M
Mirdath
Guest
We obviously have both evaluated it and come to different conclusions. My qualifications are ‘having read and comprehended it’, which is, I understand, essentially the only prerequisite for having a valid opinion on matters of philosophy. What are yours?Out of interest what qualifies you to evaluate the work of one of the greatest philosophers in the past few centuries?
Indeed not, and a steak would be just as recognizable as a burger once it’s pureed and shoved up one’s nostril through a feeding tube. Please, let’s be clear: I object not to attempts to logically prove what is beyond logic (it can be a fun way to kill twenty minutes), but to the idea that force-feeding these proofs is the Way To Go to convince someone.Neither of us know the OP’s daughter, without knowing her and the way her mind works it is impossible to know what will or will not work, which of the various intellectual arguments will most appeal. That being the case it makes sense to try all of the possibilities, after all if someone has stopped eating it doesn’t matter if it’s cordon bleu cooking or a burger and chips that persuades them to eat again but that they start eating.
The two are not equivalent. I don’t necessarily deny the existence of God, I deny the provability of the divine!And from the sound of it she does want to be convinced anyway, she hasn’t said she denies the existence of God but that she is not sure.
There’s nothing wrong with that. Where the distinction must be drawn (to reuse a metaphor) is between providing food and force-feeding. Many people who have given advice in this thread seem not to have noticed that line all too well, and some have advocated merrily traipsing across it. ‘Do you love your child enough to make her hate you and your faith?’ – what kind of question is that?!As another poster has pointed out we don’t leave them to fend for their own food and clothing at this age, how much more should we seek to ensure they have the guidance which can lead them to the right path.