B
bellasbane
Guest
Good for you! Some people take this forum way to seriously!I know I’m in the minority here but that’s not high on my list of priorities in life.
Good for you! Some people take this forum way to seriously!I know I’m in the minority here but that’s not high on my list of priorities in life.
Crepe-hanging is part of too many comments on the Forum IMO.Good for you! Some people take this forum way to seriously!
Your conclusion is not logical. Massachusetts put the program you like in place before Obamacare existed. How does repealing Obamacare deny the rest of the states in the nation the ability to create a similar system?I just happen to see things differently and do not buy into the scenario you describe. I live in Massachusetts where people who make up to 130% of the poverty level get free healthcare through Medicaid. Those who do not qualify get subsidized coverage based on their income level. Nobody pays a tax unless they refuse to pay into a system that is there for them when they need it. That is reality.
I’m sorry that Romney, who has given all of this to us through Romneycare, would deny it to the rest of the nation by repealing Obamacare. It just doesn’t seem fair to the poor, sick and elderly who happen to live in states where the ruling party thinks access to food, housing and health care are not life issues.
Brilliant. People always forget this. When Roe v Wade is overturned, it returns to each state. If 49 states choose to “overturn” it, it will be because their citizens chose to do so.Your conclusion is not logical. Massachusetts put the program you like in place before Obamacare existed. How does repealing Obamacare deny the rest of the states in the nation the ability to create a similar system?
The “ruling class” in every state are the people of that state…the voters.
Well said,sad but true,nonetheless…In a bad economy, the poor and lest stable among us always get hit first. Businesses can always lay employees off. Employees can’t lay anyone off.
Half the people who are voting for more unemployment and debt are the ones who are going to cry for help when it hits them, (or continues to hit them).
And they want some one to fix it then? Hard to have much sympathy, since we always get the President we deserve. My sympathy is reserved for the people who vote to change their problems, not continue them. I’ll always disagree with Obama on social issues, but at least if the economy was roaring I’d see why people would be swayed.
If we reelect Obama and the economy stays the way it is or gets worse, we deserve it and I will shed no tears for those who chose this fate for themselves. We get who we deserve.
The problem is that liberal elitist “ruling class” in some states…like Massachusetts…feel the need to force their will on the voters of other states in areas where they shouldn’t.Brilliant. People always forget this. When Roe v Wade is overturned, it returns to each state. If 49 states choose to “overturn” it, it will be because their citizens chose to do so.
Who are you quoting?bellasbane;9820623:
Your conclusion is not logical. Massachusetts put the program you like in place before Obamacare existed. How does repealing Obamacare deny the rest of the states in the nation the ability to create a similar system?I just happen to see things differently and do not buy into the scenario you describe. I live in Massachusetts where people who make up to 130% of the poverty level get free healthcare through Medicaid. Those who do not qualify get subsidized coverage based on their income level. Nobody pays a tax unless they refuse to pay into a system that is there for them when they need it. That is reality.
I’m sorry that Romney, who has given all of this to us through Romneycare, would deny it to the rest of the nation by repealing Obamacare. It just doesn’t seem fair to the poor, sick and elderly who happen to live in states where the ruling party thinks access to food, housing and health care are not life issues.
The “ruling class” in every state are the people of that state…the voters.
I don’t get excited about polls, pro or con.Newest polls show Obama is 10 points ahead in Ohio and leading in voter’s opinions as to who will better handle the economy and who will effectively lead in foreign relations, and who would better handle national security.
A candidate has never won the Presidency without winning OH.
cnn.com/2012/09/26/politics/romney-ohio/index.html
But the problems is with the multiple polls right?- that’s MULTIPLE polls.
But Romney’s going to win right?
Oh, I’ll vote though I’m in NY so hardly a battle ground state.I don’t get excited about polls, pro or con.
Congrats if you do.
Since those polls are so reliable, you should stay home in November.
I was kidding, anyway.Oh, I’ll vote though I’m in NY so hardly a battle ground state.
With six weeks to go, it ain’t over til it’s over…I wouldn’t pop that bottle of champagne just yet!Newest polls show Obama is 10 points ahead in Ohio and leading in voter’s opinions as to who will better handle the economy and who will effectively lead in foreign relations, and who would better handle national security.
A candidate has never won the Presidency without winning OH.
cnn.com/2012/09/26/politics/romney-ohio/index.html
But the problem is with the multiple polls right?- that’s MULTIPLE polls.
But Romney’s going to win right?
What is the ratio of Representatives to Senators in your state?The problem is that liberal elitist “ruling class” in some states…like Massachusetts…feel the need to force their will on the voters of other states in areas where they shouldn’t.
Our state has some similar provisions to take care of the poor (i.e. free or subsidized coverage based on income), and our neighbor to the South has a different program. Why do we need to have the same program as Massachusetts? Why do we need Obamacare?
The result probably wont be in until after I am asleep anyway. These things tend to close pretty late.With six weeks to go, it ain’t over til it’s over…I wouldn’t pop that bottle of champagne just yet!![]()
I love VT. If it wasn’t so, well in the back woods, I would move there. Maybe when I retire. Such a beautiful place.If a state can come up with a better plan for universal coverage, like Vermont is working on, they can opt out of Obamacare.
Again, any state can do what their elected representatives (you know, the ones the “ruling class” elected) decide to do. Repealing Obamacare denies them nothing that they want. It only denies them things you (a “ruling class” from a different state) have decided they are too stupid to do themselves. No thanks. We don’t need you and your liberal nannies. We are adults.What is the ratio of Representatives to Senators in your state?
It’s important, because you talk about Massachusetts forcing their will upon the voters of other states, but you ignore the fact that many Red states with low populations routinely force their will on the majority of the people of this nation with every filibuster in the Senate.
If a state can come up with a better plan for universal coverage, like Vermont is working on, they can opt out of Obamacare.
So, you desire to die by being pierced through the heart by a fallen limb from a tree? I could think of better ways to go.The autumn up there can pierce the heart. :heaven:
And Vermont winters can freeze the buttocks. My sister lives in Manchester Center. :snowing: :snowing: :winter:I love VT. If it wasn’t so, well in the back woods, I would move there. Maybe when I retire. Such a beautiful place.
The autumn up there can pierce the heart. :heaven: