Mormon temples compared to Catholic Basilicas and Cathedrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter PattyPryor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Animal sacrifice, as performed by ancient Israel, was done away after Jesus was crucified and resurrected. The animal sacrifices were meant to point man’s mind forward to the then future atonement of Christ. I am not aware of any Christian group who still practices this.
Actually, the animal sacrifices and all other Temple functions continued to be performed by the Jews, long after the Death and Resurrection of Jesus. They didn’t end until the Temple was finally destroyed by the Romans, circa 70(ish) AD (which Jesus prophesied). The Jews were still actively practicing their religious rites and rituals in the Temple, right up to that point in time.
 
That is a reasonable thought.

But scads of other very detailed information covering many subjects was recorded in the OT, preserved in oral tradition and commented upon extensively in countless volumes of Midrash and Talmud over many centuries (well before the printing press, btw).

So if the Jewish temple performed all of those uniquely LDS functions that you believe are and were central to the practice of the true faith, I would expect to see such mentioned in there somewhere.

That’s reasonable too, no?

Paul (formerly LDS, now happily Catholic)
Not only was the OT preserved by Christians and Jews, but the Jewish religion has also been in existence since that time. It’s not likely that they have lost anything of their own history, especially concerning the Temple rituals. They are very good about remembering all of their ancient traditions. If any of those LDS rituals were actually performed by the ancient Jews, I’m pretty sure they’d know about it. From what I understand, coming from Jewish sources, the Jews do not look very favorably on what the LDS church portrays as being ‘ancient rituals’, that they attribute to taking place in the ancient Jewish Temple.
 
And, no, Latter-day Saints do not proselytize minors without parent’s permission.
Oh yes they do, members of my family have had quite a problem with this. Over on MD&D (an LDS board) there are many tales of people who were converted as children behind their parents back. There may have been one poster over there who expressed being uncomfortable with that kind of behavior but everyone else thought it was just fine “the ends justify the means” or “all’s well that ends well” as far as they are concerned. One poster even described how a teenager was encouraged to sneak out of the house to attend LDS teen functions. They praised the teen for standing up for what he believed. Any adult who would encourage a child to sneak out of the house and lie about where they were going to be is despicable.

My family’s experience planted suspicion of LDS parents and children, reading over on MD&D solidified it and left me regarding LDS members as a threat.
 
Regarding Temples, Catholic Basilicas and Cathedrals:

I have been in a Cathedral or two. I actually have brass rubbings from when ‘they’ were still allowing people to do them. I ate my lunch at Stonehenge every day for four months, in the days when ‘they’ allowed anyone who wanted to wander around there do so. I walked through the ‘moot,’ just outside Salisbury.

I have been in a few, not many, but a few, places and buildings that people have considered sacred to their beliefs and their idea of God. I have found…as I do when I go to the Temple, that one generally gets out of the experience what one takes into it.

If one is going to go inside, determined to find fault and ‘think it looks like a hotel lobby,’ well…that’s what it is going to look like, and feel like. If one enters in with an understanding of the purpose of the place, and with an open heart and mind, one will get an entirely different impression.

For instance…Salisbury cathedral. Now I realize that Salisbury isn’t the grandest cathedral on the planet. However, it is beautiful, and I never went in without feeling the spirit of the people who worshiped there, who felt the spirit of God there; I loved going there.

Now, the building where I attend church isn’t much; LDS meeting houses are pretty pragmatic. No candles, altars, incense, magnificent paintings, stained glass windows; nothing like that. There is a place for the choir to sit, generally a pretty good organ (sometimes not) a lectern from which the members of the ward will speak, and pews…standard church pews, nothing special. There are no crosses, no crucifixes. No real pageantry.

But the spirit of God is there when we meet together, for those of us who enter into the meetings expecting the spirit of God to be there.

We are an odd people, I suppose. We hold our treasures close, and don’t expose our precious things to ridicule. We wear ‘liturgical’ garb…others wear their religious clothing on the outside where all can see who they are; it’s a statement of faith as well as a reminder. We wear ours next to our skins. Others have their pageantry in their everyday worship…or Sunday worship, whatever. We keep ours to our Temples, where the ritual and pageantry is every inch as rich and full of meaning than any mass I’ve ever seen…and we don’t talk about it outside the Temple walls.

