Obama vs Romney, who are you voting for and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rafael502
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In other words, you’ve got nothing. If you did, you would share it.

From the Catechism: “charity demands beneficence and fraternal correction”

Perhaps, you missed that part…

Now, if you have some relevant, non-prudential matter, please share. If not, please stop making stuff up.
How does one “make up” what you term “nothing”? If I were simply being obtuse, then you would be justified in cautioning me that there is “none so blind as those who will not see”, but since my vision is corrected to 20/20…🤷
 
I will caution you with the same statement you caution me with. And as to the second statement I placed in bold type, I would say reading the democrat party platform would allow these “assumptions” as you state them to be backed up with fact, don’t you agree???👍
Does one have to endorse a particular party platform to support the better of two candidates? :confused:
 
How does one “make up” what you term “nothing”? If I were simply being obtuse, then you would be justified in cautioning me that there is “none so blind as those who will not see”, but since my vision is corrected to 20/20…🤷
You are making up a claim that there is a non-prudential reason to vote for Obama over Romney. I don’t believe it exists, which is why I believe you aren’t sharing it.
 
That’s where faith in your fellow man comes in, even if they disagree with the things you believe are done with the best of intensions. Just a little patience in understanding with differing points of view would help.

I must say though Matt, as many discussions as you and I have been in, and usually on opposite sides of the aurgumant :D, you always do just exactly that. We do disagree but you always seem fair in your evaluations of comments.
Just “usually”? 😛 Anyway Deacon, thank you for your kind words about me here. God’s continued blessings to you and peace be with you.
 
You are making up a claim that there is a non-prudential reason to vote for Obama over Romney. I don’t believe it exists, which is why I believe you aren’t sharing it.
You believe it doesn’t, I believe it does…what’s the problem? Naturally, our brains aren’t synced at the same main frame. 🤷
 
You believe it doesn’t, I believe it does…what’s the problem? Naturally, our brains aren’t synced at the same main frame. 🤷
I’m glad you believe the prudential reason that you believe exists exists. :rolleyes: I just wish you would share it. Since you don’t, there is no reason for anyone to believe you…other than you. I’m sure the Obama sycophants will, though. They don’t need to hear the details.
 
Apparently, there are secret messages that only Republicans (and Carlan) can hear, whenever a Republican leader speaks publicly.
Well, she was responding to Deacon Lapey’s post about cash for clunkers.

I don’t get the connection. 😊

Carlan, could you clue me in, please?
 
What is a dog whistle and a code message?
40.png
Lapey:
Please help me understand this code and how does a dog whistle matter, we can’t even hear it? HELP!!!
Add me to the list of those who don’t understand the allusion. :confused:
 
You’re not a shabby thinker either, not by a long shot, and here we are both scratching our heads over this one. 🙂
I’m confused too. The RNC never issued me any dog whistles upon receipt of my annual dues. Maybe you need to donate extra money…
 
This is just the English Major in me (not the “fraternal correction” component):

It’s tongue-in-cheek. (Not “and”)

As in, “His tongue was firmly implanted in his cheek.”
 
I’m confused too. The RNC never issued me any dog whistles upon receipt of my annual dues. Maybe you need to donate extra money…
Look at your membership card. There should be a small drawing of a dog whistle in red in the upper right hand corner that you can refer to to have a whistle issued to you.
 
Look at your membership card. There should be a small drawing of a dog whistle in red in the upper right hand corner that you can refer to to have a whistle issued to you.
Typical lawyer. I never read the fine print when it comes to my own stuff.
 
Well, she was responding to Deacon Lapey’s post about cash for clunkers.

I don’t get the connection. 😊

Carlan, could you clue me in, please?
I think he was actually referring to estebob’s comment that Cash for Clunkers removed a lot of Obama/Biden bumperstickers from the road as well.
 
Hopefully Romney wins not obama. For the sake of the Church alone… and all the unborn :o.
I look forward to seeing your reaction after the election results. Can you fix the results this way after they are out???
 
I think he was actually referring to estebob’s comment that Cash for Clunkers removed a lot of Obama/Biden bumperstickers from the road as well.
Okay. But where do dog whistles come in? :confused: :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top