U
universalindult
Guest
One of the reasons I mentioned the dichotomy between the rank-and-file Catholic desire for the TLM, and the grasp of it by priests and bishops, is my own personal experience with a number of active and retired priests.there is quite a bit of support for the traditional Mass-but it is hidden below the surface and sometimes neeeds a bit of prodding to get out. I think my fellow Trads know the deal, you need to get a certain “feel” with people before you blurt out, “Oh, and by the way, I like to assist at the traditional Mass at my local FSSP/ICRSS parish…” or any other sort of traditional leanings.
I have studiously avoided talking about the TLM with most priests in my practice because I know how they typically react to the subject. So I have maintained very jovial and friendly relations with all my priest-patients, no matter what their views on church issues.
However, I wrote a letter to the editor this past spring about the Pope’s intentions to reintroduce the TLM.
Several of them brought up the subject in subsequent office visits, with palpable scorn and derision, and the interpersonal relationship with these patient-priests has not returned to the jovial, good-natured status it was prior to my letter to the editor.
Interestingly, the retired Franciscans were the most derogatory, and the youngest diocesan priests were the only ones that expressed any kind of support.
If they treat me this way, I’m sure they treat rank-and-file Catholics in the churches similarly, or worse, when those Catholics have attempted to broach the subject of requesting the TLM.
So again, its no surprise that a hostile poll taker won’t hear of much interest or desire in the TLM, sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy.