Obama and Romney Hit Final Stretch Part 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter qui_est_ce
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I want a Romney landslide, a very convincing win to dispel all doubts. But I also want new Porsche for Christmas. I’m not sure which one is more likely! 🙂
😃

If we get Romney, you’ll be able to actually afford the Porsche*

*Ferrari>>>>>>>>Porsche :coffeeread:
 
😃

If we get Romney, you’ll be able to actually afford the Porsche*
*Ferrari>>>>>>>>Porsche :coffeeread:
Our last presidential deified saint, was Saint Reagan, Patron Saint of the One Percent, and arch enemy of the 90%. Destroyer of the Poor and Mentally Ill. Defied by the right.

Do you think that Romney will be similarly deified?
 
Our last presidential deified saint, was Saint Reagan, Patron Saint of the One Percent, and arch enemy of the 90%. Destroyer of the Poor. Defied by the right.

Do you think that Romney will be similarly deified?
I sure hope so:)
 
Monday Morning
Peggy Noonan

We begin with the three words everyone writing about the election must say: Nobody knows anything. Everyone’s guessing. I spent Sunday morning in Washington with journalists and political hands, one of whom said she feels it’s Obama, the rest of whom said they don’t know. I think it’s Romney. I think he’s stealing in “like a thief with good tools,” in Walker Percy’s old words. While everyone is looking at the polls and the storm, Romney’s slipping into the presidency. He’s quietly rising, and he’s been rising for a while.

Obama and the storm, it was like a wave that lifted him and then moved on, leaving him where he’d been. Parts of Jersey and New York are a cold Katrina. The exact dimensions of the disaster will become clearer when the election is over. One word: infrastructure. Officials knew the storm was coming and everyone knew it would be bad, but the people of the tristate area were not aware, until now, just how vulnerable to deep damage their physical system was. The people in charge of that system are the politicians. Mayor Bloomberg wanted to have the Marathon, to show New York’s spirit. In Staten Island last week they were bitterly calling it “the race through the ruins.” There is a disconnect.

But to the election. Who knows what to make of the weighting of the polls and the assumptions as to who will vote? Who knows the depth and breadth of each party’s turnout efforts? **Among the wisest words spoken this cycle were by John Dickerson of CBS News and Slate, who said, in a conversation the night before the last presidential debate, that he thought maybe the American people were quietly cooking something up, something we don’t know about.

I think they are and I think it’s this: a Romney win.**

Romney’s crowds are building—28,000 in Morrisville, Pa., last night; 30,000 in West Chester, Ohio, Friday It isn’t only a triumph of advance planning: People came, they got through security and waited for hours in the cold. His rallies look like rallies now, not enactments. In some new way he’s caught his stride. He looks happy and grateful. His closing speech has been positive, future-looking, sweetly patriotic. His closing ads are sharp—the one about what’s going on at the rallies is moving.

All the vibrations are right. A person who is helping him who is not a longtime Romneyite told me, yesterday: “I joined because I was anti Obama—I’m a patriot, I’ll join up But now I am pro-Romney.” Why? “I’ve spent time with him and I care about him and admire him. He’s a genuinely good man.” Looking at the crowds on TV, hearing them chant “Three more days” and “Two more days”—it feels like a lot of Republicans have gone from anti-Obama to pro-Romney.

Something old is roaring back. One of the Romney campaign’s surrogates, who appeared at a rally with him the other night, spoke of the intensity and joy of the crowd “I worked the rope line, people wouldn’t let go of my hand.” It startled him. A former political figure who’s been in Ohio told me this morning something is moving with evangelicals, other church-going Protestants and religious Catholics. He said what’s happening with them is quiet, unreported and spreading: They really want Romney now, they’ll go out and vote, the election has taken on a new importance to them.

There is no denying the Republicans have the passion now, the enthusiasm. The Democrats do not. Independents are breaking for Romney. And there’s the thing about the yard signs. In Florida a few weeks ago I saw Romney signs, not Obama ones. From Ohio I hear the same. From tony Northwest Washington, D.C., I hear the same.

