Obama backs mosque near ground zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter Musicadmirer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree that bigotry should also not be swept under the rug. Further, those who have flung around perjoratives indiscriminately just to demonize political opponents have actually made such accusations suspect and as a result many will simply ignore such charges as overheated rhetoric, even when real bigotry exists. That’s at least one danger of using such accusations as a political tactic.

I don’t pretend to speak for 9/11 survivors but were I to speculate as to who speaks for them and what are they seeking, I would say that there are many different voices, including those who support the Cordoba project, but among those that oppose it, the majority opinion appears to be (at least to me) that, regardless of the legal right to build, this project is insensitive and should not go forward.
I tend to sense much of what you relate except that most opposing voices seem to be saying the project should be moved rather than halted. Where to? I have not been able to ascertain. As to whether that is indeed the majority opinion is anybody’s guess and with that in mind, I see no reason why the mosque planners would yield to the sensitivities of an unknown proportion of 911 survivors (actually Twin Tower survivors) as opposed to the support or indifference of a similarly unknown proportion.
 
By “whoever they are” I mean that we don’t know who’s backing the building of the mosque. And I have to wonder why this particular spot was chosen since I’ve heard time and again that there’s no Muslim population in the area to be served by it.
As for “asking nicely”, Muslims are the ones who have to prove their good intentions to us. Not the other way around.
Instead of going ahead with this building, why don’t they at least try to show good intentions: create a city park for children to enjoy…start a fund to support city firemen or families of the victims or make a sizeable donation to one already in existence…build a center for homeless people. If their intentions are good I’m sure they could come up with something to show their sincerity to promote peace and unity instead of creating more bad feelings and pushing something that is offensive to a good many people.
Excuse me for presuming them innocent until ulterior motives have been proven. In addition to getting the necessary permission and the approval of local clerics and of their mayor, how else were they supposed to demonstrate that their intentions were good?

We do have a responsibility to ask nicely if we want anything that is not ours by right such as the freedom to determine what someone else does with THEIR own property.
 
President Obama stated that America is a very tolerant country and should allow the mosque to be built at Ground Zero. I agree that America is very tolerant but totally disagree that the mosque should be built at ground zero. Americans have always held out a hand, opened a wallet and have provided the strength of character to help others get through the trials of their lives. That being said, Americans are also very sensitive to the events of 911 and the building of a mosque at ground zero hammers our hearts and souls to the point of physical pain. The events of 911 are seared into the minds and hearts of all Americans, we will never forget. Move the mosque a few miles away and let the souls of those that died on that spot rest in peace.
 
By “whoever they are” I mean that we don’t know who’s backing the building of the mosque. And I have to wonder why this particular spot was chosen since I’ve heard time and again that there’s no Muslim population in the area to be served by it.
As for “asking nicely”, Muslims are the ones who have to prove their good intentions to us. Not the other way around.
Instead of going ahead with this building, why don’t they at least try to show good intentions: create a city park for children to enjoy…start a fund to support city firemen or families of the victims or make a sizeable donation to one already in existence…build a center for homeless people. If their intentions are good I’m sure they could come up with something to show their sincerity to promote peace and unity instead of creating more bad feelings and pushing something that is offensive to a good many people.
In fact there is a community there. That is why there is a mosque there which is 5 blocks away from Ground Zero. So the community center (not a mosque) which they want to build supports the community and Mosque.

The mosque was built before 9/11. Or should they move the mosque also? Especially because that some in this country believe that Islam attacked us and not some fanatics who used religion to support their criminal and political motives.
 
Before this thread gets shut down (1000 post limit) I would just like to reiterate that the builders have a right to build a mosque near ground zero becuase of the United States of America’s Constitution: 1st Amendment Freedom of Religion. Others have a right to protest it becuase of the 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech. I am personally against the mosque being built so close to ground zero.

That being said I agree with Obama on this one, about the wisdom of building a mosque near ground zero.

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
 
I tend to sense much of what you relate except that most opposing voices seem to be saying the project should be moved rather than halted. Where to? I have not been able to ascertain. As to whether that is indeed the majority opinion is anybody’s guess and with that in mind, I see no reason why the mosque planners would yield to the sensitivities of an unknown proportion of 911 survivors (actually Twin Tower survivors) as opposed to the support or indifference of a similarly unknown proportion.
I don’t know that there is a consensus on that. I don’t believe that there is even consensus on whether it should be moved or simply stopped. But since, at least so far, the project promoters show no evidence that they are willing to consider any alternatives, that seems to be a moot point. Obviously intransigence can be found among both those who are in favor of, and those that oppose, this project.

One of our Parish priests, in a recent homily on another subject, made a point of pointing out that in today’s world there are those who will point to the legality of something as proof that it is good, moral, etc. We know that’s just not so. Abortion is legal, yet it is a grave sin. Accordingly, just because something is legal doesn’t make it right.

Thinking only of the 9/11 families (or as you have noted, the Twin Tower families) they have made it clear that this is re-opening an unhealed wound. I haven’t heard any consensus from them as to where an alternative property might be, they just oppose this building, built for this purpose, in this place. Is it emotional? No doubt that’s a part of it, and very likely a very significant part. Grief is, afterall, profoundly emotional, sometimes even debilitating.
 
What 2 American Muslims, N Bolourchi, an Iranian American who lost her mother on 9/11 and Z Jasser, Pres of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, say in OPPOSITION to the mosque in an NPR interview by M Martin, 8.17.2010

audio tape
transcript

Snips:

On the location of the mosque, its symbolism, and Cordoba founder

Ms B:

…I’m not against the religion and this gentleman in particular. I am just saying as family members, this will be a very harsh reminder for us of what happened that day. I wanted to have a beautiful, peaceful place where I go to reflect and to remember my mother because I don’t have a place. There is nothing for me. There’s no gravesite. There is nothing for me to go back to, like anybody else.

And that little piece of land, even though it wasn’t sacred before, obviously, it has turned to a sacred ground for us family members.

… I don’t know the Cordoba founders personally, but I believe that the way they are handling the situation seems to be not a person that is very compassionate and trying to reach out and that is not happening. I have never heard of this gentleman or the Cordoba Ctr in the past nine years that this happened. Nobody had ever contacted us family members saying that there was a proposal to build a building in that site. All of this has stirred up all these emotions.

Dr J:

There’s actually a mosque closer than this one is that nobody said anything about that was harmed much more than this one was. And the problem has to do with the mammoth size of this structure, the fact that its finances are not reflective of the local community there.

The fact that it actually, regardless of what their intentions are to preach nonviolence, it will be used by Islamists who have the lens of everything in the world through political Islam to shed a light that will, out of the ashes of the sorrow of families like Neda’s, has come this Islamic prominence that I think if we had $100 M, I’ll tell you, I’d like to see it spent on a hundred centers around the country counterterrorism, anti al-Qaida centers that show America that we want to lead the war of ideas and not just sort of think that this is a PR problem that we can anesthetize America to the real problem.

… I was disappointed that the president decided to bring the weight of the White House into this … Nobody’s saying to make this illegal. But there’s a difference between something you can do vs. something you should do.

And if they shrink the size of the project so that it’s not imposing and casting a shadow over a cemetery, I would change my opinion. If they committed themselves to local monies only, if they committed themselves to not have it this you know, I just think it’s poor taste and insensitive. It should be something about being American. Interfaith purely, not an Islamic but an American center, dedicated simply to memorializing the families. And if it’s a mosque, not as imposing in the imagery and the optics that it’s going to have.

Ms B:

… I feel the same way because, I mean, to me Islam doesn’t reside in the building. And if we moved it a couple of blocks down the road, Islam will perish. I mean that’s absurd. And he (the builder) is talking about this issue as though that the people who are against building it are bigots and that us family members should not have a voice and somehow he’s more American than the rest of us.

I am a U.S. citizen too, so I have as much of a right to freedom of speech and religion as he does. But I’m in a unique situation that I’m also a family member and I have an emotional tie to that land and he doesn’t. And so I don’t think it is asking too much for him to take our feelings into consideration.

On the collective guilt argument, that all Muslims should be accountable for the actions of some Muslims.

Ms B:

I think that we have to take responsibility for what has happened. I am not saying that this particular gentleman or this particular center did anything wrong. But I can’t help to think that as a clergyman, I don’t know what his real intentions and his beliefs are. You see, there were other mosques before 9/11, and none of those clergymen were able to reach out to society and to say that, look, yes, I know this part of our religion is bad, but we are trying to counter it with our understanding and our love.

That didn’t happen. That is why 9/11 happened. And I don’t think that the existence of a building next to a sacred ground for us family members will make any difference.

Dr J:

… what we’re showing is that we are not a monolithic community and that, actually, when we get involved in the community and sociopolitical affairs, I don’t wear my faith on my sleeve. It’s part of who I am. It’s part of my deep relationship with God. But the collectivization of the community that somehow we as Muslims should think the same in all political movements and somehow we’re no longer going to be Democrats or Republicans or socialists or communists, whatever you want, that’s what political Islam is all about.

And that’s why I’ve really been against this and that this is not a religious statement. It’s becoming it is a political statement by the virtue of its size. And I think the fact that we’re demonstrating that we are not monolithic shows that, yes, I think that if the country started and there have been other mosques in the country like in TN, in CA, that there should be questions about their ideologies.

But nobody should question the right about the ability to build a mosque because that’s a cornerstone of this country and that’s if we change those principles, then we will lose the war of ideas. And I don’t want to see that change.
 
Before this thread gets shut down (1000 post limit) I would just like to reiterate that the builders have a right to build a mosque near ground zero becuase of the United States of America’s Constitution: 1st Amendment Freedom of Religion. Others have a right to protest it becuase of the 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech. I am personally against the mosque being built so close to ground zero.

That being said I agree with Obama on this one, about the wisdom of building a mosque near ground zero.

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
Actually they are not building a mosque. They are building a community center. They had built a mosque before 9/11 which is a couple blocks away.

