New York senator: ‘my priest embraced me’ after voting for gay ‘marriage’

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Abyssinia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you really believe that the Vatican is unaware of this situation? I think there is more going on here than “lack of spiritual leadership”. I’m an outsider, but clearly the Vatican tolerates what you consider divergence from orthodoxy if it has reason to do so.
The good people of Rochester have suffered greatly due to this bishop’s lack of spiritual leadership. As someone previously noted, there is a whole website devoted to the lack of orthodoxy in the diocese of Rochester:

www.cleansingfiredor.com

I have close family that hails from there. It’s not fun living there if you’re an orthodox Catholic.
 
Do you really believe that the Vatican is unaware of this situation? I think there is more going on here than “lack of spiritual leadership”. I’m an outsider, but clearly the Vatican tolerates what you consider divergence from orthodoxy if it has reason to do so.
The Vatican is completely aware of the situation. However, these things may not move as fast as one would like…

If you look up Spirtus Christi and Far. James Callan, it is alledged that the Vatican eventually had to step in and put pressure on the local bishop to take action.
 
I agree that there’s more to this than lack of spiritual leadership. And I think the Vatican does know but may be worried about further schism taking place beyond what has happened already.
 
Do you really believe that the Vatican is unaware of this situation? I think there is more going on here than “lack of spiritual leadership”. I’m an outsider, but clearly the Vatican tolerates what you consider divergence from orthodoxy if it has reason to do so.
This is quite an accusation. There are always going to be traitors in the Church just like in the times of Jesus. The Church cannot accept such a sin. I can understand those who don’t have the promise of Christ to go that the route but not the Church Jesus Himself owns. I resent your statement.
 
This is quite an accusation. There are always going to be traitors in the Church just like in the times of Jesus. The Church cannot accept such a sin. I can understand those who don’t have the promise of Christ to go that the route but not the Church Jesus Himself owns. I resent your statement.
I certainly did not mean to offend, but even to me, an interested non-Catholic, it has been apparent for a long time that the diocese of Rochester has been considered less than orthodox by many commentators. Since the Vatican has not chosen to intervene in any public way, we may at least speculate that they have their reasons. My statement was not an accusation, mearly an observation.

Oddly enough, the diocese of Rochester in the Episcopal Church is considered one of the more conservative ones. Go figure.
 
Since the Vatican has not chosen to intervene in any public way, we may at least speculate that they have their reasons.
Or, “we may speculate” that the Vatican has other priorities, other fires to put out, or is intervenng in a private way.
🙂
 
Spiritus Christi is not a Catholic church under the bishop. It is a church which broke away from the bishop in 1998.

cleansingfiredor.com/2011/05/here-a-priestess-there-a-priestess/

We have such a church in schism in St. Louis. When then Archbishop Burke tried to reign them in, he was publicly crucified by the press and liberal Catholics.

People can claim to be what they want. I can’t for the life of me understand why they want to be called “Catholic” if they don’t want to obey the Catholic Church. :confused::confused:
 
Or, “we may speculate” that the Vatican has other priorities, other fires to put out, or is intervenng in a private way.
🙂
I think we are saying the same thing in slightly different ways. I did not mean to suggest that the Vatican willingly tolerates or encourages divergence from orthodoxy.
 
I certainly did not mean to offend, but even to me, an interested non-Catholic, it has been apparent for a long time that the diocese of Rochester has been considered less than orthodox by many commentators. Since the Vatican has not chosen to intervene in any public way, we may at least speculate that they have their reasons. My statement was not an accusation, mearly an observation.

Oddly enough, the diocese of Rochester in the Episcopal Church is considered one of the more conservative ones. Go figure.
This is an opinon and not the Truth to say that this parish is conservative. Yet, what is conservative? who says It?

The problem has been since the VII, many leaders in the Church became disobedient to the holy father. There is nothing they can do about it but just teach. Those who are disobedient to the Church are those who are in most trouble. The are the shame of the Church. IN any instance our Lord Jesus will deal with them just like God dealt with our ancestrals the Jews.
 
