"Obedience"

  • Thread starter Thread starter guiltyofdoubt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So you’re saying that it’s better not to be created at all, rather than be created “with conditions?”
Absolutely not. The difference between you and I is that the nonexistence of free will doesn’t concern me in the slightest. Which brings us back around to the point: Since free will is illusory, God really doesn’t have an excuse for a lackluster universe.
 
Absolutely not. The difference between you and I is that the nonexistence of free will doesn’t concern me in the slightest. Which brings us back around to the point: Since free will is illusory, God really doesn’t have an excuse for a lackluster universe.
So did you have the free will to write the above post, or was it a deterministic result of the basic laws of physics?
 
So did you have the free will to write the above post, or was it a deterministic result of the basic laws of physics?
I would say it’s the latter, though there may be some uncertainty due to quantum effects.
 
I would say it’s the latter, though there may be some uncertainty due to quantum effects.
So it appears that you believe that you have no effect on what happens in your life. Your choices are meaningless, because they aren’t really your choices. I guess that’s where you were coming from originally.

It is my hope that you find God and trust in him. t’s possible that you (and I and many others) have been over-thinking this whole issue. I’ve heard it said (I don’t remember where - or maybe I’m inventing it on the fly…) that there are more saints in the ghettos than in the philosophy (and theology) departments of our universities. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain God. The ghetto folks don’t even try to, and rather go on faith, which is the right answer. The university folks spend their lives “not yet convinced” and end up missing the whole point that outside of heaven, we can’t know God or his ways fully.
 
So it appears that you believe that you have no effect on what happens in your life. Your choices are meaningless, because they aren’t really your choices. I guess that’s where you were coming from originally.

It is my hope that you find God and trust in him. t’s possible that you (and I and many others) have been over-thinking this whole issue. I’ve heard it said (I don’t remember where - or maybe I’m inventing it on the fly…) that there are more saints in the ghettos than in the philosophy (and theology) departments of our universities. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain God. The ghetto folks don’t even try to, and rather go on faith, which is the right answer. The university folks spend their lives “not yet convinced” and end up missing the whole point that outside of heaven, we can’t know God or his ways fully.
Well said. 👍
 
I have read it over and over again on these forums…that God created us to love Him, and to be Obedient. That we must “serve” Him.

Then its said we have free will.

That we can “choose” not to serve Him or be obedient.

But then we are punished. So its not really free will. We didn’t have free will in whether we wanted to exist in the first place. So we are thrust into this situation without choice, created pawns in a game of “Do what I say, or Burn eternally”.

There are good people who sin…but there is such rigidity in Catholicism and what it teaches, that if you don’t follow the prescribed steps exactly, then you are doomed to Hell.

We are essentially dogs. We either heel, or get slapped by the Master with a newspaper, only that slapping goes on forever.

Holiness is supposedly what brings us “true happiness”. If that were so, then why isn’t it so obvious to everyone that they’d want to pursue it?
The Catechism teaches that God made His universe “in statu viae”, in a state of journeying to perfection. It’s a process, of the divine Potter molding His creation, not without it’s cooperation, into the finished product He has in mind, as we come, over time, to agree and align ourselves with His flawless will. Our justice would be complete as we freely come to fulfill the greatest commandments: to love God with our whole heart, soul, mind, and strength and our neighbor as ourselves. I like a quote from St Basil:
**If we turn away from evil out of fear of punishment, we are in the position of slaves. If we pursue the enticement of wages, . . . we resemble mercenaries. Finally if we obey for the sake of the good itself and out of love for him who commands . . . we are in the position of children.

**
 
I have read it over and over again on these forums…that God created us to love Him, and to be Obedient. That we must “serve” Him.

Then its said we have free will.

That we can “choose” not to serve Him or be obedient.

But then we are punished. So its not really free will. We didn’t have free will in whether we wanted to exist in the first place. So we are thrust into this situation without choice, created pawns in a game of “Do what I say, or Burn eternally”.

There are good people who sin…but there is such rigidity in Catholicism and what it teaches, that if you don’t follow the prescribed steps exactly, then you are doomed to Hell.

We are essentially dogs. We either heel, or get slapped by the Master with a newspaper, only that slapping goes on forever.