I’m not saying that public display is bad, nor that our wish for privacy is good. It’s simply the way we are. You do it your way, we do it ours, and I think that we should all simply allow each other the grace to be who we are without criticizing the way the other guy ‘does’ it.

If our Temples look like ‘hotel lobbies,’ then it’s a good thing y’all don’t go there. If you are offended by our rich and PRIVATE, because we hold some things very sacred, (and yes, this was very much a part of the OT, where the 'Holy of Holys was so private and so sacred that the high priest officiating therein would attach a rope to his ankle so that, if anything happened to him, he could be dragged out by the rope. Nobody else was allowed in there. Talk about private!)

…and nobody ever wrote down what possible ordinances or practices took place there.

I think, personally, that the love of God shows in all the work and the beauty of the cathedrals; in the sacrifices of those who built them. The leaders who ordered them built might have had less than honorable motives, and some were even financed in shady ways, but the believers who actually built them had such faith, and such a love of God, that I think that permeates the buildings, along with the faith of those who worship now.

But tourists who just walk in…I wonder: how many of them feel the spirit of the folks who built these cathedrals? How many ignore the spirit of God and simply gawk at the knightly effigies, or the rose window, or see how many saints are being honored…and look…the rosary that lady is using is pretty neat. I wonder if I could get one at the store outside?

How many leave that cathedral disappointed because it didn’t 'live up to the hype?" How many go in having already made up their minds that the religion responsible for the building is stupid/wrong/silly…so of course any product of it is also stupid/wrong/silly, and so will look for…and find…stuff to criticize?

LDS Temples are special to us. They are beautiful. They are also, in many ways, beautiful in their own ways, each one. We pour all the pageantry, all the beauty, all the ritual in a Temple that we do not have in our ‘every day’ worship experience. It’s how we do things.

So I’ll make you all a deal.

I will continue to appreciate the spirit behind cathedrals, etc., and understand that even though I am not a Catholic I can still appreciate the faith of those that are, even when I find the doctrines to be very odd and strange to my way of thinking and life. I will appreciate the beauty and faith that is poured into cathedrals and churches.

As I do that, you go ahead and criticize, make fun of, and ridicule the things most precious and holy to us.

I figure that will be an easy deal to make, since it actually doesn’t involve anybody changing anything.
 
Hello, I would consult the Masonic rituals themselves to see what they portray their origins to be.

I am aware of Joseph Smith’s Masonic involvement and the timline of LDS temple ritual introduction.
So am I to understand that your belief, as stated earlier, that “Masonic ritual stems from ancient temple ritual, specifically the temple of Solomon, as the Freemasons themselves portray.” is based on what the Freemasons say themselves in their own rituals? Do you have any actual historical evidence to demonstrate that Masonic rituals are connected to what was going on in Solomon’s Temple? As another mentioned, Masons view this as allegorical, and not an actual connection to ancient Judaism.
 
If one wants to experience Christian temple ritual, in the same tradition of ancient Judaism, one should go to a Catholic Mass or Orthodox Divine Liturgy. There, you will experience many things that harken back to the tabernacle and Solomon’s temple, such as:

-a sacrificial priesthood offering sacrifice on behalf of the people (i.e. the Eucharistic sacrifice)
-water purification prior to service in the sacred space (as well as a separate priestly washing prior to service at the altar)
-the literal presence of God
-a perpetually burning flame symbolizing the presence of God
-celebration of sacred feast days at the temple
-the singing of psalms
-division of the sacred space into three major areas
-bread and wine offering
-a holy of holies
-ritual processions
-incense used in ritual
-use of flame in worship
-reading from the Old Testament writings
-etc

Temple worship was never lost. It has continued in a very real way in Catholic and Orthodox liturgical worship. The more I read about ancient Judaism, the more I am convinced of the authenticity of Catholicism as a direct fulfillment of it, and the less I see Mormonism as restoring anything that was really lost (including the temple).
 
Most of the modern day LDS temples do not have a Holy of Holies.
Only the older ones.

Even when I was LDS and had been thru the endowment ceremony I never saw the connection of LDS temples and the that of the OT. And the OT is very clear as to what was to go on in the temple. Nothing to guess at. Nothing hidden

The connection simply is not there. They are not alike.

