you have chosen to debate with a bunch of guys whom I don’t normally debate with. If you want to debate with these folks, you will have to do it on your own. My advice to you is not to. These folks don’t deserve to be debated with, either by you or by me.
Code:
                                                         zerinus
Yes you are right Zerinus. I thought for a brief moment that I could have a proper dialogue with them but I appear to have been mistaken as evidenced by some of their recent posts to me. You challenge a statement by one poster and all of of a sudden my character is attacked and I have a hidden agenda. Besides for the most part all they can answer is by saying that Joseph Smith is a false prophet. It seems that is their stock answer for every question. You can see for yourself Zerinus the convoluted logic that they use.
 
How many times do I have to say this? I have also been respectful of the faith of the Catholics participating on this board. That is a lot more then I can say for a particular Catholic poster here. It appears to me that you are to quick to find fault with anything that I say or view my motives in a bad light. Why is that?
That is a very interesting tactic to take to keep from answering my question.
 
I will remember zerinus in my prayers.

I think you misunderstood my request. I have read all of the evidence that *supposedly supports *these writings as ancient scripture (the discussion of which could be a thread in itself.) I am of the belief that Joseph Smith took so long to produce the plates, etc, and subsequently the Book of Mormon, because he was making things up as he went along.The realization of this is one of the (many) reasons that made me resign my membership.

What I am asking for is actual verifiable proof.
So I guess that you won and Joseph Smith is a fraud? 😉 The ever growing evidence that supports our claim of the Book of Mormon being an ancient document makes it difficult to explain away as Joseph Smith making things up as he went along. BYU Anthropology Professor John Clark in his speech ‘Archaeology, Relics and Book of Mormon Belief’, said that “Practices, instruments of war and history in the Book of Mormon are in accordance with Meso-American ways,” If you are looking for direct evidence for the Book of Mormon there is none. I view direct evidence as evidence beyond any dispute that can be directly linked to the Book of Mormon. For me there does not have to be any such direct evidence as there is enough parallel evidence to support the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. This evidence does not prove that these artifacts were left by the Book of Mormon people. However Joseph Smith got so many evidences and events correct about the MesoAmerican culture such as metal plates in stone boxes,warfare, cities, cement that statistically it goes beyond any possibility of chance. For me I came to a point where I said how many lucky guesses can someone make before what he claims is true?
 
The only “evidence” ever produced for the factuality of the BOM has come from (where else?) mormon “scholars” usually from BYU. No outside authorities have ever attached any credibility to the BOM. There is simply no evidence for it. All the questions have been answered on these forums, mesenja…but none have been answered. Wishing will not make it so. Joseph Smith was a deeply flawed man who produced a deeply flawed “religion.”
Tell you what…Tell me what happened to all the iron and steel weapons, the human and horse bones and all the iron and steel armor left behind by the thousands of dead at the great battle at Hill Cumorah, give me a satisfactory answer and I will leave you alone. Deal? Or was it all policed up by the Lamanite Graves Registration?
 
Zerinus is a she???
Do you all remember that Zerinus disappeared some time ago, and another Mormon popped up right around the same time? I forgot the screen name used, but the attitude and all was very much the same. Z re-appeared right around the time #2 disappeared again.
Deja-vu!
So many of us have questions pending with Zerinus now, yet we’re all too insulting (or in my case incoherent) to merit answers.
 
…how many lucky guesses can someone make before what he claims is true?
Many of Joseph Smith’s ‘lucky guesses’ have been proven false but rather than speak in generalities I would like to hear your answers to certain particular questions I have.

Can you explain why the lds have in their possession the ‘seer stone’ used by Joseph Smith to translate the plates yet the plates themselves are not to be found? The Bible, as compiled by the Catholic Church, is backed by original documents and the truth of the statements made within the Bible unable to be refuted by those who wished otherwise. The BOM has only the word of Joseph Smith.
 
Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were both charged and convicted with the civil,not criminal offense of illegal banking and issuing unauthorized bank paper currency after the Kirtland Safety Society Anti-Banking Society failed in the financial crash of 1837. They were both fined $1,000 each, but Joseph Smith left Ohio for Missouri before an appeal was heard for fear of his life. The leaders of the Church made a sincere effort to solve the financial problems that the bank caused. They did start operations without a charter however later applied for a second charter. At the time there was considerable doubt as to the constitutionality of Ohio’s’ anti-banking laws. Also the legal failings were more the fault of poor legal advice on the part of lawyers then Joseph Smith. Joseph Smith returns to Kirtland and leaves with Sidney Rigdon to escape the risk of prison and mob action. Joseph Smith did not profit from the formation of the bank. Quite the opposite as he put more into stock save one other person and incurred more debt then anyone else. As late as 1843,he continued to work to settle his Kirtland debts even though now in Nauvoo he is beyond the reach of his creditors. This failing does not disqualify him for being a prophet. You are using a double standard as the history of your Popes shows a conduct that is much worse.
I wasn’t asking for proof of what I said. I was asking for you to discount Melanie Anne’s claim by showing proof.

Thanks for the history lesson though.
 
Sorry Mesenja, but you have chosen to debate with a bunch of guys whom I don’t normally debate with. If you want to debate with these folks, you will have to do it on your own. My advice to you is not to. These folks don’t deserve to be debated with, either by you or by me.

zerinus
Zerinus,
Does this mean that you are going to take down your blog and go away? Say it isn’t so.😦
 
So I guess that you won and Joseph Smith is a fraud? 😉 The ever growing evidence that supports our claim of the Book of Mormon being an ancient document makes it difficult to explain away as Joseph Smith making things up as he went along. BYU Anthropology Professor John Clark in his speech ‘Archaeology, Relics and Book of Mormon Belief’, said that “Practices, instruments of war and history in the Book of Mormon are in accordance with Meso-American ways,”
She is beyond naivite: her proof is a BYU !] professor’s assertion (she doesn’t provide his evidence, if any) that archeology of meso-america fits the accounts in the BoM.

That’s her ironclad proof!

Mercy me, let us pray for our mormon brothers and sisters!

Robert
 
So I guess that you won and Joseph Smith is a fraud? 😉 The ever growing evidence that supports our claim of the Book of Mormon being an ancient document makes it difficult to explain away as Joseph Smith making things up as he went along. BYU Anthropology Professor John Clark in his speech ‘Archaeology, Relics and Book of Mormon Belief’, said that “Practices, instruments of war and history in the Book of Mormon are in accordance with Meso-American ways,” If you are looking for direct evidence for the Book of Mormon there is none. I view direct evidence as evidence beyond any dispute that can be directly linked to the Book of Mormon. For me there does not have to be any such direct evidence as there is enough parallel evidence to support the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. This evidence does not prove that these artifacts were left by the Book of Mormon people. However Joseph Smith got so many evidences and events correct about the MesoAmerican culture such as metal plates in stone boxes,warfare, cities, cement that statistically it goes beyond any possibility of chance. For me I came to a point where I said how many lucky guesses can someone make before what he claims is true?
Here is the challenge: can you accept it?
  1. You must include at least 3000 grammatical and spelling errors, even if you use a secretary to transcribe your dictation. Now this is going to be really hard, because where are you going to find such an ignorant secretary?
Good luck on that one.
  1. Your “history” must be 531 pages long, and must use the phrase “and it came to pass” 3,856 times.
  2. You must come up with a good explanation as to why filler such as “and it came to pass” would be so frequently repeated if your history is supposed to have come from gold plates where space was at a premium.
  3. Once your book is published you are only allowed to change it 3500 times for grammatical and spelling errors and 500 times for doctrinal, historical or other substantive inconsistencies.
  4. Your “history” must replace the actual millions of inhabitants of the ancient Americas during this time period with fictitious nations, including one nation founded by refugees from the mythical tower of Babylon who came to the Americas on a barge with holes in the top and the bottom and two other nations founded by “Jews” who know next to nothing about Jewish dietary or religious practices. (I told you this was going to be harder than Nibley’s challenge.)
  5. You must describe the inhabitants of America and their religious, economic, political and social and cultural institutions in such way that they don’t in any way represent the religious, political, social and cultural institutions of the actual inhabitants of ancient America. Even make up some names of coins that were never used by the actual inhabitants of America.
Throw in some animals that are only in the Americas post-Columbus and make up some funny names of non-existent animals too, like Cureloms.
  1. Make sure you plagiarize from more than one section of the Bible, and from various other sources, so that your claim that many ancient authors contributed to the book can later be trumpeted by apologists.
  2. Make up a story about a dead guy coming to America and killing millions of inhabitants and burying cities in the ocean and under the earth. You must call him Jesus.
  3. Claim that your inconsistent and grammatically awkward prose (except for the plagiarized parts which are a little bit better written) is not fiction, but a true and sacred history.
  4. Include in your book 54 chapters dealing with wars that bear no resemblance to the actual wars that took place in the ancient Americas. Make sure that at least some of these wars include the nonsensical accounts of million man armies, ignoring logistical support for such a large army, and million man armies fighting to the last man and their bones and steel weapons disappearing from the face of the earth. Include 21 historical chapters which bear no resemblance to actual history, try and include some inconsistencies here too, like people reappearing in the narrative after they have already died.
  5. You must include 55 chapters on visions and prophesies. At least one of the “visions” must be an almost verbatim recital of a dream that some member of your family, preferably your father, told to you as a boy. Some of the prophesies must be plagiarized directly from the Bible, but others must be “prophecies” about things that have already happened between the time of the supposed prophesy and the present, so that you can show how accurate the “prophecies” of your book are. Except for the “prophecies” about events that have already taken place, which must be laden with details, all prophecies should be very vague. Never do anything stupid like prophesy that Christ will come in 1891, the civil war would start in the 1830’s or that people live on Venus or the moon and dress like Quakers, that would be quite a problem.
macgregorministries.org/mormons/bom_challenge.html
 
