Non confrontational question for any practicing Mormon (former mormons, please state so when posting)

  • Thread starter Thread starter StrawberryJam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And that, even when what is happening is very good and very loving, is coercion, by definition.
How is it coercion to offer a prayer for someone who is on their way to heaven? That’s like saying if my child is saving for college, and I’m saving for their college also, I’m coercing them to go to college. No. I’m helping them acheive their goal, not forcing it on them. No coercion whatsoever, and none in the case of prayers for those in purgatory. Their goal (heaven) has already been selected, and the costs have been assigned; the prayers are just extra hands offered to assist.

Peace,
-Robert

Note: Analogies are not perfect. But sometimes they help to make a point.
 
And I thought God was unchanging. If he changes his mind because we ask him to, how is he unchanging?
Because I concede I cannot know the mind of God in the first place, I cannot say that a prayer will change God’s mind. But I think this comment is premised upon a misuderstanding. Prayers for those in purgatory do not “change God’s mind” with respect to anything.

Prayers for those already on their way to heaven is part of the Divine Plan for salvation that has been revealed to us. Prayers for those in purgatory are efficacious and always will be efficacious because God does not change.

God acting upon a prayer request does not connote “change” unless one is first ascribing antrhopomorphic attributes to God. Since you see God the Father as a once-Human with a body like ours, I can understand why you would have a difficult time changing that perspective to the Catholic perception of an eternal and unchanging God with no beginning and no end, existing apart from His creation that exists in time and space.

Peace,
Rob
 
“Eternal Progression” implies that God changes.
Yet, even you note in the 17 proofs that Mormonism is true (it was on my daughter’s refrigerator where she keeps all messages she deems important) that Jesus is the same today as yesterday. IOW, Jesus does not change. And we know that Jesus and the Father are one (John 10:30) and that Jesus claimed to be the great “I AM” (which is the name of God). But even if you reject that, Old Testament Malachi 3:6 states (referring to God, the Lord of Hosts) “I am the Lord, I change not”. So how can you say that God is changing?
 
How is it coercion to offer a prayer for someone who is on their way to heaven? That’s like saying if my child is saving for college, and I’m saving for their college also, I’m coercing them to go to college. No. I’m helping them acheive their goal, not forcing it on them. No coercion whatsoever, and none in the case of prayers for those in purgatory. Their goal (heaven) has already been selected, and the costs have been assigned; the prayers are just extra hands offered to assist.

Peace,
-Robert

Note: Analogies are not perfect. But sometimes they help to make a point.
Very nice analogy! I have been pulling my hair out trying to help Diana understand, but obviously I have not been doing a very good job. 😦 Maybe your post will help her. 👍

EDIT TO ADD: Although she will probably say that it is coercion because you didn’t ask your child if he wanted you to help him save for college. Even though your savings would be going directly to the college and the college will not accept your payment if they know that your son did not want your help. 🤷

EDIT 2: LOL! I thought you were in South Dakota until I read your profile and saw that the “SD” in your name is for San Diego! Big difference - at least in weather! 😃
 
The reason that we do not “pray for the repose of the soul” of the dead as Catholics do is because we believe that progression occurs in the spirit world- that the spirit can still progress and to some extent “repent” on the other side
The Book of Mormon disagrees with you. It is very clear that there can be no repentance after death:

31 Yea, I would that ye would come forth and harden not your hearts any longer; for behold, now is the time and the day of your salvation; and therefore, if ye will repent and harden not your hearts, immediately shall the great plan of redemption be brought about unto you.

32 For behold, this life is the time for men to prepare to meet God; yea, behold the day of this life is the day for men to perform their labors.

33 And now, as I said unto you before, as ye have had so many witnesses, therefore, I beseech of you that ye do not procrastinate the day of your repentance until the end; for after this day of life, which is given us to prepare for eternity, **behold, if we do not improve our time while in this life, then cometh the night of darkness wherein there can be no labor performed.

34 Ye cannot say, when ye are brought to that awful crisis, that I will repent, that I will return to my God. Nay, ye cannot say this; for that same spirit which doth possess your bodies at the time that ye go out of this life, that same spirit will have power to possess your body in that eternal world.