Spiritus Christi is not a Catholic church under the bishop. It is a church which broke away from the bishop in 1998.

cleansingfiredor.com/2011/05/here-a-priestess-there-a-priestess/

We have such a church in schism in St. Louis. When then Archbishop Burke tried to reign them in, he was publicly crucified by the press and liberal Catholics.

People can claim to be what they want. I can’t for the life of me understand why they want to be called “Catholic” if they don’t want to obey the Catholic Church. :confused::confused:
People with a grudge against the Church pretend to be Catholic so they can bring scandal to the Church.
 
People with a grudge against the Church pretend to be Catholic so they can bring scandal to the Church.
It seems that many desire the title Catholic no matter what. Just think of how many out there hate the Church but insist in being Catholic to the point of even calling the CC of roman Catholic Church as a way of diminishing her to nothing more than just one more church among many.
 
Spiritus Christi is not a Catholic church under the bishop. It is a church which broke away from the bishop in 1998.

cleansingfiredor.com/2011/05/here-a-priestess-there-a-priestess/

We have such a church in schism in St. Louis. When then Archbishop Burke tried to reign them in, he was publicly crucified by the press and liberal Catholics.

People can claim to be what they want. I can’t for the life of me understand why they want to be called “Catholic” if they don’t want to obey the Catholic Church. :confused::confused:
One answer, that is publically known is that the Spiritus Christi folk feel that the Church is too conservative and too slow to react to “change.” So, they feel they are “prophetic” in some way.
 
In fairness (I do not know this bishop), the country at large has suffered a 25% decline in Mass attendance, overall versus just one year ago, IIRC. (Don’t have the links handy.)’

🙂
I don’t know where you got that number but, according to Mark Gray at CARA, Catholic Mass attendance in the U.S. has been “extraordinarily stable” at 24% over the last 10 years.

Meanwhile, Mass attendance in the Diocese of Rochester has fallen 33% (from 108,000 to 71,901) during the same period (source here).
 
I don’t know where you got that number but, according to Mark Gray at CARA, Catholic Mass attendance in the U.S. has been “extraordinarily stable” at 24% over the last 10 years.
The claim is a nationwide 24% Mass attendance rate.
Meanwhile, Mass attendance in the Diocese of Rochester has fallen 33% (from 108,000 to 71,901) during the same period (source here).
The link you provided states:
In the Diocese of Rochester, noted for its widespread liturgical abuse and dissent from Church teaching, Mass attendance is now running at 23%.
At 23%, the Diocese of Rochester’s Mass attendance rate isn’t significantly different from the 24% nationwide average. What am I missing here?
 
The claim is a nationwide 24% Mass attendance rate.

The link you provided states:

At 23%, the Diocese of Rochester’s Mass attendance rate isn’t significantly different from the 24% nationwide average. What am I missing here?
I think the issue that is concerning is that the rate has fallen drastically over the years.
 
The claim is a nationwide 24% Mass attendance rate.

… the Diocese of Rochester doesn’t seem to be significantly different than anywhere else in that regard.
It isn’t now, but it was much better 10 years ago, at ~ 37%.

The fact remains that 33% of the people in DOR’s collective pews 10 years ago are no longer there today. And no, there has been no overall population change during that period; our 12 county population is down less than 0.5% since 2000.

(BTW, DOR’s Catholic marriages and infant baptisms are also tanking, but that’s a subject for another time.)
 
I don’t know where you got that number but, according to Mark Gray at CARA, Catholic Mass attendance in the U.S. has been “extraordinarily stable” at 24% over the last 10 years.
There were a couple of online Catholic publications which had reported on a national survey. It might have been conducted by Catholics, not the secular media. 🤷
As to one of my local parishes, the parallel decline with the national figures was reported by the priests, plural. They were concerned about that, particularly because it was (for this location) as surprising to me as it was to them, given the general engagement with liturgy at this location. (Strong attendance; people coming because they want to, for the most part, not out of “obligation.”)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top