OK, I’ve got to stay relevant to the news story. Here it is.
The thread morphs into abortion, because it shows that there is something terribly askew in the whole story of the need for these warnings about something being evil, because if the warnings were for that reason, we would have warnings about things that are genuinely intrinsically evil. But we don’t have such warnings, so why, then, do we have tobacco warnings?
It is another case of substitutionary morality, or, if you prefer, call it compensatory ethics. It makes the immoral feel better about themselves, as though you can’t call them bad people, because, hey, they’re against tobacco. They’re probably against eating animals, and lighting with incandescent lamps, also. They substitute false morality for genuine morality, substitute things that are morally neutral, so they can keep the sins that they really love, and assuage their guilt about doing those things.
Now that we’ve used abortion to morph the news story into some real meaning, how about if I suggest, in addition to warnings about abortion, that we include a warning on packages of condoms stating, “Gay sex can kill you”. Include some photos of sores and cancers from STDs. Naw, we can’t do that. Illicit sexual behaviors are our favorite sins. Warnings would remind us they’re sins.