Is it possible this whole thing is playing out before our eyes and we’re not really noticing because we’re too busy looking at data on paper instead of what’s in front of us? Maybe that’s the real distortion of the polls this year: They left us discounting the world around us.

And there is Obama, out there seeming tired and wan, showing up through sheer self discipline. A few weeks ago I saw the president and the governor at the Al Smith dinner, and both were beautiful specimens in their white ties and tails, and both worked the dais. But sitting there listening to the jokes and speeches, the archbishop of New York sitting between them, Obama looked like a young challenger—flinty, not so comfortable. He was distracted, and his smiles seemed forced. He looked like a man who’d just seen some bad internal polling. Romney? Expansive, hilarious, self-spoofing, with a few jokes of finely calibrated meanness that were just perfect for the crowd. He looked like a president. He looked like someone who’d just seen good internals.

Of all people, Obama would know if he is in trouble. When it comes to national presidential races, he is a finely tuned political instrument: He read the field perfectly in 2008. He would know if he’s losing now, and it would explain his joylessness on the stump. He is out there doing what he has to to fight the fight. But he’s still trying to fire up the base when he ought to be wooing the center and speaking their calm centrist talk. His crowds haven’t been big. His people have struggled to fill various venues. This must hurt the president after the trememdous, stupendous crowds of ’08. “Voting’s the best revenge”—revenge against who, and for what? This is not a man who feels himself on the verge of a grand victory. His campaign doesn’t seem president-sized. It is small and sad and lost, driven by formidable will and zero joy.

I suspect both Romney and Obama have a sense of what’s coming, and it’s part of why Romney looks so peaceful and Obama so roiled.


blogs.wsj.com/peggynoonan/2012/11/05/monday-morning/
 
As yogi would say, “it aint over till its over” that is my prediction.
 
I was compelled to re-print the WSJ article above. I’m a huge fan of Peggy Noonan’s. She speaks so candidly, point blank, so poetic with words. I sincerely hope she is spot on with the election.
 
I sure hope so:)
Look up President Reagan’s actions with the HIV crisis. His direct orders, stopping the CDC from pursuing their normal course of action, because of his hatred of homosexuals, resulted in many thousands, and perhaps millions of deaths. He directly blocked research and prevention efforts. 25 million people have died from that disease. President Reagan is personally responsible for many of those deaths.

He was charismatic. He improved the portfolios of the rich, while increasing our debt as a ratio of GDP more than any president before him. He was effective in foreign policy. He punished the mentally ill, and he killed people with HIV by direct order. He was not an ethical man.
 
Look up President Reagan’s actions with the HIV crisis. His direct orders, stopping the CDC from pursuing their normal course of action, because of his hatred of homosexuals, resulted in many thousands, and perhaps millions of deaths. He directly blocked research and prevention efforts. 25 million people have died from that disease. President Reagan is personally responsible for many of those deaths.

He was charismatic. He improved the portfolios of the rich, while increasing our debt as a ratio of GDP more than any president before him. He was effective in foreign policy. He punished the mentally ill, and he killed people with HIV by direct order. He was not an ethical man.
Don’t forget Operation Condor in South America. He supported the program.
 
Our last presidential deified saint, was Saint Reagan, Patron Saint of the One Percent, and arch enemy of the 90%. Destroyer of the Poor and Mentally Ill. Defied by the right.

Do you think that Romney will be similarly deified?
With all due respect, your description of Reagan as “destroyer of the poor and mentally ill” is itself insane. I did not know one person who viewed Reagan as the Second Coming. Just a great patriot, brilliant but human and mortal. Obots in '08, including a brother, thought of Obama as a great healer and gift to America, rather than the anti-Constitutional compatriot of Ayers, Alinsky and Wright, ready to “transform America” from our beautiful nation into a socialist sewer. :eek: Rob
 
Don’t forget Operation Condor in South America. He supported the program.
Communism was responsible for tens of millions of murders, and still going strong. Reagan recognized this evil, and fought against it with every fiber. Whatever the Gipper did, it does not excuse your support for the divisive, race-baiting autocrat Obama. If I was you, though, I’d prefer to think of perceived evils of decades ago too, rather than give attention to the millions of baby deaths taking place today. And the candidates I’m voting for who support them. :rolleyes: Rob
 
Look up President Reagan’s actions with the HIV crisis. His direct orders, stopping the CDC from pursuing their normal course of action, because of his hatred of homosexuals, resulted in many thousands, and perhaps millions of deaths. He directly blocked research and prevention efforts. 25 million people have died from that disease. President Reagan is personally responsible for many of those deaths.