Zerinus is a she???
Do you all remember that Zerinus disappeared some time ago, and another Mormon popped up right around the same time? I forgot the screen name used, but the attitude and all was very much the same. Z re-appeared right around the time #2 disappeared again.
Deja-vu!
So many of us have questions pending with Zerinus now, yet we’re all too insulting (or in my case incoherent) to merit answers.
what questions do you have, maybe I can answer them, without insulting your intelligence, or offending your religion or belief system, even though i have done so in the past, to others. I do not know the history of the Mormons that well, so I will not answer those, but on their beliefs maybe I can, as long as it is a question on believing what is the truth. The problem we have as a people, is that we can’t really say what the pope did or Luther or Joseph, because we weren’t there, that is including the life of the Savior, we all follow the bible or records in hopes that they are correct, or translated correctly. We are at the mercy of the past historians and we have to agree that the one who writes history is going to write what he thinks is right or if you have a poor translator you are at his mercy and understanding of the language. That is why there are so many religions, all coming from one bible each claiming we are right in our thinking and you are wrong, or this is the truth or this is the truth and then we establish a name to the church to classify us, as a group. And yet many of us have questions, that our superiors cannot answer, because it is not written, therefore it does not exist, or it is the mystery we cannot tell. The real challenge is to except truth where ever it can be found, and be opened minded enough to embrace it. If you have a open mind and are logical in thinking, we can have a conversation that may lead to something worthy of life. I have read many questions on this forum, some I have answered, but those in question are not really looking for truth, but trying to secure their own belief in what they have, even if their faith is on shaky ground. I have read the Mormon blog because it is the only one besides the catholics, just for interest sake, because people want answers. If you are a seeker of truth and want answers that you can’t find, I would like you to share your thoughts with me and see where it goes. I am not interested in debate. You who want to debate are as the Jews who were only interested in hearing their own voices. For when they are learned they think they are wise but council not with their God, whom they know not of. The Jews were so harden in their hearts, that they did not see who the Messiah was in front of them. So let us reason together, and ponder the thoughts that may come between us. I will never take away from you, what you now believe, I will only add to it. But I will warn you the bible does not teach what others do not believe. I had a minister once tear out two pages of James from his bible, because it didn’t agree with his philosophy. REMEMBER philosophy is only what one thinks, or has reasoned to be true, because he cannot answer the reasoning it is not true. We all what to be the Savior of men, or convert men to our way of thinking, because by doing so we are comforted in thinking we must be right because look at all those million that believe me and are following me. But during the days of Noah only 8 were saved by water, the world was wrong Noah was right. And the eight that followed him. God bless
 
Hi,

I’m new to the forums here but I am a Catholic, so maybe that gives me a unique viewpoint. Sort of an outsider who is part of the ‘group’.

