Nancy Pelosi mistates the Church's position

  • Thread starter Thread starter Confiteor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Misstating the Church’s teaching on abortion is NOT a crime and cannot be compared to people who abused children or who KNEW that children were being abused and did nothing.

Nancy was wrong, and she continues to be wrong, but it’s just not the same thing. Those were criminal acts.
an. 1371 The following are to be punished with a just penalty: 1/ in addition to the case mentioned in can. 1364, §1, a person who teaches a doctrine condemned by the Roman Pontiff or an ecumenical council or who obstinately rejects the doctrine mentioned in can. 750, §2 or in can. 752 and who does not retract after having been admonished by the Apostolic See or an ordinary;
2/ a person who otherwise does not obey a legitimate precept or prohibition of the Apostolic See, an ordinary, or a superior and who persists in disobedience after a warning.
 
The archdiocese of Chicago’s website also has a link to the bishops website’s statement on Nancy Pelosi. Now if we could get this message out to everyone.
 
Unfortunately, after this confession of ignorance, the statement continued by offering the quip that ‘many Catholics do not ascribe to that view.’

Look up Cafeteria Catholic and the picture looks a lot like Nancy Pelosi…but then it resembles about 16 members of congress that vote pro-abortion but call themselves Catholic. Unless the bishops do more than talk the scandals these people bring to everyone will continue and the Cafeteria Catholic will continue to flourish. I listen to someone speak that over turning Roe v Wade would not change anything and they might be true but to get a ship going in the right direction sometimes takes a start by beginning to make a course alteration.
 
Misstating the Church’s teaching on abortion is NOT a crime and cannot be compared to people who abused children or who KNEW that children were being abused and did nothing.

Nancy was wrong, and she continues to be wrong, but it’s just not the same thing. Those were criminal acts.
Supporting a procedure that kills life and then misstating the church’s teaching to justify your position is just as much a crime as someone who stands with a killer but doesn’t pull the trigger. Nancy comments only exacerbates the situation started by her original comment that she supports killing children.

Criminal act as dictated by the state versus criminal act against GOD and moral law…
 
Is it just me or have any of you noticed that when the bishops did not act fast enough with the scandal that hit the Church, everyone said they did not do anything fast enough. But when a politician says something on national television that misrepresents the teachings of the Church, then when the bishops correct this publicly, there are those who say that this should be handled in private,. Even though this misrepresentation of Church teaching could lead many to false conclusions and possible jeopardize their souls. Go figure…
I say this fully acknowledging the bishops should have acted faster and stricter than they did is the first instance.
Prayers & blessings
Deacon Ed B
People are almost impossible to please. I’m just as guilty of this as the next person.
 
Oops…had to add another smiley to my post. (this one: :rolleyes: )

I agree, even if it is the right thing for her to do, it would be political suicide.
You’re right. It would end her career. It would take an incredible amount of courage, and I don’t think she has it.
 
What is most important her career or her immortal soul?
We know what is most important but apparently Pelose is not too concered with her immortal soul. She does not believe that the Eucharist is the Body and Blood of Jesus she thinks that’s too much for The Church to have us believe. And we certainly know how she feels about abortion.
I don’t think she gives her immortal soul too much thought!
 
While I certainly disagree with Ms. Pelosi’s recent remarks and with her voting record re abortion, one must be very careful to separate a judgment of her words and actions as being incorrect, from a judgment regarding her ‘intention’ and speculating over whether she is ‘paying attention to her immortal soul’ etc. That sort of judgment is not ours to give.

We can, and should, note inaccuracies and even untruths spoken of the Catholic faith and address those. . .with firmness and also charity, even if charity means to continue to note the inaccuracies and untruths and not to ‘accept them’ or to ‘back down’, even when the person wails we’re being ‘unkind’. We’re not.

But we should not then put words into the other person’s mouth. . .or claim that we can ‘read’ her thoughts or know, without doubt, her intentions or her soul.

For when we do, we are opening ourselves up to judgments --and correct ones at that–of our own failures, of our own errors, our own lack of charity, our own ‘inaccuracy’, etc.

So let’s stick to the ‘facts’ and let speculation of Ms. Pelosi’s intentions and her ‘thoughts’ be kept ‘out of the equation’.
 
What is most important her career or her immortal soul?
Nancy Pelosi thinks her career is more important than her immortal soul. She’s wrong, but that’s clearly her opinion. Sadly, she’s not the first, nor will she be the last. 😦
 
Nancy is just two heart beats away from being the president of the USA. I pray we never find out how she would govern our country. Now, consider those who are worried about the current govenor of AK being just one heart beat away from the presidency. For me, no comparison, I’ll take the lovely, moral. mother of 5 any day!!! Sarah Palin is not Catholic.

Love and peace

Mom of 5
 
Nancy Pelosi thinks her career is more important than her immortal soul. She’s wrong, but that’s clearly her opinion. Sadly, she’s not the first, nor will she be the last. 😦
I am reminded of the scene in A Man for All Seasons where Thomas More chides the one who had just testified falsely against him. [Richrd Rich?] He note that the witness has a new post in Wales and says something to the effect: “For the whole world maybe, but for Wales???”
 
I am reminded of the scene in A Man for All Seasons where Thomas More chides the one who had just testified falsely against him. [Richrd Rich?] He note that the witness has a new post in Wales and says something to the effect: “For the whole world maybe, but for Wales???”
I was thinking about that too. 😦 G.K. Chesterton said that St. Thomas More was going to become more important in the coming centuries. I think he was right.

St. Thomas More, pray for us!
 
I’ll bet Tim Russert would’ve cited the Catechism right then and there for Ms. Pelosi.
Sadly, we’ll never know for sure how he would have responded. But even Tom Brokaw didn’t seem to be buying what Pelosi was saying. He pointed out that the Catholic Church does feel very strongly that life begins at the moment of conception.
 
Wouldn’t it be something if Tom Brokaw were so struck with this whole issue that he became Catholic himself and became a passionate crusader for the Faith?
 
Not surprising that you find a way to slam President Bush even though he has nothing to do with this thread:rolleyes: . As for Pelosi, I am ashamed that she throws around the “I’m a strong Catholic” line at every turn. The truth is, she is ignorant of what the Church teaches. I cringe everytime she speaks with “Catholic authority”. Really need that puking smilie for this one:( .
I don’t think she is ignorant. I’m sure she knows exactly what the Church teaches. But she doesn’t care. She is going to do what she wants, just like millions of other American Catholics, regardless of Church teaching. The worst part is that she is willing to lie about the teachings of the Church to the media in order to make her position look reasonable. Unfortunately, Ms. Pelosi occupies one of the highest offices in the land and thereby gets the media attention. But I’m willing to bet that if her local bishop were to call a press conference to publicly correct her and rebuke her for what she said, the press would come and it would most definitely make the nightly news. The question is whether that bishop has the guts to do it.

I would love to see our American bishops defend the faith more vigorously and publicly then they seem to do. It’s time these phony Catholic politicians were stripped of the ability to call themselves Catholic in the media. They are creating so much scandal for the Church in America and there seems to be almost no response by the bishops. It’s so frustrating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top