Obama Drops 'Creator' From Declaration Again

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

buffalo

Guest
Obama Drops ‘Creator’ From Declaration Again

Either President Barack Obama isn’t familiar with the words “endowed by their Creator” when quoting the Declaration of Independence, or he doesn’t subscribe to that part of the wording that describes people’s intrinsic rights. At a Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee dinner Monday in Rockville, Md., Obama again either misquoted the words of the most famous document in American history or he purposely omitted them, CNS News reports.

more…
 
Since he is a Constitutional Law expert and since he did on three separate occasions, I have to conclude it was deliberate

Since he is a politician, I assume it was for a political reason.

Note: constitutional law profs know the framing documents inside and out.
 
Conservatives contend that Obama’s inability to credit God for the rights reflects his belief that, if rights come from the government instead of a creator, the government can take them away, too.
Click to expand...
This is** exactly** what Obama and his Supreme Court are trying to do! It is not a slip of the toungue since Obama READS directly from a teleprompter.

We must remain extra vigilant or we will lose our constitutional rights in America, the land of the free.
 
I agree this is deliberate.

But to what end?
What exactly does this buy him?

I’m sure he is getting something for it, I just do not see what it is.
 
vz71 said:
I agree this is deliberate.

But to what end?
What exactly does this buy him?

I’m sure he is getting something for it, I just do not see what it is.
Click to expand...
If you understand the Fabian elements of Progressivism, then the objective is to slowly enculturate the idea that our rights come from government, not from God. It goes along with the maxim, “A lie repeated often enough becomes truth.”
 
gilliam said:
Since he is a Constitutional Law expert and since he did on three separate occasions, I have to conclude it was deliberate

Since he is a politician, I assume it was for a political reason.

Note: constitutional law profs know the framing documents inside and out.
Click to expand...
It’s chilling to think that the president of our country may be an atheist.
 
livnlern said:
It’s chilling to think that the president of our country may be an atheist.
Click to expand...
“The country may survive Barack Obama, but it may not survive the plethora of fools who voted for him.”

I say we get back to the notion of qualifications for voting. I say you need to be a net tax contributor to be eligible to vote. When you send in your 1040, the IRS validated that you are revenue positive and a voting eligibility certification. You don’t pay taxes, or you are a net tax consumer, you don’t vote. I also say along with this, we get rid of the employer withholding system. Make everyone do their taxes and then write a check at the end of year.
 
That doesn’t address the great majority of Catholics who voted for him.

“A lie repeated often enough becomes truth.”

Obama’s an expert at that.
 
Does anyone really think that Obama’s just a big Dum-Dum, and made (the same) mistake again?

Lol! Whoopsie!

Uh huh…

God Bless you.
+Jesus, I Trust In You!
Love, Dawn
 
Rich_Olszewski said:
I was referring to the fact of being an atheist, but I know that many would not vote for a Catholic, a Mormon, or a Muslim either.
Click to expand...
For the record, I would vote for any of the above (including atheist), if their views were in line with Catholic teaching and supported plurality in the public square (i.e. wasn’t under the false, liberal notion that a religious person shouldn’t favor anything religious due to the secular nature of our government). I certainly wouldn’t vote for an anti-theist, or any of the above who believe that killing the innocent, unborn or not, is licit.
 
The President of the United States is a figurehead. He doesn’t spout his own ideas, they are fed to him by the people who put the little puppet in power, namely the corporations, lobbies, and special interest groups, such as athiests and gays and groups with liberal agendas. Vote Republican next time people!
 
CHRISTINE77 said:
The President of the United States is a figurehead. He doesn’t spout his own ideas, they are fed to him by the people who put the little puppet in power, namely the corporations, lobbies, and special interest groups, such as athiests and gays and groups with liberal agendas. Vote Republican next time people!
Click to expand...
Obama is doing this to needle people who question his “faith.” He knows his apologists won’t be bothered, yet he can’t help himself.

This is the kind of immature president we have this day, more concerned about perceptions and mirrors instead of doing his job. More concerned about manipulations and provocations of his detractors.
Yes, Vote Republican, or at least demand the Democratic party get back to sanity, instead of utopian secularism anti-theism.
 
rlg94086 said:
For the record, I would vote for any of the above (including atheist), if their views were in line with Catholic teaching and supported plurality in the public square (i.e. wasn’t under the false, liberal notion that a religious person shouldn’t favor anything religious due to the secular nature of our government).
Click to expand...
It would be weird if they held Catholic teaching, without believing God, I don’t know if that’d ever be the case because nothing would anchor them to keep those teachings, they would eventually compromise due to the demands of the world.
I certainly wouldn’t vote for an anti-theist, or any of the above who believe that killing the innocent, unborn or not, is licit.
Click to expand...
I’d CONSIDER an agnostic who was open to becoming a believer. (i.e. someone who was never shown the way by no fault of their own)
I would NEVER vote for an atheist who consciously rejects God (passively or actively), because you’re voting for someone who’s morally blind and essentially a fool, as the bible says.

Giving them power would be reckless, their arrogance wouldn’t be checked.
 
I’m really not sure Obama is an atheist. He was forced to stop attending that (Baptist??) Church because the minister said some things that were “embarassing” to the liberals.

Obama is really not responsible for what is happening in this country. I’m sure some speech writer is editing out the Creator part. Presidents are really just scapegoats, for a more sinister puppetmaster in the background. I don’t know why anyone would accept that position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top