National Sunday Law Takes Affect!

[prodigal-sun]

I just have this one sincere question…

What will you all think when we are ALL forced to WORSHIP on ONE SPECIFIC DAY (Sunday as foretold by the Bible) and not be able to buy or sell unless we go to church on that SPECIFIC day?

Will you all realize then and only then that Bible prophecy has come true and that Sunday is the day that was replaced by the Roman Catholic church to replace the seventh day holy Sabbath?

Hey, just curious!

Well I would be against such a law as this as would the Catholic Church considering I try to go to mass seven days of the week!

Of course a law like this would never stand considering it goes against several exsisting constitutional laws.

So say you are a live during the second coming of our saviour and this law was never enacted would you then realize that your prohetess ellen white was not who she said she was!

Peace!

 

[JoeyWarren]

Now what as in NOW WHAT? Or Now what as in Now what in the world did I get banned for?

If you meant the latter, then it was for posting a anti-christ video, if you meant it in the first way, then that was my first time getting banned here.

sometimes I think you have the IQ of a chimpanzee.

YOU DID NOT GET BANNED!

YOU GOT SUSPENDED!

What part of that do you not understand?

Why did you get suspended?

 

[cestusdei]

I suspect for posting particularly vile anti-Catholic messages. This is something sda’s do frequently. I maintain my view that they utterly despise and hate Catholics. That has been my personal experience.

 

[RNRobert]

I suspect for posting particularly vile anti-Catholic messages. This is something sda’s do frequently. I maintain my view that they utterly despise and hate Catholics. That has been my personal experience.

Probably for posting gems like this:

Wouldn’t surprise me you are all drunk right now, sitting around yer pc’s trying yer best to twist and deny the truth so you can feel justified about eating yer next cancerous diseased filled, possible trichinosis infected pork chop’s or drinking yer next glass of wine filled with the Spirit of the devil.

What a waste of time.

So long Catholics!

 

[LilyM]

I’m sorry, but you are mistaken. Again (now I’ve asked thrice) quote to me the book/chapter/verse of the NT that says we must obey the Jewish dietary laws. In Acts 15 James tells the Gentile Christians to abstain from blood and meat sacrificed to idols. **NEVER **does he say ANYTHING about not eating pork.

The SDAs try to have it both ways. They say Jesus abolished the ceremonial law but not the Decalogue, but then say we must follow the dietary laws which are in the ‘ceremonial law.’ So, tell me, which is it?

How can you say that Jewish dietary laws still apply when GOD HIMSELF commanded (didn’t politely request, commanded) Peter in his dream at Cornelius’ house to ‘rise, kill and eat’ a whole mess of ritually unclean animals, doubtless including pork?

If SDA still applies old Jewish dietary laws they’re talking out their rears.

 

[servus]

Wouldn’t surprise me you are all drunk right now, sitting around yer pc’s trying yer best to twist and deny the truth so you can feel justified about eating yer next cancerous diseased filled, possible trichinosis infected pork chop’s or drinking yer next glass of wine filled with the Spirit of the devil.

What a waste of time.

So long Catholics!

Im boycotting goitalones forum until he apologizes. That was below the belt and I am sorry he said this. It disappoints me to hear this from an Adventist.

Pax,

servus

 

[Mommyof02green]

Im boycotting goitalones forum until he apologizes. That was below the belt and I am sorry he said this. It disappoints me to hear this from an Adventist.

Pax,

servus

That’s just an example of “unjust” judgment and “labeling” that is going around!

There are some forums that I don’t share that I’m Catholic, because the moment I do I get “labeled”; or there are preconceived ideas about what I am, what I believe, and how or who I worship. (It’s amazing what falsehoods of Catholicism that people will believe just because an elder or pastor of their church said it to be true.) Well I went to this Bible Study weekend and _____ said this is what Catholic’s do. I read this book or heard this speaker and they say this is what Catholic’s do. They’ll give more stock in that then what I a “practicing” Catholic has to say! It’s doesn’t matter…they will take the word of an ex-catholic or elder/pastor of their church that just happen to go to Catholic School over a “practicing” Catholic.

Some forums I just simply say “I’m Christian” I don’t mention what Church I go to other then I go to Church. If I share anything that the priest may of said, I say things like “the head pastor” or the “associate” said this today or that last Sunday. Some of them will say my pastor said similar things or I never thought it that way… hmmm, I think I can see your pastors point.

I’ll give my opinions on Scripture, I may even get some that may agree with that opinion, but the moment they hear I’m Catholic they will deny that we even have anything in common. They will deny that we shared the same opinion or even deny that they like anything that my pastor had to say.

It is sad when we cast “unjust” judgment or our follow Christians…It just goes to show how far away our walk with Christ really is (that’s just my take on it).

God Bless Servus!
Mommyof02green

 

[amills]

Mommyof02Green,

Your post is interesting in light of another thread called “SDA was kindof sneaky”

Your reasoning for not allowing yourself to be labelled as Catholic on other forums is the same reason many SDAs do not like to identify themselves. They prefer to tell others about their beliefs without predjudices as you have described and later tell them they are SDA.