Holiness is supposedly what brings us “true happiness”. If that were so, then why isn’t it so obvious to everyone that they’d want to pursue it?
You are at a disadvantage to understand where Christians are coming from. We know that the human will is weakened by original sin. You don’t have this belief, but have you noticed that sometimes you do what you really don’t want to do? Then there are times when you want to do then you don’t do. This shows a weakness in our wills effected by our lack of moral strength, and the influence of our uncontrolable passions. Sometimes under the influence of this weakness we actually punish ourselves, not God but then in our ignorance we blame Him. You portray God, and perhaps we do too, as a dominating God, not a compassionate understanding God If we do we do by accident, but I think we have portrayed Him as a loving God. No matter of argument is capable of giving you the faith, and we know it too, although in our desire to help you understand, we try Holiness is a gift from God, it is His Holy Spirit at work in us, we don’t make ourselves holy. Co-operating with the grace of God means to go against our self-will, our self-love, our pride, and our ignorance, in order to prove our love and desire for God, to be found worthy of Him and His love. We grow in holiness by doing His Will, we strive as Christians to unite our wills with His, to become one with Him, and that means a lot of dying to our selves, a lot of self-sacrifice. Thats not always easy, and we rely on Him to sustain us with His faith, hope, and love. His redemptive grace, Amazing Grace. When you receive it you will find answers to your questions, and understand what others have been trying to tell you. Until that time you may remain an atheist and agnostic, not knowing and hating God.
 
You are at a disadvantage to understand where Christians are coming from. We know that the human will is weakened by original sin. You don’t have this belief, but have you noticed that sometimes you do what you really don’t want to do? Then there are times when you want to do then you don’t do. This shows a weakness in our wills effected by our lack of moral strength, and the influence of our uncontrolable passions. Sometimes under the influence of this weakness we actually punish ourselves, not God but then in our ignorance we blame Him. You portray God, and perhaps we do too, as a dominating God, not a compassionate understanding God If we do we do by accident, but I think we have portrayed Him as a loving God. No matter of argument is capable of giving you the faith, and we know it too, although in our desire to help you understand, we try Holiness is a gift from God, it is His Holy Spirit at work in us, we don’t make ourselves holy. Co-operating with the grace of God means to go against our self-will, our self-love, our pride, and our ignorance, in order to prove our love and desire for God, to be found worthy of Him and His love. We grow in holiness by doing His Will, we strive as Christians to unite our wills with His, to become one with Him, and that means a lot of dying to our selves, a lot of self-sacrifice. Thats not always easy, and we rely on Him to sustain us with His faith, hope, and love. His redemptive grace, Amazing Grace. When you receive it you will find answers to your questions, and understand what others have been trying to tell you. Until that time you may remain an atheist and agnostic, not knowing and hating God.
I don’t consider myself an atheist or an agnostic, though I have tendencies to think that some of their arguments are logical.

My problem is more of “I’m just not sure what is Truth, and what to believe”, and though I understand that on a Catholic board, the majority will obviously think and believe there is no argument against the apparent Truth of the Catholic Faith, I would simply answer that I am envious that you are able to have such Faith and unquestioning belief and loyalty, because I am tortured mentally by my doubt.
 
So you’re saying that it’s better not to be created at all, rather than be created “with conditions?”
I would, especially if those conditions could lead to eternal damnation.

I also don’t understand why all of mankind must suffer because of Adam and Eve.

An omnipotent and omniscient God could have started over, and certainly designed things in a way so that man wouldn’t have been tempted by Satan in the first place.

Not that He would have to “start over”, actually…because He knew what was going to happen from the beginning and let it occur anyway, and so He could have designed it differently from the beginning, but chose not to. As the Creator, I guess that’s His prerogative, and I as the created have no say, but then it still is the reason so many question God today, as He created us with reason and curiosity and logic, and life does ring of being a game for His pleasure…
 
I would, especially if those conditions could lead to eternal damnation.
None of the conditions lead to eternal damnation. It is our choices, and only our choices, the lead to damnation. God has guaranteed that sufficient graces are available to all can make the choices necessary to get to heaven
I also don’t understand why all of mankind must suffer because of Adam and Eve.
I believe you may be missing one or more messages in the story of Adam and Eve. Do you think any of us would do substantially differently? Our free will makes us susceptible to the temptation to think we are smarter than God, and decide on our own what is good and evil.
An omnipotent and omniscient God could have started over, and certainly designed things in a way so that man wouldn’t have been tempted by Satan in the first place.
Since God is perfect and makes no mistakes, there can be no starting over.
Not that He would have to “start over”, actually…because He knew what was going to happen from the beginning and let it occur anyway, and so He could have designed it differently from the beginning, but chose not to. As the Creator, I guess that’s His prerogative, and I as the created have no say, but then it still is the reason so many question God today, as He created us with reason and curiosity and logic, and life does ring of being a game for His pleasure…
It is pretty clear to me that most who question God do so because they didn’t, and don’t, get things their way.

