Mormons: When did the Great Apostasy occur?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inquiringperson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I participated in a link regarding this very topic of the Great Apostasy and when it occurred.

It is on page 13 now, with over 23,000 views and its numbers go up every day.

I prefer to spend my time now praying for Mormons.
 
Atheists make this same argument against Christianity. Why did Jesus wait around for a million years while the Pagan idolatry was going on, before he revealed himself?

That’s incorrect. Mormons recognize the reformation was a step in the right direction.
Space and time is not applicable to God. God is outside of time, thus years is important to creatures.The Reformation was in right direction? You call thousands of different denominations in the right-direction?
 
Space and time is not applicable to God. God is outside of time, thus years is important to creatures.The Reformation was in right direction? You call thousands of different denominations in the right-direction?
A step in the direction of apostasy, maybe.
 
Couga…

The link you want is in your own books…and writers up to the 1990’s.
I’ve been Mormon my entire life and I don’t know of any anti-Catholicism books. The Great Apostasy by Talmage is not an anti-Catholicism book. There is a debate between BH Roberts and Father van der Donckt that’s published into a book, but that’s hardly “anti-Catholic.”

I know when Catholics first settled in Utah Brigham Young lent our chapels to Catholics for their worship. Other than McConkie’s designation of the Catholic Church as the “great and abominable,” which he retracted, I can’t think of anything else.
But the writings of Joseph Smith and labelling all Christianity as corrupt, the doctrines, etc…who else is the inference to…as well as your teachings…but the Roman church. Mormons only use Protestant Bibles. Why won’t they use Catholic Bibles?
I don’t know. D&C says there’s a lot of good stuff in Catholic Bibles. I’ll start reading the uniquely Catholic books as soon as I’m done with the Protestant Bible.
 
Virtually no human society has ever been monotheistic. My point was that the One True God sent many prophets, not just one. As well, man’s first sin was the desire to “be like gods”.
Like Irenaeus said, the sin was disobedience, not the desire to become like gods.
Then the Lord God said, ‘See, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil
Knowing good and evil. That’s essential to our growth.

The “One True God” stood in the midst of a council of Gods (Ps 82). Elyon divied out the nations of the earth among the sons of God, and Israel was Yahweh’s portion (Deu 32:8-9).
 
Like Irenaeus said, the sin was disobedience, not the desire to become like gods.
But the disobedience was a result of the desire. The temptation presented to Adam and Eve was that they would “be like gods”. That was their desire and as a result they were disobedient.
 
But the disobedience was a result of the desire. The temptation presented to Adam and Eve was that they would “be like gods”. That was their desire and as a result they were disobedient.
But the desire itself isn’t sinful. I mean, wouldn’t *you *like to know right from wrong?
 
When did the Great Apostasy occur? I asked my friend, but he didn’t know (didn’t expect him to. We’re both teens).
The apostasy occurred in April 1844 when Joseph Smith rejected God as he revealed himself through Christ to his Church; the Catholic Church which is still here on earth teaching what Christ taught it.
 
Strange it is that the faith which teaches, as its foundation, the claim of a “great apostasy” by the Christian faith, simply cannot define what that apostasy is, or exactly when it began, mainly occurred, or finished occurring. Stranger yet that it relies on the bible, produced during or after such apostasy, as part of its core.

Pinning down the “great apostasy” is like trying to catch a greased pig.
 
Strange it is that the faith which teaches, as its foundation, the claim of a “great apostasy” by the Christian faith, simply cannot define what that apostasy is, or exactly when it began, mainly occurred, or finished occurring. Stranger yet that it relies on the bible, produced during or after such apostasy, as part of its core.

Pinning down the “great apostasy” is like trying to catch a greased pig.
There are a few succinct paragraphs and several article references that a student of this subject can find by reading the article on “Great Apostasy” in Wikipedia, which also includes more than a Latter-day Saints perspective on the subject. Those can be read by someone who believes this is not a subject that has been studied about or “defined”, and hopefully they will see that it is not such a mysterious topic after all.
 
Strange it is that the faith which teaches, as its foundation, the claim of a “great apostasy” by the Christian faith, simply cannot define what that apostasy is
A loss of authority and some truths.
, or exactly when it began, mainly occurred, or finished occurring. Stranger yet that it relies on the bible, produced during or after such apostasy, as part of its core.
It began some time after 200 AD and after the Bible was compiled.
 