That is just a factual statement of observation. Not criticism attached.
 
Within the Initiatory washing and anointing that occurs in the LDS temple, prior to the presentation of the Endowment proper, the temple worker says that the temple washing, anointing, and clothing ordinances were performed anciently, as we read in Exodus, then states Exodus 40:12-13:
**
12 And thou shalt bring Aaron and his sons unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and wash them with water.

13 And thou shalt put upon Aaron the holy garments, and anoint him, and sanctify him;…**

He/She then says that we do the same today, but that we are washed and anointed only symbolically.
 
If one is going to go inside, determined to find fault and ‘think it looks like a hotel lobby,’ well…that’s what it is going to look like, and feel like. If one enters in with an understanding of the purpose of the place, and with an open heart and mind, one will get an entirely different impression.
Why do you assume that comparing certain rooms in the temple to hotel lobbies is finding fault? Have you never been in the lobby of a fancy hotel? They are quite nice. Nice, comfortable couches and chairs. Beautiful tables and floral arrangements. A fancy chandelier. Kinda like a celestial room. I will say that every couch or chair I ever sat on in the celestial room of an LDS temple was quite comfortable.
40.png
dianaiad:
If our Temples look like ‘hotel lobbies,’ then it’s a good thing y’all don’t go there. If you are offended by our rich and PRIVATE, because we hold some things very sacred, (and yes, this was very much a part of the OT, where the 'Holy of Holys was so private and so sacred that the high priest officiating therein would attach a rope to his ankle so that, if anything happened to him, he could be dragged out by the rope. Nobody else was allowed in there. Talk about private!)
Why do you assume that a comparison to a fancy hotel lobby is offensive? It is a statement of observation. Fancy hotel lobbies are nice. The celestial rooms of LDS temples are also nice. My problem is that people have to pay 10% of their income to be considered “worthy” to go there. It has nothing to do with what the temple looks like or how Mormons feel there. There is nothing wrong with private, personal worship. However, it should not be shocking to LDS when non-LDS find what you do strange since religious worship with others at the majority of churches in our culture is done publically with no requirement of providing a monetary donation to attend.
40.png
dianaiad:
…and nobody ever wrote down what possible ordinances or practices took place there.
This is not true. Leviticus chapter 16 provides a detailed description of what the priest is supposed to do in the Holy of Holies on the Day of Atonement. No one was supposed to enter any other day. The priest sprinkled blood of the sacrificed animals (a bull and a goat) before the Ark of the Covenant and burned incense.
40.png
dianaiad:
So I’ll make you all a deal.

I will continue to appreciate the spirit behind cathedrals, etc., and understand that even though I am not a Catholic I can still appreciate the faith of those that are, even when I find the doctrines to be very odd and strange to my way of thinking and life. I will appreciate the beauty and faith that is poured into cathedrals and churches.

As I do that, you go ahead and criticize, make fun of, and ridicule the things most precious and holy to us.

I figure that will be an easy deal to make, since it actually doesn’t involve anybody changing anything.
I re-read through the entire thread and did not find anyone “making fun of” or “ridiculing” the LDS temple. Perhaps you can let us know which specific posts or sentences you thought were “making fun of” or “ridiculing” the LDS temple?

I think a better deal would be if we continue to use facts, LDS history, actual past and current LDS teachings and our own experiences in the LDS church or with LDS church members in discussing Mormonism and you can start not taking offense at any post that is truthful, particularly those from former Mormons.
 
But tourists who just walk in…I wonder: how many of them feel the spirit of the folks who built these cathedrals? How many ignore the spirit of God and simply gawk at the knightly effigies, or the rose window, or see how many saints are being honored…and look…the rosary that lady is using is pretty neat. I wonder if I could get one at the store outside?

How many leave that cathedral disappointed because it didn’t 'live up to the hype?" How many go in having already made up their minds that the religion responsible for the building is stupid/wrong/silly…so of course any product of it is also stupid/wrong/silly, and so will look for…and find…stuff to criticize?
We don’t worry over what tourists think. If we did, we’d close our churches.

