O'Bama's Gamble 02 - 14

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catherine_S
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Public Religion Institute poll on Catholics and the HHS mandate is not credible - it was sponsored by Planned Parenthood.

I agree with Michael Voris wholeheartedly on the bad wording in the Faithful Citizenship document, and with the purification of the Church that is needed.
 
Even if the poll is innaccurate, it is still fact that a large portion of American Catholics are nominal–they do not follow some key Catholic teachings, which is a result of a lack of proper education–so Voris’s point still retains legitimacy.
 
If this is** true** there will definately be** rough** days ahead!!
The Public Religion Institute poll on Catholics and the HHS mandate is not credible - it was sponsored by Planned Parenthood.

I agree with Michael Voris wholeheartedly on the bad wording in the Faithful Citizenship document, and with the purification of the Church that is needed.
While all polls should be taken with a grain of salt (or, in some cases, a spoonful) due to the spin that goes into the wording of questions, there is an underlying truth that is more opportunity than obstacle.

The opportunity is this: the minds that need to be changed to have an impact are Catholic minds! The bishops don’t need to convince Protestants or secularists. They need to convince the Catholics in their own pews.

The prospect of jail will motivate them to do so.
 
I do not understand what your point is, Tarpeian Rock?
The use of O + apostrophe in a name (O’Shea, O’Hara) signifies an Irish name.

The name Obama has no apostrophe, and the second letter is not capitalized.

I was going to say something else, but I will self-edit.
 
The use of O + apostrophe in a name (O’Shea, O’Hara) signifies an Irish name.

The name Obama has no apostrophe, and the second letter is not capitalized.

I was going to say something else, but I will self-edit.
What he said. I was just going for a chuckle here, is all.
 
Rasmussen poll today stated that 59% of RC’s disapprove of the President’s job-among likely voters.

queue Happy Trails to You
 
It is! However, I hate to put a damper on it, but there are so many within my own parish that are sooooo pro Obama still! They just don’t get it. Guess they’re getting their info from MSNBC and the NYT.:rolleyes::mad:
 
It is! However, I hate to put a damper on it, but there are so many within my own parish that are sooooo pro Obama still! They just don’t get it. Guess they’re getting their info from MSNBC and the NYT.:rolleyes::mad:
The Lord is still in the boat :yup:!!
Some trails are
* happy** ones…*
Others are blue…
It’s the way you ride the
* trail** that counts…*
And here’s* a happy one** for you…*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgw_yprN_-w&feature=related
 
😃

We Catholics have picked the winner in every election since 1980. Again, looking good:)
Not quite. Bush #1 received onlly 47% of the Catholic vote. Here is the list since 1952:

1952 Eisenhower / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 52%

1956 Eisenhower / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 46%

1960 Kennedy / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 82%

1964 Johnson / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 79%

1968 Nixon / Republican/ Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 37%

1972 Nixon & Ford / Republican/ Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 59%

1976 Carter / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 57%

1980 Reagan / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 50%

1984 Reagan / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 54%

1988 Bush 1/ Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 47%

1992 Clinton / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 50%

1996 Clinton / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 55%

2000 Bush 2 / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 50%

2004 Bush 2 / Republican / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 51%

2008 Obama / Democratic / Catholics vote for winner in percentage: 54%

The strong point to make is that it is proved by history that it is very difficult to win the Presidency without at least 50% of the Catholic vote. Of the fifteen elections listed, only three winers had less than 50% of the Catholic vote, and one of them (Nixon) would go on to a second term with large help of the Catholic vote.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top