35 For behold, if ye have procrastinated the day of your repentance even until death, behold, ye have become subjected to the spirit of the devil, and he doth seal you his; therefore, the Spirit of the Lord hath withdrawn from you, and hath no place in you, and the devil hath all power over you; and this is the final state of the wicked**.
  • Alma 34:31-35
This is just one example of how the Book of Mormon is not reflective of current LDS beliefs. I doubt that Joseph Smith ever read it.

Paul (a former Mormon now happily Catholic)
 
After thinking about this, I think this holds the key as to why Diana thinks our prayers are a form of coercion and why she’s not understanding this topic. This is an extremely misguided and incorrect belief about prayer, but I’m not sure how to correct it. Is this something that Joseph Smith taught (i.e. is this found in LDS Scripture anywhere) and is it a widespread Mormon belief (i.e. if you ask any Mormon this question (why was/wasn’t their prayer answered) will they respond the same way)?
I should clarify. A prayer not answered for LDS is either a) God said no or b)something with themselves needs fixing. Of course there is always the hope that something obviously good, such as good health, finding a job, etc. God would say ‘yes’, NOT having these things remedied often comes under the belief of (b). You can go to lds.org and read it everywhere. Suffering, is an indication that God is not pleased with you and is withholding blessings. LDS are adherents to the “health and wealth” gospel. For every obedient act there is an associated blessing. For every disobedient act something is withheld. Some LDS have defended this stance here.

In the case of something that LDS believe has been promised, such in a patriarchal blessing…if whatever promised is not coming about for sure they know it is (b). Real life example, one of my LDS relatives was promised in her patriarchal blessing she would be a mother. For over a decade of infertility and trying every infertility treatment on the planet with no success, she was in a state of poor mental health. Anxiety and depression. What was she doing wrong that God was not blessing her? I heard her voice this more than once.

When they adopted their first child I went to this child’s blessing. There, this relative bore a testimony that with this child, she could know now that God loved her. I was atheist at the time, but even then, I was fit to be tied and wanted to scream out to the whole place that whatever god this was who caused people to feel unloved, in the anguish of wanting children and not conceiving, was one right and proper b*stard.

It is taught throughout Mormonism from a very young age. It is taught in LDS scripture. All LDS will answer the same.
 
I should clarify. A prayer not answered for LDS is either a) God said no or b)something with themselves needs fixing. Of course there is always the hope that something obviously good, such as good health, finding a job, etc. God would say ‘yes’, NOT having these things remedied often comes under the belief of (b). You can go to lds.org and read it everywhere. Suffering, is an indication that God is not pleased with you and is withholding blessings. LDS are adherents to the “health and wealth” gospel. For every obedient act there is an associated blessing. For every disobedient act something is withheld. Some LDS have defended this stance here.

In the case of something that LDS believe has been promised, such in a patriarchal blessing…if whatever promised is not coming about for sure they know it is (b). Real life example, one of my LDS relatives was promised in her patriarchal blessing she would be a mother. For over a decade of infertility and trying every infertility treatment on the planet with no success, she was in a state of poor mental health. Anxiety and depression. What was she doing wrong that God was not blessing her? I heard her voice this more than once.

When they adopted their first child I went to this child’s blessing. There, this relative bore a testimony that with this child, she could know now that God loved her. I was atheist at the time, but even then, I was fit to be tied and wanted to scream out to the whole place that whatever god this was who caused people to feel unloved was one right and proper b*stard.

It is taught throughout Mormonism from a very young age. It is taught in LDS scripture. All LDS will answer the same.
That is so sad! 😦 But at the same time explains so much! Thank you for the information.
 
Are you kidding?

My kids would get a HUGE bang out of it! I know that they would be giggling like crazy…and couldn’t wait to tell me when they saw me again so I could get a laugh, too.

If I know one son, he’d start looking around to see how many other wierd organizations he could get me posthumously inducted into.