We don’t, because our churches are a public work. They exist to bring all people to Christ. They don’t exist to keep people at bay until they “get it”.

At any rate, I can only ridicule my own experience at a Mormon temple. 😛 Which deserves to be ridiculed if you ask me. The general idea of a sacred space, to do what you like, doesn’t bother me at all. It is better that you live your faith in God, as you understand it, than not. But the claim that Mormon temples are a restoration of something lost, has no evidence going for it, and evidence against it. As already brought up in this thread.
 
I wonder what the reaction would be of a sincere worshiper in St. Peters of having someone say that it looked like a 'fancy hotel lobby?"

I too have seen some very fancy hotel lobbies. The decoration isn’t the point, is it?

A hotel lobby is not a bad place at all, but it’s purpose is very different from that of a place of worship, and comparing a place of worship to a hotel lobby, no matter how lavish the lobby, is an insult to the place of worship, no matter how plain the place of worship.

Defending a snide remark by claiming that 'Hotel Lobbies" are beautifully decorated and so are appropriate comparisons is, in my opinion, is an attempt to back pedal that isn’t working. In fact, it’s just digging deeper.

You may as well have compared a temple to a Las Vegas casino. They are beautifully decorated, too, and the insult would only be slightly more obvious.

We Mormons do not believe all the same things about God, our Heavenly Father, that you do. But we believe in Him. We don’t believe all the same things about Jesus that you do, but we believe in Him and accept Him as our Savior and the Savior of the world. We live our lives the best we can, deal with our neighbors the best we can, and though we are also human, we come up against people of other faiths who are equally ‘human,’ that is, imperfect.

We are all, simply, human; being Mormon or Catholic doesn’t change our basic makeups.

…and we all hold to the symbols of our precious beliefs, and should, rightly, expect others to at least respect the fact that we do believe, if they don’t respect the beliefs themselves.

For one thing, if your goal is to make the other guy ‘see the light,’ taking pot shots at what HE holds precious is counter productive. NOTHING cements any idea like opposition to it, and that goes double for religious beliefs.

I watched one of my sons start yelling at his sister for being clumsy and unable to ‘get’ the rules of a game that he and some friends were playing. She yelled back. They were in quite a row there for about two minutes, until one of his friends chimed in with a “yeah, you stupid girl, what are you doing messing up our game?” My son decked him, and he and his sister went swimming.

(yes, said son got into trouble for hitting his friend, that’s not the point)

The POINT is that the friend would have gotten a lot further with both son and daughter if he had simply helped daughter figure out the rules. As soon as he started criticizing, the brother, even though HE had been yelling just a second ago, did something about it…and that ‘something’ was not abandoning his sister and joining the critical group.

Does anybody see the point, here?
 
I wonder what the reaction would be of a sincere worshiper in St. Peters of having someone say that it looked like a 'fancy hotel lobby?"

I too have seen some very fancy hotel lobbies. The decoration isn’t the point, is it?

A hotel lobby is not a bad place at all, but it’s purpose is very different from that of a place of worship, and comparing a place of worship to a hotel lobby, no matter how lavish the lobby, is an insult to the place of worship, no matter how plain the place of worship.

Defending a snide remark by claiming that 'Hotel Lobbies" are beautifully decorated and so are appropriate comparisons is, in my opinion, is an attempt to back pedal that isn’t working. In fact, it’s just digging deeper.

You may as well have compared a temple to a Las Vegas casino. They are beautifully decorated, too, and the insult would only be slightly more obvious.

We Mormons do not believe all the same things about God, our Heavenly Father, that you do. But we believe in Him. We don’t believe all the same things about Jesus that you do, but we believe in Him and accept Him as our Savior and the Savior of the world. We live our lives the best we can, deal with our neighbors the best we can, and though we are also human, we come up against people of other faiths who are equally ‘human,’ that is, imperfect.

We are all, simply, human; being Mormon or Catholic doesn’t change our basic makeups.

…and we all hold to the symbols of our precious beliefs, and should, rightly, expect others to at least respect the fact that we do believe, if they don’t respect the beliefs themselves.

For one thing, if your goal is to make the other guy ‘see the light,’ taking pot shots at what HE holds precious is counter productive. NOTHING cements any idea like opposition to it, and that goes double for religious beliefs.