One of the main reasons for searching this forum out was to find a resource to use when fighting against anti-Catholic calumnies I have seen on other sites.

I believe that I was right in my belief that popular Catholic apologetics would be more logical and systematic and lacking in the hyperbole that I see most often from anti-Catholic polemicists. The never ending flow of vitriol and unsubstantiated tripe from those that follow Hislop and Chick gets tiresome, but what is often worse is how rude, demeaning and dismissive the posters and supporters can be.

Being a Catholic I thought that was ‘them’ and couldn’t be ‘us’. Well, it appears (and I could certainly be wrong or just not in the proper frame of mind to make a reasonable judgment) that people here are being just as snarky, snide, condescending and rude to LDS members as anti-Catholics have been to us on other forums.

I would invite active posters on this thread to go back and review their comments and make their own judgments.

Again, I’m new here and maybe I’m not seeing the ‘whole picture’. If so I apologize.

Eric
 
Hi,

I’m new to the forums here but I am a Catholic, so maybe that gives me a unique viewpoint. Sort of an outsider who is part of the ‘group’.

One of the main reasons for searching this forum out was to find a resource to use when fighting against anti-Catholic calumnies I have seen on other sites.

I believe that I was right in my belief that popular Catholic apologetics would be more logical and systematic and lacking in the hyperbole that I see most often from anti-Catholic polemicists. The never ending flow of vitriol and unsubstantiated tripe from those that follow Hislop and Chick gets tiresome, but what is often worse is how rude, demeaning and dismissive the posters and supporters can be.

Being a Catholic I thought that was ‘them’ and couldn’t be ‘us’. Well, it appears (and I could certainly be wrong or just not in the proper frame of mind to make a reasonable judgment) that people here are being just as snarky, snide, condescending and rude to LDS members as anti-Catholics have been to us on other forums.

I would invite active posters on this thread to go back and review their comments and make their own judgments.

Again, I’m new here and maybe I’m not seeing the ‘whole picture’. If so I apologize.

Eric
You are quite right of course; but one thing you should bear in mind is that the majority of the people who act in this way, and give the Catholic Church a bad name, are not true Catholics at all. They are Mormon apostates who have chosen Catholicism as a platform from which to launch attacks against Mormonism. But in reality they no more believe in Catholicism than they believe in Mormonism. They are a disgrace to Catholicism, and a blot on the character and good name of the Catholic Church. True Catholics are pretty decent and dignified individuals like yourself, and they are outraged by their kind of behavior. So bear in mind that they are not true representatives of Catholicism at all. One shouldn’t judge Catholics by their actions.

If you want to hang around this place, I will give you a tip. These folks are not the only ones who visit these boards. They shout the loudest, and make a lot of noise like they owned the place (and they are also easily identifiable). But they are not the only ones who come here. From time to time someone appears who is worth getting into a serious discussion with. The best policy is to ignore those, and respond only to these. Let them stew in their own venom. That is what I do. Unfortunately some LDS who come here are not aware of this, and engage these people in debate, which they shouldn’t, and that gives them an opportunity to vent their vitriol and venom. If they were ignored, they would soon melt away and disappear like the hoar frost before the rising sun, and be forgotten. LDS are not always as smart as they should be.

zerinus
 
I can see why you think this, but did you read over the entire thread?? Did you happen to look back at any other threads Zerinus has been involved in? I, for one, think you would get an entirely different picture.
You will find that there are many non Catholics on the boards with whom we can chat respectfully, and some Mormons have been involved in those chats.
Z has a style all his/her own.
 