Jay, I still have a pamphlet from my husband’s funeral. It’s in the ‘memory book,’ right next to the program. It’s printed on fuzzy paper in large red and black type, with line drawings (like these sorts of pamphlets usually are…) and it reads, in part: “The deceased is in hell and you will soon follow if you don’t leave the Devil Mormon Church!”

You may not know much about Mormon funerals, but I have to tell you that this pamphlet didn’t cause one iota of outrage…not even a frown. We all had a wonderful laugh about it. Y’see, it doesn’t MATTER to me what other people believe they can do to me, or for me, after I’m dead. It’s what I believe that counts…and in terms of proxy work, it’s also what we believe about it that counts. We do not believe that what we do affects those who have passed on unless they WANT it to affect them, and believe that a note on their genealogical records saying that we have done the posthumous work for them does NOT alter who they were in life in any way, nor associate them with us UNLESS THEY PERSONALLY WANT IT TO AFFECT THEM.
I think it is fantastic that you and your family have such an outlook on life. At the same time, I hope that you have enough empathy and compassion in your heart to realize that not all families will think as you do.
 
The Book of Mormon disagrees with you. It is very clear that there can be no repentance after death:

31 Yea, I would that ye would come forth and harden not your hearts any longer; for behold, now is the time and the day of your salvation; and therefore, if ye will repent and harden not your hearts, immediately shall the great plan of redemption be brought about unto you.

32 For behold, this life is the time for men to prepare to meet God; yea, behold the day of this life is the day for men to perform their labors.

33 And now, as I said unto you before, as ye have had so many witnesses, therefore, I beseech of you that ye do not procrastinate the day of your repentance until the end; for after this day of life, which is given us to prepare for eternity, **behold, if we do not improve our time while in this life, then cometh the night of darkness wherein there can be no labor performed.

34 Ye cannot say, when ye are brought to that awful crisis, that I will repent, that I will return to my God. Nay, ye cannot say this; for that same spirit which doth possess your bodies at the time that ye go out of this life, that same spirit will have power to possess your body in that eternal world.

35 For behold, if ye have procrastinated the day of your repentance even until death, behold, ye have become subjected to the spirit of the devil, and he doth seal you his; therefore, the Spirit of the Lord hath withdrawn from you, and hath no place in you, and the devil hath all power over you; and this is the final state of the wicked**.
  • Alma 34:31-35
This is just one example of how the Book of Mormon is not reflective of current LDS beliefs. I doubt that Joseph Smith ever read it.

Paul (a former Mormon now happily Catholic)
Yep, another classic distorted out of context, driveby Dupre quote.

Unfortunately you neglected to quote verse 30, which gives the context:
30 And now, my brethren, I would that, after ye have received so many witnesses, seeing that the holy scriptures testify of these things, ye come forth and bring fruit unto repentance…
He was speaking to his BRETHREN who had had many WITNESSES of the truth of the scriptures- in other words, faithful members of the church.

For them it WAS the last chance to repent because they had known the truth.

You know, Paul, kind of like you.

He was not talking about the dead who had NOT heard the gospel, which is what we are talking about when we do “work for the dead”.

COMPLETELY different thing.
 
Yep, another classic distorted out of context, driveby Dupre quote.

Unfortunately you neglected to quote verse 30, which gives the context:

He was speaking to his BRETHREN who had had many WITNESSES of the truth of the scriptures- in other words, faithful members of the church.

For them it WAS the last chance to repent because they had known the truth.

You know, Paul, kind of like you.

He was not talking about the dead who had NOT heard the gospel, which is what we are talking about when we do “work for the dead”.

COMPLETELY different thing.
Are you saying that the LDS church does not proxy-baptize those who hear and then reject the LDS missionaries’ message? I hope not, because that would be a lie, and we all know that Mormons never lie. :rolleyes:

My Dad, who died 13 months ago, firmly rejected the LDS religion after coming to understand it better than anyone I have ever known, including Mormons. He took all of the missionary lessons, attended LDS meetings with my Mom for more than 2 years, read all of the LDS standard works and many books by the General Authorities, and the History of the Church, and became convinced that Mormonism is a false religion and a great evil. He remained a joyful, faith-filled practicing Catholic until his death. And yet my sister and her husband will do his temple work this year.

