B
Burdock
Guest
Well bitterhope has said c that she thinks I should have it removed.
You hadn’t elaborated beyond “medical issue” before, so that could have meant many things. There are tons if ladies with bleeding and other cycle problems. It is not wrong to treat the problems. I would suggest talking about alternatives with your dr because there are many who experience problems with IUD’s, but if it’s working for you, fine. No one is suggesting you should end up ill.So in the eyes of the church, I should have my coil removed, and abstain until through the menopause, end up anaemic and ill .
The then Pope BXVI once commented that condom use among male prostitutes to prevent the spead of disease could indicate a beginning step of moral responsibility in a person… but purely as a contraceptive, condom use doesn’t conform to Church teaching.thewanderer, maybe people did think that, but I think condoms should be allowed to be used sometimes if necessary. ?
And there you part ways with the Church. Unfortunately, so long as the Church wishes to be able to claim infallibility in its teachings, She cannot backtrack and all of a sudden claim that contraception used as contraception is now ok. To do so would undermine Her whole teaching authority and She would no longer be able to claim that She is the one true Church. That is why you have so many people telling you the Church will never change on this. It has become a part of authoritative Church teaching. If any authoritative Church teaching can be changed, then all of them can, and so there will no longer be any reason to follow anything but your own interpretation of the Bible. Does that make sense?thewanderer, maybe people did think that, but I think condoms should be allowed to be used sometimes if necessary. ?
Was it unreasonable of Christ to expect martyrdom of all our martyred brothers and sisters?bitterhope, it is totally unreasonable to be expected to possibly abstain until your menopause, sex is not the be all and end all in a marriage but it is a big part of it.
Why would you assume that?So I suppose yiu would say I shouldnt recieve the eucharist, and thst I should leave the church.
I’m gonna be honest, you sound really defensive about this as if you’ve had many people attack you in the past about it. I’m not going to sit around judging you and what you do, but I will do my best to help you see things the way I do if you are interested.So I suppose yiu would say I shouldnt recieve the eucharist, and thst I should leave the church.
No. Not having sex is a piece of cake compared to loosing my babies. Trust me, I’m without sex most of the time anyway. My husband is gone more than he’s home, and when he’s home I finally catch up on sleep. It’s not that hard. Only holding my babies after they were gone is so much harder. And still, I’ve been let off of the hook so much easier than many in this world. I can’t complain about much. I have so much more than many. Don’t live in Iraq and fear for my life. My babies have never known hunger. I have not gone to war. It’s really not that bad of a life.bitterhope, it is totally unreasonable to be expected to possibly abstain until your menopause, sex is not the be all and end all in a marriage but it is a big part of it.
You see it as unreasonable to abstain, yet the Church is the one obsessed with sexual matters.Im not suggesting that your life is bad, but I think the church is obsessed with sexual matters, I just dont see using condoms sinful.
Why must a married couple abstain? Even after you have several children, there is something wrong with sexual relations with your own spouse? The discussion about sex in marriage always seems to center on what the right way is to have sex, not the good of the couple and their already living children. I have a hard time accepting a teaching that is only about following a rule, not doing what is best for the people with whom the rule is concerned.You see it as unreasonable to abstain, yet the Church is the one obsessed with sexual matters.
1 Do not yearn for worthless children, or rejoice in wicked offspring.2 Even if they be many, do not rejoice in them if they do not have fear of the LORD. 3 Do not count on long life for them,or have any hope for their future. For one can be better than a thousand;rather die childless than have impious children! 4 Through one wise person a city can be peopled; but through a clan of rebels it becomes desolate.
You can’t really complain both that the Church is telling spouses to have a million kids and that the Church is telling spouses to abstain. Its mighty hard to follow both those commands at the same time.Why must a married couple abstain? Even after you have several children, there is something wrong with sexual relations with your own spouse? The discussion about sex in marriage always seems to center on what the right way is to have sex, not the good of the couple and their already living children. I have a hard time accepting a teaching that is only about following a rule, not doing what is best for the people with whom the rule is concerned.
If a couple can better provide for three or four children than seven or eight, **why should they conceive children they cannot provide for? **Why isn’t the discussion about what is best for families instead of what the best way is to have sex?
Sirach 16: 1-4
Actually there was contraception during biblical times.There was no knowledge of contraception in bible times, obviously there is a link between sex and children, but its a fact that many catholics have a problem with it. My priest when I was in Rica classes actually said that women cannot be expected to keep having children, he also said the church needs to have more compassion, I know that people will say the priest is wrong
I’m sorry your priest was not clear, but in a very real sense, he is correct. A woman is not made to continue to give birth her entire life. We do reach menopause at some point. I am at that point (just beginning.) After 10 children born and two lost, I am coming to the realization that my days of child bearing may be over. It is a beautiful feeling to know I followed God’s will in my child bearing until the end! Deo Gratias! What a gift he has given me in being able to follow His Will.History further illuminates the Church’s position on this subject. Anthropological studies show that means of contraception existed in antiquity. Medical papyri described various contraceptive methods used in China in the year 2700 BC and in Egypt in the year 1850 BC. Soranos (AD 98-139), a Greek physician from Ephesus, described seventeen medically approved methods of contraception. Also at this time, abortion and infanticide were not uncommon practices in the Roman Empire.
I think robbing a bank would put me on easy street too but I can’t do that either. Right is right and wrong is wrong. Your choice, but remember you have to pay the consequences. You might as well give up on trying to tell the Church what to teach. We’re not God even tho we like to think we can tell him how to run HIS creation. The sooner we start doing things ‘right’, the better off we will all be. Remember Nineva!!! God Bless, Memawthewanderer, maybe people did think that, but I think condoms should be allowed to be used sometimes if necessary. ?