A
anp1215
Guest
To the bolded-me too. Right now we’re not really trying to conceive or avoid, just letting things happen but I am still keeping up with my chart because I just think it’s interesting and good to know, like what my chances would be of getting pregnant, even though I’m not trying to stop or prevent that, you know? Also my instructor said by looking at your temps. after ovulation you can kind of tell if you conceived or not before you miss your period. I’m still trying to figure out what she means though. Are they higher than if you didn’t conceive? Like I said, not trying really either way, but would like to know!I would say that easily half of the couples I know have also had ABC pregnancies. I would say that their effort is greater than mine - it take me 60 seconds to temp each day, about 3 minutes of total effort to chart electronically. What a wonderful wealth of information about my health! 3 minutes out of my total day isn’t exactly a herculean effort. ** Even at times we were actively trying to conceive, or completely open to life, I charted. ** I’ve had a medical condition diagnosed and treated based on the information on my chart - completely not pregnancy related. I love the knowledge charting gives me.
No method is 100%. NFP really causes you to revevaluate every month the reason you may have discerned to avoid pregnancy which I think is a positive.
I have had 1 “not planned by me” pregnancy in 20+ years of using NFP. I’m extremely fertile. I think NFP works well. Anyone who has life threatening reasons to avoid pregnancy, I’d advise complete abstanance, or a very conservative use of NFP which is totally possible. ABC fails too. 1/2 of women seeking abortions were actively using a contraceptive. Saying “NFP is hard and sometimes fails” could be said about ABC too. Chemical contraceptives can be very hard a woman, some women tolerate them very poorly. I don’t know anyone who uses condoms who actually likes them. IUDs can cause signicant cycle problems. And they all fail.