BTW, my Mom left the LDS after two years of miserable membership. She also became a faith-filled practicing Catholic.

Paul (a former Mormon, now happily Catholic)
 
“Eternal Progression” implies that God changes.

Any God who answers prayers must change.

Plato was wrong. Heraclitus was right. But I suppose that is beyond the scope of all this.
Mormonism teaches that God is unchangeable:

Malachi 3:

6 For I am the Lord, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

Mormon 9:

19 And if there were miracles wrought then, why has God ceased to be a God of miracles and yet be an unchangeable Being? And behold, I say unto you he changeth not; if so he would cease to be God; and he ceaseth not to be God, and is a God of miracles.

Moroni 8:

18 For I know that God is not a partial God, neither a changeable being; but he is unchangeable from all eternity to all eternity.

D&C 20:

17 By these things we know that there is a God in heaven, who is infinite and eternal, from everlasting to everlasting the same unchangeable God, the framer of heaven and earth, and all things which are in them.

And from the Lectures on Faith by Joseph Smith, Lecture 3:

12 From the foregoing testimonies, we learn the following things respecting the character of God:

15 Third, that he changes not, neither is there variableness with him; but that he is the same from everlasting to everlasting, being the same yesterday today and forever; and that his course is one eternal round, without variation.

21b For without the idea of unchangeableness in the character of the Deity, doubt would take the place of faith.

21c But with the idea that he changes not, faith lays hold upon the excellencies in his character with unshaken confidence, believing he is the same yesterday, today, and forever, and that his course is one eternal round.
 
Yep, another classic distorted out of context, driveby Dupre quote.

Unfortunately you neglected to quote verse 30, which gives the context:
As usual, mf, you totally missed the point. You stated that people can repent after death. The Book of Mormon says otherwise. It mattereth not whether the person is a member of the church or not.
 
NO WE ARE NOT!!!

We are asking God to answer our prayers according to His Will. Perhaps that the disconnect here. Catholics understand that everything in life including answered prayers are always subject to God’s Will. ALWAYS!!! If we pray to God for someone to be healed and it is not His Will for that person to be healed, he will not be. God’s answer was “no”. That is not subject to our worthiness, sincerity, etc. His answer is just “no”. The same with your alcoholic analogy. (I think that was yours.) If we pray to God for his healing and freedom from alcohol dependency, and God knows that this person’s heart is so hard that he will not accept any help, then he won’t be helped. God does not coerce anyone to do anything based on our prayers.

Your analogy doesn’t work because the neighbor is not God and does not knowwhat Mom wants. Only God knows everything. I will just leave it at that because I’m tired of arguing the same points over and over.
Again you are not telling me that you ask permission from the folks for whom you are praying. You are justifying the fact that you don’t.

C’mon, Jay, you are begging the question.
 
How is it coercion to offer a prayer for someone who is on their way to heaven? That’s like saying if my child is saving for college, and I’m saving for their college also, I’m coercing them to go to college. No. I’m helping them acheive their goal, not forcing it on them. No coercion whatsoever, and none in the case of prayers for those in purgatory. Their goal (heaven) has already been selected, and the costs have been assigned; the prayers are just extra hands offered to assist.

Peace,
-Robert

Note: Analogies are not perfect. But sometimes they help to make a point.
Not quite the same thing, Robert. For one thing, how do you KNOW that the folks you are praying for actually want them? One can assume that you know your kid wants to go to college; you have actual conversations with him about it. If you ask him, what if he tells you 'no, Dad, I’m going to join the Navy and not go to college for a few years, and when I do go…if I ever go…I’ll let the Navy pay for it." Would you STILL save the money for college for him?

What you are doing is saving money for him…without the slightest idea whether he wants to go to college or not; you are simply assuming that he does, and will, and will be grateful for your help. Your assumption may well be right…but you don’t KNOW that, do you? Can you imagine for an instant that he might want to be a…street busker, instead?