He was charismatic. He improved the portfolios of the rich, while increasing our debt as a ratio of GDP more than any president before him. He was effective in foreign policy. He punished the mentally ill, and he killed people with HIV by direct order. He was not an ethical man.
What a hateful post:mad:
 
Look up President Reagan’s actions with the HIV crisis. His direct orders, stopping the CDC from pursuing their normal course of action, because of his hatred of homosexuals, resulted in many thousands, and perhaps millions of deaths. He directly blocked research and prevention efforts. 25 million people have died from that disease. President Reagan is personally responsible for many of those deaths.

He was charismatic. He improved the portfolios of the rich, while increasing our debt as a ratio of GDP more than any president before him. He was effective in foreign policy. He punished the mentally ill, and he killed people with HIV by direct order. He was not an ethical man.
Last comment to you: I spoke to a doctor who dealt with AIDS patients every day back in the 80's, and he told me that Reagan's quick action and monetary support to stop the spread, and cure the disease, was a godsend. The meme that Reagan ignored AIDS is another disgusting lie of the left. But hey, guys like you lap it up. :blush: Rob
 
From The Curt Jester (Jeff Miller)
With the advent of so many LCD touch screens in the voting booth just how hard would it be to able to add emoticons with each of your votes? When the emoticons are tabulated politicians would see exactly what you really think of them. Right now a vote appears to them to be an 100 percent vote of approval. It would be great for their humility to get a 80 percent “yawning” and a 10 percent “grossed out’ along with other ratings.
http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/voteholdingmynose.png Holding my nose while voting for you

http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/votelesser2devils.png You are the lesser of evils

http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/voticon_robpirate.jpg I suspect that you will not rob me like a pirate as much as the other guy

and many more . . .

These three pretty much sum up my vote.
 
Communism was responsible for tens of millions of murders, and still going strong. Reagan recognized this evil, and fought against it with every fiber. Whatever the Gipper did, it does not excuse your support for the divisive, race-baiting autocrat Obama. If I was you, though, I’d prefer to think of perceived evils of decades ago too, rather than give attention to the millions of baby deaths taking place today. And the candidates I’m voting for who support them. :rolleyes: Rob
Actually, I’m pro-life, loath Obama, hate Communism, and voted Romney. My opposition to Operation Condor is due to the fact that, regardless of it’s aims, it was an evil program. The widespread kidnapping, torture, and murder of people because of their social and political views (regardless of whether they were Communist or not) is deplorable. I think it was an example of the ends justifying the means.

I will also add that I think Reagan was a great President and a morally-upstanding man (I think the same of Pres. Bush, too), but that he and Bush both made bad decisions that I think were short-sighted (Reagan and Operation Condor, Bush and Iraq/Afghanistan/PATRIOT Act).
 
Actually, I’m pro-life, loath Obama, hate Communism, and voted Romney. My opposition to Operation Condor is due to the fact that, regardless of it’s aims, it was an evil program. The widespread kidnapping, torture, and murder of people because of their social and political views (regardless of whether they were Communist or not) is deplorable. I think it was an example of the ends justifying the means.
Thanks for the clarification. I don’t know enough about this Operation Condor, but I do know how the left re-creates history. Anyway, you are a brother! 👍 Rob
 
Look up President Reagan’s actions with the HIV crisis. His direct orders, stopping the CDC from pursuing their normal course of action, because of his hatred of homosexuals, resulted in many thousands, and perhaps millions of deaths. He directly blocked research and prevention efforts. 25 million people have died from that disease. President Reagan is personally responsible for many of those deaths.

He was charismatic. He improved the portfolios of the rich, while increasing our debt as a ratio of GDP more than any president before him. He was effective in foreign policy. He punished the mentally ill, and he killed people with HIV by direct order. He was not an ethical man.
Excuse my french but this is total ********!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top