G
gamewell45
Guest
Scott; i’m glad that it can be proven and demonstrated to be true. How’s that?Again. Its not about what I believe, but what can be proven and demonstrated to be true.
Scott; i’m glad that it can be proven and demonstrated to be true. How’s that?Again. Its not about what I believe, but what can be proven and demonstrated to be true.
Scott; i’m glad that it can be proven and demonstrated to be true. How’s that?![]()
All paths? Wow that must mean everyone gets in. I didn’t know that and still don’t know that to be the case. And neither is that what I said.So, all paths lead to heaven then, if everything is subject to our own private interpretation. Just builda case for yourself, pick out the pieces of Scripture you like that fit the model and POOF, instant salvation! Awesome. I wonder if Jesus really even needed to die?
Gamewell, I once had an Episcopalian priest tell me the reason confirmed Catholics can be received (without the need to be re-confirmed) into TEC was because both Catholics and Episcopalians are confirmed in the apostolic succession of bishops. Now I know Catholics according to their faith don’t believe Episcopalian bishops are in apostolic succession. But if Episcopalians believe your bishops are in apostolic succession, then does that mean you can trace and demonstrate too according to your beliefs?Scott; i’m glad that it can be proven and demonstrated to be true. How’s that?![]()
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_ParkerThe Roman Catholic Church has asserted that the form of consecration used was insufficient to make a bishop, and therefore represented a break in the Apostolic Succession, but the Church of England has rejected this, arguing that the form of words used made no difference to the substance or validity of the act.
CMatt25, you raise a very good question; I"ve been told before that we do have apostolic succession by one of my Priests, but to be honest I do not recall the specifics of it however this Sunday I’ll see if I can take him aside and ask the question again of him.Gamewell, I once had an Episcopalian priest tell me the reason confirmed Catholics can be received (without the need to be re-confirmed) into TEC was because both Catholics and Episcopalians are confirmed in the apostolic succession of bishops. Now I know Catholics according to their faith don’t believe Episcopalian bishops are in apostolic succession. But if Episcopalians believe your bishops are in apostolic succession, then does that mean you can trace and demonstrate too according to your beliefs?
Anglicans believe that they have apostolic succession. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_SuccessionCMatt25, you raise a very good question; I"ve been told before that we do have apostolic succession by one of my Priests, but to be honest I do not recall the specifics of it however this Sunday I’ll see if I can take him aside and ask the question again of him.
I was Eastern Orthodox. They don’t question the validity of succession. They question the primacy of the Pope as “first among equals”. They interpret it as a place of honor rather than a place of authority.Anglicans believe that they have apostolic succession. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_Succession
Eastern Orthodox, except for the Russian Orthodox, generally may not accept the validity of apostolic succession in the Roman Catholic Church.
Yes, the Russian Orthodox are officially the most curmudgeonly of the Orthodox.Anglicans believe that they have apostolic succession. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_Succession
Eastern Orthodox, except for the Russian Orthodox, generally may not accept the validity of apostolic succession in the Roman Catholic Church.
the King of England had already married his brother’s wife. his brother had passed away.No, you don’t take “Holy Communion” every Sunday.
Your church has exchanged the truth of God for the wishes of a King of England who wanted to marry his brother’s wife. Since then, your church has divided into several sects. Each one following there own dogma as they see fit: ordination of women, open acceptance of homosexual and lesbian practice, even the ordination of an openly practicing lesbian “bishop.”
These are all grave sins in the catholic church. The church that Christ himself gave to St. Peter directly, which includes all the sacraments of that church. Without apostolic secession, there are no valid sacraments.
You can pretend all you wish that you are receiving “Holy Communion” every Sunday, but that does not make it so.
Well said.History happened. The Reformation happened and probably would have happened sooner or later. You follow the teachings of the Catholic church and others don’t. That is why they are protestant.
Well said.According to the doctrine of the Episcopal church, they do receive Holy Communion every Sunday. History happened. The Reformation happened and probably would have happened sooner or later. You follow the teachings of the Catholic church and others don’t. That is why they are protestant.
“He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.” Luke 10:16Well said.
the Protestants don’t reject Jesus.“He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.” Luke 10:16
My general take on Protestantism.
7 Sorrows, I agree with you that Protestants do not reject Jesus.the Protestants don’t reject Jesus.
By proxy they do by rejecting the authority of Apostolic succession. That is what the passage is about.the Protestants don’t reject Jesus.
Protestants don’t fully accept Jesus. If they did they would be in full communion with His Church.the Protestants don’t reject Jesus.
what alot of rot!Protestants don’t fully accept Jesus. If they did they would be in full communion with His Church.