I know for a fact that there are quite a few people out there who would be very much against Catholic prayers for their souls. They would be supremely insulted by the very idea…and so, I’m sure, do you know this. Even so, I’ll bet you pray for them anyway, right? Can’t hurt, after all.

Your analogy is a good one…to prove my point, anyway. 😉 You HAVE communication with your kid; you have conversations and know what his goals are. Tell me…would the same point apply if you decided to save up and offer a scholarship to some random stranger with whom you have no communication? One who may well neither want, nor need, your college fund?
 
As usual, mf, you totally missed the point. You stated that people can repent after death. The Book of Mormon says otherwise. It mattereth not whether the person is a member of the church or not.
You have failed to show that, care to try again?
 
I think it is fantastic that you and your family have such an outlook on life. At the same time, I hope that you have enough empathy and compassion in your heart to realize that not all families will think as you do.
Of course I do.

However, (and here is the thing that people here seem to be missing…) having empathy and understanding that others do not believe as I do is one thing…APOLOGIZING because their beliefs do not march with mine, or because the offense they take is based upon a deep misunderstanding of what it is we do, is quite another.

There is a time and a place for everything, Jay…and the time for being empathetic for other’s beliefs is…not in this place, in this debate forum, where we are discussing what Mormons do, WHY we do it, and what effect we think it has versus the affect other people think it has, or are offended by.

HERE is where I can tell people that yes, I understand they might feel offended, but they are wrong to feel offended–because we aren’t doing what they seem to think we are.

…and I will not apologize for my faith, Jay. I will explain why it is WE believe that those who take offense at what we do are misunderstanding what it is we do. I see absolutely no reason to apologize for giving offense—when we haven’t done what those claiming offense say we did.

Please note; I’m not asking you to apologize for your beliefs, or to change what you believe. I’m simply asking you, and others, to make their judgments according to what actually IS, not upon what isn’t.

You have been trying to get me to ‘understand’ something that I actually DO understand, and are entirely missing the point. This isn’t about whether praying for the dead is a good thing, a bad thing, justified or not.

This is about one very simple part of that. you do not consult the dead. According to y’all, praying for the dead is efficacious…period. That may well be a very good thing, but good, bad or indifferent, it’s a fait accompli…and what we do is NOT.

While you personally may not care whether we do proxy work or not, or think it affects you, many of the folks who post here DO care, and insist that we don’t have a right to practice our beliefs in this matter because doing so is offensive to people…it is perceived as forcing Uncle to be a Mormon when he doesn’t want to be a Mormon.

…why should I apologize for that, when that isn’t what we do, AT ALL? I’m not going to apologize for an offense not given, or intended.

One last thought: you have spent a couple of days now defending what Catholics do as to prayers for the dead, Masses and candles; you certainly have not seen any need to apologise for what you do on their behalf, have you, even though it’s obvious that my view of what you do is a little different from yours? No sir, you’ve been pounding your head against walls, attempting over and over to justify your beliefs, and to accuse me of being deliberately obtuse; it’s MY fault that I don’t believe as you do, and if I seem offended, then it’s because I don’t "get’ it. You certainly do not feel you have to moderate your actions or beliefs in any way to accommodate my sensibilities…and you are quite right. You should not.

However, do you see the irony in requiring me to apologize for my beliefs, to moderate my actions, and to ‘empathize’ with people who completely misunderstand what we do?
 
Mormonism teaches that God is unchangeable:
Read Heraclitus. Imagine a great river like the Mississippi and imagine it flowing eternally. It is always there in its essential characteristics, yet it is always changing. It is unchanging and yet constantly changing.

But that is not the Neoplatonism of the Catholics.

But I do not want to argue with you, my brother Zerinus!
 
Read Heraclitus. Imagine a great river like the Mississippi and imagine it flowing eternally. It is always there in its essential characteristics, yet it is always changing. It is unchanging and yet constantly changing.

But that is not the Neoplatonism of the Catholics.

