Everstruggling:
Yeah, that would convince me all right.
I would just LOVE, LOVE, LOVE to believe in a loving personal God. I have prayed to believe in a loving personal God. I don’t mean that I have prayed for a sign from God (though I have done that to; I mean that I have prayed for faith full stop.
I guess the fact that I don’t believe makes it impossible for my prayers to be answered (which frankly, seems a little unfair to me).
So my question is this: Why is God so unwilling to make himself known? :banghead:
All the miracles I have ever read or heard about have these problems with them:
(By the way, sorry if I offend anyone. That isn’t my intention. I can only give my impression)
- They are easily explained by natural processes
- They are impossible to verify
- They don’t really have any clear message. (For instance, the dancing sun in Medju… sorry my spelling’s terrible. I’m not even going to attempt it. But really, what does a bouncing sun mean? It’s hardly unequivocal.)
It wouldn’t really be hard for God to give an unequivical, supernatural, and clear sign. It wouldn’t even be hard for Him to give everyone a sign, but He doesn’t (or can’t). I just wonder why.
p.s. I wasn’t being sarcastic about the DNA thing, that really would be compelling evidence.
That’s just it, God IS willing to show everyone that He exists, that’s why these miraculous events happen fairly frequently. IF you visit Paris, the body of St Catherine is available for viewing, and just an hour or two away is the body of St. Bernadette in Nevers, France.
One of the promises of Medjugore is that several miraculous events will be available world wide (probably through satellite TV.)
BUT if you attitude is forever tainted by skepticism, you will never be open to the Truth. You have to ask yourself, at what point and with what evidence are you willing to accept the truth ? IF the answer is that there is no amount of physical evidence or scientifically examined proof, then you will never find the truth.
Even IF a third party scientist examines the evidence, will you accept their testimony on it ? One can always say it was a hoax and the so called scientist was paid off by the Church. Do you yourself have to make the scientific evaluation ?
Odds are, unless you have the credentials of a world renown scientist, most folks would not have access to these priceless treasures.
Contrary to what you may think, God does answer prayers of atheists. IF you pray for a personal revelation at one of these shrines, God will respond. Challenge God for a reply in prayer, and He will answer. IF He does not, you now have an excuse for not believing. But be honest with yourself, doesn’t the many miracles that God has already revealed to us have any weight in showing he does in fact exists ?
Is it likely that hundreds of folks if not thousands, who have claimed to have experienced miracles, are all lying ?
Personally, I have never heard of any unusal long term preservations other than the bodies of these saints. Dead bodies just don’t happen to smell like flowers after many years, that is a known fact. Ask any forensic scientist, and they will tell you it is absolultely impossible to preserve a dead body for more than a few days. Outside of a total deep freeze, decay sets in almost immediately.
At Emittsburg MD, and a replica of the Lourdes Shrine, a lady on impulse dipped her HIV positive child in the waters of a pond there, found out a couple weeks later that her baby was miraculously cured. That was her personal revelation, she was non-Catholic and subsequently converted.
It doesn’t take that much of a leap (in fact I find it no leap whatsoever), if you go and experience first hand, these miracles that are well over a hundred years old. IF it’s irrefutable evidence you need, here it is. It’s more unreasonable to deny it than it is to accept it.
wc