T
TweetyBird
Guest
I didn’t take the time to read through all pages of the thread, so I hope I’m not being repetitious. I am currently in the process of pursuing marriage convalidation. My (civil) husband had reservations about it but is now fully open to it. We will be starting the paperwork/marriage prep soon. He is a cradle Catholic and I became Catholic at age 13, though we’ve both been away from the Church for many years. My catechesis was very poor, and even if I had cared at the time, I did not know that a civil marriage between Catholics is considered invalid by the Church.
Anyway, I have been to confession a few times in the past couple of years (my reversion to the Church has been a long and slow process) and was NEVER refused absolution, even by three very orthodox priests. What was required was contrition and a firm desire of amendment - that is, I intended to remain chaste until the convalidation of the marriage. Of course, if you note the pregnancy ticker in my signature, you’ll see that I failed in that intention…at this point, I’m waiting to go to confession until just before the convalidation. I really don’t get why a person in this circumstance would be refused absolution unless they saw no sin in their situation, planned not to pursue convalidation, and stated no intention to remain chaste? I mean, both single and married people commit sins against chastity all the time. A lot of people struggle with the sin of self abuse, for example, and find themselves in the confessional reciting this same sin over and over. I would imagine they are not refused absolution unless the have no purpose of amendment?
At this point, I am waiting to go to confession until the eve of our convalidation, which will probably be in a few months or so. I will talk to my priest about whether I should continue to go to confession in the meantime…last time I confessed was Dec 06…
Anyway, I have been to confession a few times in the past couple of years (my reversion to the Church has been a long and slow process) and was NEVER refused absolution, even by three very orthodox priests. What was required was contrition and a firm desire of amendment - that is, I intended to remain chaste until the convalidation of the marriage. Of course, if you note the pregnancy ticker in my signature, you’ll see that I failed in that intention…at this point, I’m waiting to go to confession until just before the convalidation. I really don’t get why a person in this circumstance would be refused absolution unless they saw no sin in their situation, planned not to pursue convalidation, and stated no intention to remain chaste? I mean, both single and married people commit sins against chastity all the time. A lot of people struggle with the sin of self abuse, for example, and find themselves in the confessional reciting this same sin over and over. I would imagine they are not refused absolution unless the have no purpose of amendment?
At this point, I am waiting to go to confession until the eve of our convalidation, which will probably be in a few months or so. I will talk to my priest about whether I should continue to go to confession in the meantime…last time I confessed was Dec 06…