This is just an observation. I am not saying you are wrong in not allowing yourself to be labeled but on the otherhand as noted in the other thread - do you think SDAs are wrong in not wanting to be labeled before presenting their view?

 

[Mommyof02green]

Mommyof02Green,

Your post is interesting in light of another thread called “SDA was kindof sneaky”

Your reasoning for not allowing yourself to be labelled as Catholic on other forums is the same reason many SDAs do not like to identify themselves. They prefer to tell others about their beliefs without predjudices as you have described and later tell them they are SDA.

This is just an observation. I am not saying you are wrong in not allowing yourself to be labeled but on the otherhand as noted in the other thread - do you think SDAs are wrong in not wanting to be labeled before presenting their view?

Yeah, but the difference is on the “forums” or in “life” I’m not selling wears, or books, or any other product. I’m just talking to them, sharing my opinions with them, and my faith with them.

I don’t go around telling everyone right of the bat my name is ________; I’m Catholic, Mother, Wife, and a Republican! (Or whatever labels I describe myself with… At most It’s just HI my name is ______.

Later it in conversation it may be Yes I’m a Christian; or Yes I believe there are Angels; Yes I believe that the Devil is real. Yes I believe that Heaven is real and Hell is real, etc. Again I’m not selling anything or tying to “earn” money for my church. I’m just sharing my faith.

Now if I was out to sell wears, or books, or anything else for my religious group then I would be up front about what my group is and what we do…. After all their money would help support my group or (Church).

That is what the other thread was about; it was about selling books, and the person not being up front about who the sales supported.

That is what the difference is in my opinion.

 

[amills]

You have a good point. You are right that in asking for someone’s money you need to be up front.

SDAs on the other hand many times send out liturature that does not identify themselves because of the predjudices. They want to present their point first. But I think we can appreciate their view point in light of what you have posted.

 

[Mommyof02green]

You have a good point. You are right that in asking for someone’s money you need to be up front.

SDAs on the other hand many times send out liturature that does not identify themselves because of the predjudices. They want to present their point first. But I think we can appreciate their view point in light of what you have posted.

Yes, however it is my opinion that even handing out “free” literature that somewhere on it there needs to be who gave out the literature. Some point of contact. Whose opinions those are or what church etc.

Again I think there is a difference in handing out or selling “literature” then there is in just “talking” to someone. If you are going to give someone something to read then you should tell them who you are or what Church you belong too.

Although, granted you are “reading” this….but it’s far from “literature”.
The internet is a wondrous place. I can share my thought as if I was “talking” to you.

God Bless!

 

[JoeyWarren]

Wouldn’t surprise me you are all drunk right now, sitting around yer pc’s trying yer best to twist and deny the truth so you can feel justified about eating yer next cancerous diseased filled, possible trichinosis infected pork chop’s or drinking yer next glass of wine filled with the Spirit of the devil.

Servus, Goitalone is not alone in this type of behavior. I’ve seen this from other SDAs in other forums as well. BobRyan is a good example over at another board. What I have seen so far it is the norm. The SDA’s at this unnamed forum are very vicious.

[/QUOTE]

 

[cestusdei]

Insulting pork! How low can an anti-Catholic go? I will rally to the defense of all pork products, it’s the other white meat. I’ll have another beer too while I’m at it.

 

[adventistnomore]

Insulting pork! How low can an anti-Catholic go? I will rally to the defense of all pork products, it’s the other white meat. I’ll have another beer too while I’m at it.

I’m Catholic and Vegetarian. Down with pork!

 

[Mommyof02green]

I’m Catholic and Vegetarian. Down with pork!

Insulting pork! How low can an anti-Catholic go? I will rally to the defense of all pork products, it’s the other white meat. I’ll have another beer too while I’m at it.

You all need to make some signs and protest!

I can see it now:

SIGNCatholics for pork! [/SIGN] SIGNCatholics anti-pork![/SIGN]

 

[saint24]

ACtually the Bible does reveal it: Rev 1:10 shows that like other contemporary literature, Sunday was considered the Lord’s Day. Further, scripture tells us to hold to the traditions that are both WRITTEN (scripture) and ORAL Teachings. The observance of the Lords day is an Oral teaching and is given just as much authority in scripture as the written teachings. We can also show that the Lords Day was being kept PRIOR to the death of the disciples.

Finally, no Christian is ever commanded to observe the Jewish Sabbath.

everyody read and heed,
Rom. 14:5-6: “One man regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 He who observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he does not eat, and gives thanks to God.”
worship him through your daily actions. it shouldn’t be a certain day.

 

[cestusdei]

I absolutely love pork! Pizza without some kind of pork on it? Heresy!

 

[goitalone]

…

 

[goitalone]

I am not going to be in Heaven and it dosent matter anyways.

Hope you all are.

Goodbye

 

[LilyM]

I am not going to be in Heaven and it dosent matter anyways.

Hope you all are.

Goodbye

So where do you think you’re going to end up?