I watched one of my sons start yelling at his sister for being clumsy and unable to ‘get’ the rules of a game that he and some friends were playing. She yelled back. They were in quite a row there for about two minutes, until one of his friends chimed in with a “yeah, you stupid girl, what are you doing messing up our game?” My son decked him, and he and his sister went swimming.

(yes, said son got into trouble for hitting his friend, that’s not the point)

The POINT is that the friend would have gotten a lot further with both son and daughter if he had simply helped daughter figure out the rules. As soon as he started criticizing, the brother, even though HE had been yelling just a second ago, did something about it…and that ‘something’ was not abandoning his sister and joining the critical group.

Does anybody see the point, here?
Dunno Diana, I guess, depends on the lobby, but I think the comparison here has been to a NICE hotel. Not some seedy casino with brown shag carpet and tobacco-stained ceilings. Why try so hard to make posters here the bad guys/gals?

A nice hotel lobby is different than a cathedral. 🤷 Does that mean one decor is better than the other? There was a Mormon here who posted for a while who told me point blank the paintings in the Cathedral of the Madeleine were ugly. Well, I don’t find them ugly, but maybe I should have scolded him for punching my sister.
 
I wonder what the reaction would be of a sincere worshiper in St. Peters of having someone say that it looked like a 'fancy hotel lobby?"
If St. Peters was a room with nice couches, chairs, tables, floral arrangements and a chandelier, I would also say that it looked like a nice hotel lobby. But that’s not what St. Peters actually looks like.

There are plenty of Catholic churches that were built in the 70’s and 80’s that are “aesthetically challenged”. I have no problems stating such. Stating that the architecture is not beautiful or even ugly does not take away from what actually happens at Mass. That is what is beautiful. I am fortunate to attend a parish that has a new church that is modern but hearkens back to more traditional styles. It is quite lovely, unlike the old church, which was dark and ugly. There are many Catholics who lament the modern architecture of churches built in the 70’s and 80’s.

The older LDS temples are the most beautiful and unique because they have painted walls in the endowment rooms. I attended the Dallas temple growing up. I always thought that the Dallas temple was ugly, including when I attended the open house as a child. This was long before I questioned Mormonism.
40.png
dianaiad:
I too have seen some very fancy hotel lobbies. The decoration isn’t the point, is it?

A hotel lobby is not a bad place at all, but it’s purpose is very different from that of a place of worship, and comparing a place of worship to a hotel lobby, no matter how lavish the lobby, is an insult to the place of worship, no matter how plain the place of worship.

Defending a snide remark by claiming that 'Hotel Lobbies" are beautifully decorated and so are appropriate comparisons is, in my opinion, is an attempt to back pedal that isn’t working. In fact, it’s just digging deeper.
Funny that you say this because LDS temples do have a “front desk” where they check everyone’s temple recommend and allow patrons to enter and participate in LDS temple ordinances. This is similar to a hotel front desk that checks to make sure a guest has a reservation and then allows the guest to enter and use the facilities. Not that LDS temples and hotels have the same function. I agree on this point. Temple patrons and hotel guests do very different things. If you hadn’t continued to complain about my posts, I never would have thought of this. Maybe you need to stop digging.

The OP remarked on the appearance of the interior of LDS temples based on pictures she had seen. I was merely making an observation that when it comes to decor, she really hasn’t missed out on much because other than some of the older LDS temples in Utah, there is nothing unique about LDS temple decor. You are making a mountain out of a molehill.
40.png
dianaiad:
You may as well have compared a temple to a Las Vegas casino. They are beautifully decorated, too, and the insult would only be slightly more obvious.
But I didn’t, and you don’t need to fabricate any insult. I think you don’t like the fact that I made an observation on temple decor because you know I am a former Mormon. You have stated in other threads that you have a problem with former Mormons saying anything that can be remotely construed as critical of the LDS church. This says more about you than it does me.

The interesting thing is that you are all upset on my comment about LDS temple decor, but you had nothing to say about my stating that the LDS temple ceremonies are masonic in origin or that I found the veiling of my face dehumanizing.
40.png
dianaiad:
We Mormons do not believe all the same things about God, our Heavenly Father, that you do. But we believe in Him. We don’t believe all the same things about Jesus that you do, but we believe in Him and accept Him as our Savior and the Savior of the world. We live our lives the best we can, deal with our neighbors the best we can, and though we are also human, we come up against people of other faiths who are equally ‘human,’ that is, imperfect.