Why don’t we use our reason, curiosity and logic to choose good rather than evil?
 
None of the conditions lead to eternal damnation. It is our choices, and only our choices, the lead to damnation. God has guaranteed that sufficient graces are available to all can make the choices necessary to get to heaven

I believe you may be missing one or more messages in the story of Adam and Eve. Do you think any of us would do substantially differently? Our free will makes us susceptible to the temptation to think we are smarter than God, and decide on our own what is good and evil.

Since God is perfect and makes no mistakes, there can be no starting over.

It is pretty clear to me that most who question God do so because they didn’t, and don’t, get things their way.

Why don’t we use our reason, curiosity and logic to choose good rather than evil?
You are playing semantics. “Choices” vs. “Conditions”. The conditions lead to the choices. They are inseparable.

As far as doing something differently…God put 2 NAIVE newly made people someplace with no concept of Satan and lies and then allows Satan to LIE TO THEM…how would they have any IDEA that the serpent was Satan?? So I guess if you’re saying that none of us would do differently in that situation, then maybe you’re right if we were all NAIVE in the same fashion. God could have said to them “Watch out for the Deceiver who will try and trick you into disobeying me”, since we know He was conversing with them. That didn’t happen, at least as far as scripture tells us.

So acknowledging that God is perfect and makes no mistakes, and knowing that He knows what each and every one of us will do, THEN we can infer that God is perfectly OK with most of the planet…most of His creation…being damned.
 
You are playing semantics. “Choices” vs. “Conditions”. The conditions lead to the choices. They are inseparable.
Our will is always free to go against what the conditions might suggest. We are not automatons. Our choices are not predetermined. It is not semantics. Choice and condition have clearly different meanings. Conditions influence choices. It is only weakness of will that allows conditions to determine choices.
As far as doing something differently…God put 2 NAIVE newly made people someplace with no concept of Satan and lies and then allows Satan to LIE TO THEM…how would they have any IDEA that the serpent was Satan??
Where does Genesis say they were naïve? They had clear directions as to what was acceptable and what was not.
So I guess if you’re saying that none of us would do differently in that situation, then maybe you’re right if we were all NAIVE in the same fashion. God could have said to them “Watch out for the Deceiver who will try and trick you into disobeying me”, since we know He was conversing with them. That didn’t happen, at least as far as scripture tells us.
So acknowledging that God is perfect and makes no mistakes, and knowing that He knows what each and every one of us will do, THEN we can infer that God is perfectly OK with most of the planet…most of His creation…being damned.
On what evidence do you presume this? Where is it stated the most are being damned?
 
Our will is always free to go against what the conditions might suggest. We are not automatons. Our choices are not predetermined. It is not semantics. Choice and condition have clearly different meanings. Conditions influence choices. It is only weakness of will that allows conditions to determine choices.

Where does Genesis say they were naïve? They had clear directions as to what was acceptable and what was not.

On what evidence do you presume this? Where is it stated the most are being damned?
Our choices are not predetermined - to us…BUT GOD KNOWS WHAT OUR CHOICES WILL BE BEFORE WE DO! He already knows our life, and our fate!

As for Adam and Eve, let’s substitute “naive” for “innocent”, to get my meaning across. They had never been exposed to the likes of Satan. God KNEW Satan was there, waiting to tempt, obviously. The consequences were also unclear to Adam and Eve - meaning the gravity of their error - their DISOBEDIENCE. They didn’t just walk by the tree and say to themselves “gee, I think we should ignore God and eat this fruit just because”. NO…they were tricked into it by a being that they had no experience with, nor knowledge of. Why would they believe a talking snake? Why wouldn’t they? Its all very ambiguous. Now this is all going by literal reading of Genesis. Perhaps there is more that happened which is not told in the scripture, but it seems to me that those would be very important points.

As far as my presumption of most being damned…If nobody gets to Heaven except through the Son, and furthermore by following the Catholic Church and its Way, then that leaves what…2.18 billion Christians, of which 1.18 billion are Catholic, out of over 7 billion people. And we know not all of those “Catholics” and “Christians” would be saved if we are to trust the teachings of the Church in what it takes to get to Heaven.

Now of course there are those who are ignorant of Christianity, though in this day and age that number is dwindling, but perhaps they would be saved. And even the Church says we cannot know for sure who is damned and who is in heaven…except they say that the Saints are in Heaven for sure…a claim I find to be a bit presumptive. But the Bible says the road to Hell is wide, and the Gates to Heaven narrow.

