Nra calls for armed police officer in every school

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The practical solution is to ban all handguns and all guns that can fire more than one shot without being reloaded.

The single-shot weapons should be available for rental for only hunting or target practice. The renter should be responsible for mishaps or crimes, even if the gun is taken. The renter should be strictly liable under both criminal and civil law. Rentals should have to be set up a minimum of 7 months in advance.
 
It’s more practical and immediate to find the money to arm and employ hundreds of thousands of guards? Seriously? Who should he tax to fund the NRA’s plan - it’s card-carrying members?
Not any more expensive than studying, implementing and enforcing massive new gun control.

But I am sure Obama could find the money from somewhere. He is a smart guy. He says that he is serious about finding a solution. But he has yet to offer a practical solution. Mr. LaPierre just offered a practical solution. I am sure that Obama could find some way to fund it. Perhaps he could take the money that he is using to arm the terrrorist “rebels” in Syria, and give that money to Mr. LaPierre’s program. Perhaps we could close a few unnecessary military bases overseas and spend that money on our children.
 
Don’t let Obama hear that there are more taxes, he’ll suddenly be all for the deal…
He should take them up on the suggestion and let them put their money where their mouth is. Something like, “I thank the NRA very much for putting forward a serious proposal, and congratulate them on their willingness to take responsibility for executing it…”
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — The nation’s largest gun-rights lobby is calling for armed police officers to be posted in every American school to stop the next killer “waiting in the wings.”

The National Rifle Association broke its silence Friday on last week’s shooting rampage at a Connecticut elementary school that left 26 children and staff dead.

The group’s top lobbyist, Wayne LaPierre, said at a Washington news conference that, quote, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

bigstory.ap.org/article/nra-returns-public-debate-meet-media
Is the NRA going to pay for it?
 
Which ban? Where?
It’s logical, it’s common sense. If a guy doesn’t have a weapon capable of killing let’s say 100 people, how else can he kill such a number of persons?
Does the number of people killed in a crime matters to you or not?
1994 federal assault weapons ban banned manufacture of magazines 10 or more rounds and see what a study comission by the National Institute of Justice and done by the University of Pennsylvania said they
failed to produce any evidence that the ban reduced the number of victims per gun homicide incident
the average number of gunshot wounds per victim [about two wounds per victim] did not decrease
The banned weapons and magazines were never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders
We were unable to detect any reduction to date in two types of gun murders that are thought to be closely associated with assault weapons, those with multiple victims in a single incident and those producing multiple bullet wounds per victim
 
Not any more expensive than studying, implementing and enforcing massive new gun control.

But I am sure Obama could find the money from somewhere. He is a smart guy. He says that he is serious about finding a solution. But he has yet to offer a practical solution. Mr. LaPierre just offered a practical solution. I am sure that Obama could find some way to fund it. Perhaps he could take the money that he is using to arm the terrrorist “rebels” in Syria, and give that money to Mr. LaPierre’s program. Perhaps we could close a few unnecessary military bases overseas and spend that money on our children.
Why? It’s LaPierre’s baby - let him support it. Prez should absolutely take him up on the offer.
 
The practical solution is to ban all handguns and all guns that can fire more than one shot without being reloaded.

The single-shot weapons should be available for rental for only hunting or target practice. The renter should be responsible for mishaps or crimes, even if the gun is taken. The renter should be strictly liable under both criminal and civil law. Rentals should have to be set up a minimum of 7 months in advance.
Agreed.

Then we’ll find out how many people will fight till they take their gun from their cold dead hand. Even if its only 1% of gun owners thats only 800,000 citizens and probably half that many law enforcement killed taking it from them

So plan on killing 1.2 million Americans with your “plan”.
 
Worst school massacre in US history was in 1927. 2 teachers, four others and 38 children were killed and a bomb was used

Timothy McVey used fetiliser

In the link I provided to seekerz there were Chinese teachers and children killed by a cleaver in a different attack
They just don’t get it! It’s like arguing with a wall. There is a reason why terrorist used anything other than guns in Israel! You come out to the markets and begins shooting you may get 5 or 8 people until someone shoots and takes you out. But you make inexpensive concealable bombs and blow it in the middle of the crowd you can take out up to 50 people without anyone ever knowing. These whakos will do the same! Bombs can easily be made.
 
1994 federal assault weapons ban banned manufacture of magazines 10 or more rounds and see what a study comission by the National Institute of Justice and done by the University of Pennsylvania said they
Of course it does reduce the number of persons killed at a goal–in a single incident.
 
Why? It’s LaPierre’s baby - let him support it. Prez should absolutely take him up on the offer.
Actually all they need to do is repeal the “Gun Free Schools Act” that has killed so many children and the problem is solved for free.
 
The practical solution is to ban all handguns and all guns that can fire more than one shot without being reloaded.

The single-shot weapons should be available for rental for only hunting or target practice. The renter should be responsible for mishaps or crimes, even if the gun is taken. The renter should be strictly liable under both criminal and civil law. Rentals should have to be set up a minimum of 7 months in advance.
So how do we defend ourselves against criminals who have guns?
 
And how many mass bombings or knife attacks have there been in our history? Any weapon can kill but some weapons are very obviously more easily available and deadly than others.

Also, if I’m not much mistaken, the sale of fertilizer is monitored in efforts to prevent bomb-making. Does that infringe the rights of farmers to make a living?
Mass shooting almost always take place in gun free zones and that goes back to my post on the first page of this thread

People can buy fertiliser and bomb making equipment fairly easily
 
Your move, Mr. President.
Fine, bill the NRA for the expense of recruiting, training, arming, and compensating 132,183 new police officers and hold them legally liable for ANY mishaps or school shootings. The NRA has finally lost its marbles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top