We are all, simply, human; being Mormon or Catholic doesn’t change our basic makeups.

…and we all hold to the symbols of our precious beliefs, and should, rightly, expect others to at least respect the fact that we do believe, if they don’t respect the beliefs themselves.

For one thing,** if your goal is to make the other guy ‘see the light**,’ taking pot shots at what HE holds precious is counter productive. NOTHING cements any idea like opposition to it, and that goes double for religious beliefs.

I watched one of my sons start yelling at his sister for being clumsy and unable to ‘get’ the rules of a game that he and some friends were playing. She yelled back. They were in quite a row there for about two minutes, until one of his friends chimed in with a “yeah, you stupid girl, what are you doing messing up our game?” My son decked him, and he and his sister went swimming.

(yes, said son got into trouble for hitting his friend, that’s not the point)

The POINT is that the friend would have gotten a lot further with both son and daughter if he had simply helped daughter figure out the rules. As soon as he started criticizing, the brother, even though HE had been yelling just a second ago, did something about it…and that ‘something’ was not abandoning his sister and joining the critical group.

Does anybody see the point, here?
No, I don’t see the point of your anecdote in relation to this thread. Please see the bolded part of your post. I have never stated that my goal in this forum is to help you or anyone else “see the light” and leave Mormonism. That is way, way above my pay grade. It’s the Holy Spirit that helps people see the light. Please don’t make up intentions that are not clearly stated.
 
Oh yes they do, members of my family have had quite a problem with this. Over on MD&D (an LDS board) there are many tales of people who were converted as children behind their parents back. There may have been one poster over there who expressed being uncomfortable with that kind of behavior but everyone else thought it was just fine “the ends justify the means” or “all’s well that ends well” as far as they are concerned. One poster even described how a teenager was encouraged to sneak out of the house to attend LDS teen functions. They praised the teen for standing up for what he believed. Any adult who would encourage a child to sneak out of the house and lie about where they were going to be is despicable.

My family’s experience planted suspicion of LDS parents and children, reading over on MD&D solidified it and left me regarding LDS members as a threat.
That’s a bummer. I was told as a missionary not to teach minors or invite them to church, etc without parent’s consent. In some places they actually require a paper signed by a parent before any teaching.

That said, I don’t prevent my son from talking about our faith at other’s houses, including insisting that we pray before Thanksgiving meal with the rest of my family who is not LDS. We just don’t, and wouldn’t, bring friends to church activities without consent. Seems dishonest to me. Too bad some do it.
 
So am I to understand that your belief, as stated earlier, that “Masonic ritual stems from ancient temple ritual, specifically the temple of Solomon, as the Freemasons themselves portray.” is based on what the Freemasons say themselves in their own rituals? Do you have any actual historical evidence to demonstrate that Masonic rituals are connected to what was going on in Solomon’s Temple? As another mentioned, Masons view this as allegorical, and not an actual connection to ancient Judaism.
I don’t know much about Masonic ritual besides what I have read.
 
Within the Initiatory washing and anointing that occurs in the LDS temple, prior to the presentation of the Endowment proper, the temple worker says that the temple washing, anointing, and clothing ordinances were performed anciently, as we read in Exodus, then states Exodus 40:12-13:
**
12 And thou shalt bring Aaron and his sons unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and wash them with water.

13 And thou shalt put upon Aaron the holy garments, and anoint him, and sanctify him;…**

He/She then says that we do the same today, but that we are washed and anointed only symbolically.
That’s right. The washing represents cleansing from sin through the atonement of Christ, and the anointing represents spiritual blessings, and the Holy Spirit poured out upon the individual. Whether the person has a bath-like washing or the ordinance is done symbolically, if done with divine authority the blessings are still received.
 
I don’t know much about Masonic ritual besides what I have read.
So what is it that you’ve read that makes you claim that Masonic ritual stems from ancient temple ritual? Is it only because the claim is made in Masonic rituals (which Masons themselves believe are allegorical)?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top