“I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me”
Whose face was Joe actually gazing upon? The devil has also appeared as “a personage” - which is much more likely here, since we know that no one may look upon God’s face and live - at least of you believe God (Exodus 33:20).
said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: "they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof."
Not to be confused with Isaiah 29:13 "Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men"

Old Joe certainly knew who to paraphrase. But, he apparently did not test the spirits that appeared to him, as scripture tells him to do. Why test the spirits? We know that the devil quotes scripture when he feels the need (Matthew 4:1-11, Luke 4:1-13).
 
You would think that if the “Great Apostasy” ever actually occurred that there would be at least a gradual change in the teachings of the early Church. However, you do not see this at all! Their teaching remained the same as those from even the time when the apostles were still alive!
 
Strange it is that the faith which teaches, as its foundation, the claim of a “great apostasy” by the Christian faith, simply cannot define what that apostasy is, or exactly when it began, mainly occurred, or finished occurring. Stranger yet that it relies on the bible, produced during or after such apostasy, as part of its core.

Pinning down the “great apostasy” is like trying to catch a greased pig.
Somewhere along the line America ceased to be a God-fearing nation. When? What specific day? Really? Is that necessary to recognize that America has fallen from God’s grace?

I don’t think so. That does not change the obvious fact that America has lost her luster, now standing as a bulwark of freedom in protecting immoral conduct and even blessing the same as being on equal footing as living God’s laws. With the millions of abortions, the rampage of pornography headquartered in this nation, the blessing of homosexual acts on par with the sacred union of man and wife before God, there is no doubt that it’s true. But I would be hard pressed to give someone the date and time.
 
You would think that if the “Great Apostasy” ever actually occurred that there would be at least a gradual change in the teachings of the early Church. However, you do not see this at all! Their teaching remained the same as those from even the time when the apostles were still alive!
uhhh…
 
Hi, Bibiomomiac,

(I hope that you are a lover of the Bible, as am I.)

It’s a good question you’ve asked. (First, simply, Latter-day Saints don’t think or “assume their church to be the only ‘real’ Christian church”. “Authorized church with continuing revelation to guide its leaders in leading people to the ordinances and covenants centered in Jesus Christ that lead to exaltation through His grace and His shepherding influence” would be a way you could put it that would express the thinking.)

If you would like to understand the Latter-day Saints perspective about how it could be possible that God would inspire the writing of beautiful, wonderful hymns of praise by those who were no doubt experiencing His love and blessing in their lives, then perhaps it would help to think of a “truth source” with pure truth beaming across the universe and available to all. (God is no respecter of persons, right?)

As humble, prayerful people have sought truth and guidance in their lives from that “truth source”, then they have certainly been able to receive truths and guidance and blessings which are always promised through obeying those truths. That would include the inspiration to write beautiful hymns of praise and adoration. Those were “real Christians”, with real love for Christ and the real inspiration of Christ and the Holy Spirit.

I haven’t heard the term “dead churches” used in my church, nor do I believe that terminology for a second. An individual person can be “dead to Christ” by having experienced “spiritual death” through having rejected their conscience and rejected the influence of the Holy Spirit in their personal life, but that doesn’t mean they have belonged to a church that led them to that point. It means they weren’t paying attention, if their church used the truths from the Bible as the basis for teaching about living the gospel of Jesus Christ.

They can be spiritually alive and spiritually awakened as they read the Bible and live by its teachings, including seeking inspiration from God through humble prayer and their desires to have the love of God in their heart and to act on that love in how they serve the people around them.

Sorry for the long answer to a short question.🙂 Wishing you peace and a wonderful day.
Parker here is another thing that bothers me. Your first sentence. Now you said you do not believe that your Church is the only Church that has the fullness of the truth.

Now how can you belong to a Church that you do not feel is the Pilar of all Truth. Because here is why I am asking.

Jesus said there is only ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH. You are saying there are MANY. That right there goes against the word of God.:confused:

Now if there is only ONE truth and you do not believe that your Church is the ONLY Church that has the ONE truth, what is wrong with this picture?

We KNOW the Catholic Church is the ONE TRUE Church because we have all of the Sacraments. That is our proof! We not only know we have proof. Now you are saying you do not even agree that the Church is ONE and you are also saying you agree that your Church is not the ONLY. Do you see what I am saying?
 
Parker… Do you see what I am saying?
Hi, Rinnie,

I hope you are having a terrific day. I think you misunderstood my comment. (That happens).
My use of the word “authorized” was deliberate. I don’t view the word “real” as synonymous with “authorized”, since a person can be a “real Christian” in that they believe in Christ, love Him and adore Him and accept His atoning sacrifice as very real and personal for them, and belong to any of a number of “churches”.

I’ll explain more tonight, but I wanted you to not have such a basic misunderstanding of what I had written that you responded to. (Thanks, by the way, for responding.)

A wish of peace to you and your family.🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top