I wonder if age and experience has something to do with it (demand or lack of), too; in several ways not all of them obvious.
My late 98 year old father, for instance, for most of his life experienced the Latin Mass. However, after approx 30 or so years of no exposure, he forgot everything and when I would take him (because he DID enjoy it), later in his life, to a TLM, he had trouble following it, didn’t understand what was going on (he had no dementia issues so that was not involved) and had to be completely ‘re-educated’ as to the rituals, vestments, meanings of things, etc. For those of us a bit younger - 60’s and such - many of us actually remember the Latin Mass, we were choir members, altar servers, knew Latin and I think we are the majority, by and large, that long for the TLM to be available.
Then there are the younger people (30-50 years old). Among this group, one has to be dedicated to self-education and learning to become familiar with the TLM and to involve oneself. This is good; don’t get me wrong; just that my experience is that not many go to these lengths but just go along to get along. It’s also true of this age group that they have been exposed to so much irreverence, liturgical abuse and ‘dumbing down’ of the Mass that many have lost interest altogether. Their catechesis has also been astoundingly bad because of the atmosphere of relativism and free-form theology they have been taught.
Really younger people (teens - 30’s), in my experience, are on either end (the majority of them) of a pretty wide spectrum and not many in the middle. They are either the ‘new’ (JPII) Catholics and dedicated to learning their faith, returning to meaningful rituals and symbols and insisting on reverence in their worship - OR - they are completely disinterested and have no desire to go to any Mass, much less worry about which one to go to.
I’ve oversimplified a tad to keep this from getting too long, but my overall points are valid from my own experience and questioning of people.
I think the demand for the TLM is affected a lot by these things. It’s not like the reintroduction of the TLM is happening 1 week after Vatican II ended. Many years have passed and much water has gone under the bridge - and most, I think, have ‘adjusted’ all too well (unfortunately).
The demand for the TLM will only be large if the numbers are large of those who miss it, remember it or have educated themselves about it and see it as something that would really be to their liking and benefit.
I think the ‘ready made’ group seeking / waiting for the TLM is an illusion. I think this is what many of us expected - that there were all these people (the ‘demand’) out there, ready-made, just waiting for this.
The truth is that even though many were disatisfied with the worship/liturgy they had access to, they stopped there.
I hope the demand for the TLM will be like many things of this nature…not immediately there, but definitely picking up with time and growing into a vibrant community. A large demographic is not waiting, but I think one can be ‘raised from the ashes’, so to speak, over time and the love of the TLM renewed. I hope I’m not wrong.
I worry more about those able to deliver on it. How many priests these days know Latin anymore? How many ‘agendas’ are there really out there? I don’t like the answers I receive to those questions when I ask around. I hope the answers are wrong.