Again, I’m new here and maybe I’m not seeing the ‘whole picture’. If so I apologize.

Eric
If you came here expecting to find saints, you won’t. But you are right that you are not seeing the whole picture. zerinus - and his alter ego mesenja - has levied the worst kind of insults, has talked against the Pope, and refused to have any kind of discussion unless he has set the groud rules and that includes reading ‘lectures’ at his blog. There are a few threads that he has been on - one got closed - check them out before you pass judgement on us.
 
You are quite right of course; but one thing you should bear in mind is that the majority of the people who act in this way, and give the Catholic Church a bad name, are not true Catholics at all. They are Mormon apostates who have chosen Catholicism as a platform from which to launch attacks against Mormonism. But in reality they no more believe in Catholicism than they believe in Mormonism. They are a disgrace to Catholicism, and a blot on the character and good name of the Catholic Church. True Catholics are pretty decent and dignified individuals like yourself, and they are outraged by their kind of behavior. So bear in mind that they are not true representatives of Catholicism at all. One shouldn’t judge Catholics by their actions.

If you want to hang around this place, I will give you a tip. These folks are not the only ones who visit these boards. They shout the loudest, and make a lot of noise like they owned the place (and they are also easily identifiable). But they are not the only ones who come here. From time to time someone appears who is worth getting into a serious discussion with. The best policy is to ignore those, and respond only to these. Let them stew in their own venom. That is what I do. Unfortunately some LDS who come here are not aware of this, and engage these people in debate, which they shouldn’t, and that gives them an opportunity to vent their vitriol and venom. If they were ignored, they would soon melt away and disappear like the hoar frost before the rising sun, and be forgotten. LDS are not always as smart as they should be.

zerinus
Can you name one Catholic on this board who you think has behaved as you see fit? Can you name one who has asked you a pointed question who you have answered?
If you think ignoring is the wisest course of action, let’s see how long you can actually do that yourself. You’ve engaged in many threads, only to fall back on this sort of nonsense when you cannot answer a given question.

You’ll jump right back into the next thread that piques your interest, forgetting all about your admonition to ignore.
 
just because someone is unwilling to accept mormon claims at face value doesn’t make them snarky or disrespectful. When the vitriol flies from zerinus and his cohorts it sometimes becomes necessary to speak frankly and boldly about the truth. He chooses to ignore those who do that capably as if everyone else will also follow suit and just accept solely on whose assertion that Mormonism is God’s religion and everyone else is a helpless apostate. those that disagree without strong arguments are mercilessly insulted and belittled.

the whole premise of this thread is in my opinion flawed. This is not the appropriate venue for advertising your personal blog. zerinus has no credentials as an LDS spokesperson or apologist and thus his blog is nothing more than unfounded assertions and personal speculation. using this an excuse to wave everyone’s questions with “I already answered that in my blog” is not apologetics nor even answers.

Mormonism is a cult that begins with the statement IN THEIR SCRIPTURES that all other churches are corrupt, their creeds an ABOMINATION in God’s sight and then teaches Satan’s first great lie as doctrine.(you shall become Gods…)
 
just because someone is unwilling to accept mormon claims at face value doesn’t make them snarky or disrespectful. When the vitriol flies from zerinus and his cohorts it sometimes becomes necessary to speak frankly and boldly about the truth. He chooses to ignore those who do that capably as if everyone else will also follow suit and just accept solely on whose assertion that Mormonism is God’s religion and everyone else is a helpless apostate. those that disagree without strong arguments are mercilessly insulted and belittled.

the whole premise of this thread is in my opinion flawed. This is not the appropriate venue for advertising your personal blog. zerinus has no credentials as an LDS spokesperson or apologist and thus his blog is nothing more than unfounded assertions and personal speculation. using this an excuse to wave everyone’s questions with “I already answered that in my blog” is not apologetics nor even answers.

Mormonism is a cult that begins with the statement IN THEIR SCRIPTURES that all other churches are corrupt, their creeds an ABOMINATION in God’s sight and then teaches Satan’s first great lie as doctrine.(you shall become Gods…)
Yes! Excellent post.👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top