I am curious though. What would people say if the biggest inhabitor of the Freedom Tower would be a mainly a Chinese company? What if the good portion of the building would be built by Chinese made materials?
 
President Obama stated that America is a very tolerant country and should allow the mosque to be built at Ground Zero. I agree that America is very tolerant but totally disagree that the mosque should be built at ground zero. Americans have always held out a hand, opened a wallet and have provided the strength of character to help others get through the trials of their lives. That being said, Americans are also very sensitive to the events of 911 and the building of a mosque at ground zero hammers our hearts and souls to the point of physical pain. The events of 911 are seared into the minds and hearts of all Americans, we will never forget. Move the mosque a few miles away and let the souls of those that died on that spot rest in peace.
It may ease your mind that it is not a mosque nor is it at ground zero. I also hope the souls of those departed from the Towers rest in peace. Many happened to be muslim.
 
Same as the difference between a YMCA, or a Jewish community center.
So you are telling me that close to 70% of America is against a muslim community center?

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
 
So you are telling me that close to 70% of America is against a mulslim community center?

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
Huh? What does that have to do with my answer to the question to the difference between a Muslim community center and a mosque?
 
Huh? What does that have to do with my answer to the question to the difference between a Muslim community center and a mosque?
Many people are calling it different things. Whether it is actually a community center or mosque what do you think Americans are acutally protesting?

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
 
Many people are calling it different things. Whether it is actually a community center or mosque what do you think Americans are acutally protesting?

If anything I have said is against the Catholic Church, let it be anathema.
well actually it is a community center and not a mosque. It is a place were kids, adults, families can hang out, play basketball, games, relax, workout.

Some (not all) Americans are protesting a mosque which is because the corporate media keeps labeling it as a mosque when in fact it is not. The mosque is something already have which is a couple blocks away and 4 blocks from ground zero.

Would you protest the Freedom Tower if majority of the occupants was a large Chinese company or that the majority of the matierals comes from China?
 
There will always be a few bigots, at least in this world, because some people will cling to that sort of thing no matter what. What I have been trying to point out, is there is bigotry and intolerance on both sides of this debate, although it would appear that at least some people can only see it on one side.

When one person, or some group of people, broadly paint the group they oppose as bigots or racists or some other pejorative they are often guilty of doing exactly the same thing in the process. This does nothing to further productive dialog and is often destructive. It would be refreshing to see all sides drop this method of marginalizing their opponents.
What I have attempted to do throughout this thread is explain that the statements made by the opponents of the Mosque sound to me to be rooted in prejudice. I did not mean to imply that everyone who opposed the mosque is prejudiced. I know that people tend to get swept up in these sorts of issues and not think through the implications their actions might have. It is also true that this is an emotional issue and difficult to consider rationally. On the other hand, I feel it is unacceptable to continue in opposition to any group without being rooted in reason and evidence. I continue my opposition to the mosque opposition because in nearly 1,000 posts, I have not heard a single argument against the mosque that was not predicated on one of the following:

Reason for opposition|Flaw in that reason
The terrorists and those involved in this center are Muslim (or share some Islamic beliefs such as Sharia)|That equates the Islam of the center with the Islam of the terrorists, despite the center’s specific and passionate denunciation of the terrorists.
If they wanted to be sensitive, they could build somewhere else|Does not answer the question “why are you opposed in the first place?”
The Imam has “radical” views and affiliations (e.g. Hamas, US not guilt free in the middle east, Saudi Arabian contributors etc)|No one has proven any such link. The Imam’s views about American roles are mainstream, just not conservative mainstream. Lastly, he is a bridge builder. That he has had talks with unsavory organizations is something that should be expected as part of his job.
US public opinion (or 9/11 families, or whoever) is resoundingly against the Mosque|Our democracy is founded on majority rule… with minority rights. I know, I know, you recognize the Muslim’s right to build there, but nevertheless having them move would be imposing on them solely because of their religion. Also, it does not answer the question "why are all these people opposed in the first place?
The Mosque represents conquest|The community center represents an outreach by the Muslim community to promote interfaith communication. Why don’t you believe the Muslims are forthcoming about their intent?
 
My goodness…for the sake of peace, why is there no compromise. There is a Mosque 4 blocks away from this site. If peace and harmony were the true aims of the Muslim community, then just respect those families of 911 and be done with it already. People can yell from the mountain tops “it’s my right and I will do whatever I please no matter who it hurts”. This is a “me first” society. A compromise with a peaceful solution would be for the Mosque to be built in another location. What is going to happen if the Muslim community can not build at that particular site?..will the earth suddenly stop? Is there not any more important issues that need to be addressed?
 
My goodness…for the sake of peace, why is there no compromise. There is a Mosque 4 blocks away from this site. If peace and harmony were the true aims of the Muslim community, then just respect those families of 911 and be done with it already. QUOTE]

Maybe they are respecting and outreaching to those families. This includes the 80 plus famillies of Muslim faith who were affected the deaths of their family members as a result 9/11. People of the Muslim faith also died in those towers.

But why? Will the Earth stop spinning as you had asked? No… But then we just ago against the principles as to what makes us Americans and what made this country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top