But I do not want to argue with you, my brother Zerinus!
I don’t want to argue with anybody either! But words acquire certain theological definitions and meanings especially when used in scripture, and it creates confusion when we try to reinvent the wheel and create arbitrary new definitions for them. When we talk about the “changeableness” or “unchangeableness” of God, those terms are used in the same sense in which they are used in the above scriptures and in the Lectures on Faith by Joseph Smith. It creates theological confusion and chaos to invent new definitions for them. The scriptures teach that God is unchangeable, period, and that is what we believe.
 
Of course I do.

However, (and here is the thing that people here seem to be missing…) having empathy and understanding that others do not believe as I do is one thing…APOLOGIZING because their beliefs do not march with mine, or because the offense they take is based upon a deep misunderstanding of what it is we do, is quite another.

There is a time and a place for everything, Jay…and the time for being empathetic for other’s beliefs is…not in this place, in this debate forum, where we are discussing what Mormons do, WHY we do it, and what effect we think it has versus the affect other people think it has, or are offended by.

HERE is where I can tell people that yes, I understand they might feel offended, but they are wrong to feel offended–because we aren’t doing what they seem to think we are.

…and I will not apologize for my faith, Jay. I will explain why it is WE believe that those who take offense at what we do are misunderstanding what it is we do. I see absolutely no reason to apologize for giving offense—when we haven’t done what those claiming offense say we did.

Please note; I’m not asking you to apologize for your beliefs, or to change what you believe. I’m simply asking you, and others, to make their judgments according to what actually IS, not upon what isn’t.

You have been trying to get me to ‘understand’ something that I actually DO understand, and are entirely missing the point. This isn’t about whether praying for the dead is a good thing, a bad thing, justified or not.

This is about one very simple part of that. you do not consult the dead. According to y’all, praying for the dead is efficacious…period. That may well be a very good thing, but good, bad or indifferent, it’s a fait accompli…and what we do is NOT.

While you personally may not care whether we do proxy work or not, or think it affects you, many of the folks who post here DO care, and insist that we don’t have a right to practice our beliefs in this matter because doing so is offensive to people…it is perceived as forcing Uncle to be a Mormon when he doesn’t want to be a Mormon.

…why should I apologize for that, when that isn’t what we do, AT ALL? I’m not going to apologize for an offense not given, or intended.

One last thought: you have spent a couple of days now defending what Catholics do as to prayers for the dead, Masses and candles; you certainly have not seen any need to apologise for what you do on their behalf, have you, even though it’s obvious that my view of what you do is a little different from yours? No sir, you’ve been pounding your head against walls, attempting over and over to justify your beliefs, and to accuse me of being deliberately obtuse; it’s MY fault that I don’t believe as you do, and if I seem offended, then it’s because I don’t "get’ it. You certainly do not feel you have to moderate your actions or beliefs in any way to accommodate my sensibilities…and you are quite right. You should not.

However, do you see the irony in requiring me to apologize for my beliefs, to moderate my actions, and to ‘empathize’ with people who completely misunderstand what we do?
You are seriously delusional and after this I am putting you on ignore. When have I ever asked you to apologize for doing proxy work or anything else? I don’t think I’ve ever even asked you to moderate what you do about it. I simply gave you my opinion on it and tried to help you understand how I see it. Seriously, have you even read any of the posts?

You have been arrogant, condescending and snotty, all while attributing beliefs to me that I do not hold. I don’t care that other people argue that proxy work coerces someone. I have not. I was simply trying to correct your misconceptions and misunderstandings about Purgatory and Catholic prayers, yet you felt it necessary to jump all over me and attribute things to me that don’t even apply. After reading Rebecca’s posts about the Mormon view of prayer I think I understand your disconnect, so I will just leave this alone.

EDIT TO ADD: Regarding your last statement/quesion (I’ve already addressed that I have not asked you to apologize nor moderate your actions)- I also have not asked you to empathize with people who misunderstand what you do. I wanted you to empathize with people who are offended because their relative’s name is recorded (in writing) as being associated with Mormonism. This IS something that you do. There is no way for any relatives who know that the deceased would not accept Mormonism to add an entry to the record that says “proxy baptism rejected”. Their relative’s entry will always be left as being a “maybe” - “maybe they accepted the Mormon gospel, maybe they didn’t, it was just offered”, when the relatives, knowing that Mormonism is false want it to be recorded as “Rejected” and obviously there is no way to do that.
 
You are seriously delusional and after this I am putting you on ignore. When have I ever asked you to apologize for doing proxy work or anything else? I don’t think I’ve ever even asked you to moderate what you do about it. I simply gave you my opinion on it and tried to help you understand how I see it. Seriously, have you even read any of the posts?
Jay.

this is a public forum. I am not addressing you personally…I am addressing the position you are defending…that of those who DO criticise. You jumped in the middle of this conversation, take the side of the critics, and somehow I am simply supposed to understand that you are NOT criticising?

How was I supposed to do that, when you didn’t mention that you didn’t mind proxy work until several days AFTER you jump into the debate? Of course, your last paragraph seems to indicate that you do, indeed, have a problem with the idea…

…and that you seem to side with the family that wants us to mark ‘offer rejected’ on the forms. As you have said, there’s no way to do that, and frankly, those who want this sort of thing don’t have a right to want it. That again is being very blunt…but just as I have no right to make my parent’s financial/religious/moral decisions for them, neither do the relatives of those who have passed on have the right to make those decisions for them.

You may put me on ignore all you want to, but what I am seeing here is a fundamental refusal, on your part, to understand what it is I am trying to say.

I am NOT criticising your faith or the intent of your prayers for those who have passed on. I am NOT criticising the love that goes into them, or the fact that your actions and prayers are justified BY that love. Nor am I arguing that you are mistaken or wrong in doing so. How could I? I too pray for the welfare of people I haven’t had a chance to permission from, though I do ask whenever I CAN ask.

I am simply pointing out that…you don’t ask. You don’t feel it necessary, for all the reasons you have given me. You justify the fact that you don’t ask…and all that is fine; but all that does not change the fact that a: you don’t ask, and b;even though you don’t ask, you believe that your prayers are effective.

***Justifying your actions is NOT the same thing as denying them, Jay! ***

Nor have I ever criticised you or said that praying for the dead is NOT a good thing to do, in spite of the fact that you cannot–and do not even think about–asking them if they want such prayers.

Compare that to what we do; that is, our proxy work is not, and cannot be, effective without the direct and willing acceptance of those for whom it is done, and just perhaps you can see the point I’m trying to get at here:

Those who DO tell us how arrogant and coercive our proxy work is…those critics you are defending, by the way…are wrong to do so. They are wrong to take offense at what we do for the reasons they claim, because what we do is not even close to being as coercive as what they do every time they pray for a dead loved one, or have a Mass said on his behalf, or when they light a candle for her.

You justify it by saying that you are not coercing God…well, I never claimed you were. You justify it by saying that ‘of course’ anybody in purgatory would WANT this help…that those who wouldn’t want it would be in hell-----but y’know, there is absolutely no support for that position other than your own personal faith. You have NO idea whether those in purgatory would appreciate your prayers or not; you simply assume that '“of course” they would. You may be right…but then again, you may be wrong and in either case it doesn’t matter. Right or wrong, you don’t ask, and the very idea that it might be a good idea TO ask has you in a tailspin; it is utterly foreign to your belief system.

It is simple, Jay. You are defending those who criticise us because they claim our proxy work is coercive. Therefore, even though your personal beliefs about that may differ, you are the one doing the arguing…and you are the one to whom I must present my position.

Those who criticize us because they claim we are being coercive, or forcing our beliefs upon the dead, are projecting. Because this is what THEY do–because they believe that thier own prayers for the dead are effective “will they, nill they,” they assume that we believe the same thing about our own proxy work…and can’t seem to understand that we don’t; for us the idea of choice, and permission, is so central to what we believe and teach that the idea of anybody becoming a Mormon when they don’t want it is as unthinkable as your intransigent insistance that choice is irrelevent to your own actions and prayers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top