S
SamH
Guest
But the laws like the state’s assault weapon ban didn’t protect her as many here claim they will.The laws killed her? You could have fooled me, I thought it was bullets from the guns she had a legal right to bear?
But the laws like the state’s assault weapon ban didn’t protect her as many here claim they will.The laws killed her? You could have fooled me, I thought it was bullets from the guns she had a legal right to bear?
Pretty well, last I heard.And hows that working out for them?
Why? Did she have a banned weapon or were her weapons not banned by the law?But the laws like the state’s assault weapon ban didn’t protect her as many here claim they will.
We are discussing guns here. Do you want us to also discuss about preventing disease from killing people? Of course, we can also discuss that.So saving lives isn’t the goal, its saving the “right” lives?
Fantasy land seems to be doing OK, but many other countries are seeing sharp increases in all violent crimes.Pretty well, last I heard.
So it has nothing to do with saving lives - its all about control.We are discussing guns here. Do you want us to also discuss about preventing disease from killing people? Of course, we can also discuss that.
But still less polarizing and more practical than anything uttered by Obama.Not practical at all. It is a polarizing soundbite
I’m still waiting for you to list the modern safety systems these schools have.Pretty well, last I heard.
No, she was perfectly within all the laws that are supposed to keep her safe - yet she still died a violent death. The laws didn’t help.Why? Did she have a banned weapon or were her weapons not banned by the law?
So people should be allowed to have any kind of a weapon then because anything could be a weapon?A brick could be an assault weapon. Or a baseball bat. Or many other things.
It’s about saving lives that are lost as a result of guns. That’s what this thread is about. Is it so hard to comprehend?So it has nothing to do with saving lives - its all about control.
Gotcha.
Nate Silver began his career predicting elections on Daily Kos - so I have reason to believe they are fairly well grounded in reality.Daily Kos?
I’m sure it’s about as balance as the Mother Jones in depth analysis.
You should see the study by William Landes and John Lott.
Ther are numerous examples of an armed citizen stopping a (potential) mass shooting. Clackamas being the most recent.
I was always told to never bring a knife to a gun fight.So people should be allowed to have any kind of a weapon then because anything could be a weapon?
That’s the whole point.Isn’t it also teaching kids that the only time they’re safe is when they’re locked in and protected by a gun?
What does abortion do apart from killing? Any loss of innocent life from a gun is awful, but the truth is that guns save far more than they kill, so there has to be perspective on guns and weighing up the evidenceI meant for your assertion that abortion “only kills”. Abortion is far more complicated than that. I’m pretty certain you will find many people who claim that they were “saved” by abortion as well. That doesn’t make it true.
My point? Like guns - statistics are very useful when used properly.
Neither did her little arsenal.The laws didn’t help.
Guns save more lives than they take? How’s that again?What does abortion do apart from killing? Any loss of innocent life from a gun is awful, but the truth is that guns save far more than they kill, so there has to be perspective on guns and weighing up the evidence
If saving children’s lives is important, Obama can immediately do two things:It’s about saving lives that are lost as a result of guns. That’s what this thread is about. It is so hard to comprehend?
I dealt with that some posts ago.I’m still waiting for you to list the modern safety systems these schools have.