L
Lapey
Guest
We all to a certain extent obstinately refuse to examine our own consciences, so to say otherwise is a wrong judgment.Sounds to me like you are inferring that I and maybe a few others here obstinately refuse
to examine our and form our conscience in line with the Church. Wrong judgment sir.
I will just post a bit of what the Bishops have to say,
A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism,
if the voter’s intent is to support that position.In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil.
At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate’s opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity. Peace, Carlan
USCCB
Some keep quoting things that support the choice to vote for a pro abortion candidate (not to mention the other non-negotiables), but the whole point is, that there is more than this to the statements of the Church’s leaders. Formal cooperation is most definitely bad, but even if we do not vote for these evil reasons, we cooperate, although it may be informal and non material; it is cooperation. That is why we are called to employ a life time of forming our consciences to match the teachings of the Church.
The other issues as you put it do not equal that of abortion, same sex union, etc. The plight of the poor does not equal the plight of the unborn. With that statement made, Romney does not promise inattentiveness to the plight of the poor, he intends to free up the job market and put people where they belong, at work so they can in dignity provide for themselves. This is in line with Catholic social teachings.