All of what I stated point to a majority being damned…or at the very least a whole lot.
 
Our choices are not predetermined - to us…BUT GOD KNOWS WHAT OUR CHOICES WILL BE BEFORE WE DO! He already knows our life, and our fate!

As for Adam and Eve, let’s substitute “naive” for “innocent”, to get my meaning across. They had never been exposed to the likes of Satan. God KNEW Satan was there, waiting to tempt, obviously. The consequences were also unclear to Adam and Eve - meaning the gravity of their error - their DISOBEDIENCE. They didn’t just walk by the tree and say to themselves “gee, I think we should ignore God and eat this fruit just because”. NO…they were tricked into it by a being that they had no experience with, nor knowledge of. Why would they believe a talking snake? Why wouldn’t they? Its all very ambiguous. Now this is all going by literal reading of Genesis. Perhaps there is more that happened which is not told in the scripture, but it seems to me that those would be very important points.

As far as my presumption of most being damned…If nobody gets to Heaven except through the Son, and furthermore by following the Catholic Church and its Way, then that leaves what…2.18 billion Christians, of which 1.18 billion are Catholic, out of over 7 billion people. And we know not all of those “Catholics” and “Christians” would be saved if we are to trust the teachings of the Church in what it takes to get to Heaven.

Now of course there are those who are ignorant of Christianity, though in this day and age that number is dwindling, but perhaps they would be saved. And even the Church says we cannot know for sure who is damned and who is in heaven…except they say that the Saints are in Heaven for sure…a claim I find to be a bit presumptive. But the Bible says the road to Hell is wide, and the Gates to Heaven narrow.

All of what I stated point to a majority being damned…or at the very least a whole lot.
The basic message of Adam/Eve is that they freely chose to trust in something God created (the fruit and/or Satan) rather than Himself. They knew God intimately in the garden. They walked with God. They had knowledge and intellect, and abilities far beyond ours. Nonetheless, they were tempted to be like God, but without God involved.

God gave them the chance to repent, which they failed to do.

These are the same choices we must make. Our choices, freely made, determine our fate. Our choice to sin or not. Our choice to repent or not.
 
I also don’t understand why all of mankind must suffer because of Adam and Eve.
Say, for example, you have an extremely wealthy grandfather. He’s got billions and billions. And he wants all of his grandchildren to share in it. You think, that’s terrific, eventually I will inherit a lot.

So your grandfather dies, and leaves it all to your father, for him to pass along. Unfortunately, your father takes a trip to sin city (Vegas), and loses it all at roulette.

You scream, that’s not fair!! Why should I suffer because of a mistake my father made.
 
As far as my presumption of most being damned…If nobody gets to Heaven except through the Son, and furthermore by following the Catholic Church and its Way, then that leaves what…2.18 billion Christians, of which 1.18 billion are Catholic, out of over 7 billion people. And we know not all of those “Catholics” and “Christians” would be saved if we are to trust the teachings of the Church in what it takes to get to Heaven.

Now of course there are those who are ignorant of Christianity, though in this day and age that number is dwindling, but perhaps they would be saved. And even the Church says we cannot know for sure who is damned and who is in heaven…except they say that the Saints are in Heaven for sure…a claim I find to be a bit presumptive. But the Bible says the road to Hell is wide, and the Gates to Heaven narrow.

All of what I stated point to a majority being damned…or at the very least a whole lot.
From the Catechism:

1260 "Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery."63 Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity.
 
So your grandfather dies, and leaves it all to your father, for him to pass along. Unfortunately, your father takes a trip to sin city (Vegas), and loses it all at roulette.

You scream, that’s not fair!! Why should I suffer because of a mistake my father made.
And I would say it’s the grandfather’s mistake that caused this. If he wanted his grandchildren to have the money, he could have left such a provision in his will. Indeed, he probably should have known his son well enough to realize that he’d waste the money to begin with.
 
I can tell that you’re frustrated that God doesn’t make himself more visible. I don’t have a quick answer for that in general (there are others who do).

If you are arguing that “free will” is not really “free” (because there can be dire consequences), I think there is just confusion about what free will actually means. I know it has been said before, but when we talk about “free will”, it’s more in the sense of “not being robots”. Rather than “no dire consequences.”

One way to look at this is to look at those things in creation that do NOT have free will. For example, the planets cannot just decide not to orbit the sun, and go off in another direction. Gravity cannot just decide to be repulsive rather than attractive. Dogs cannot just decide never to bark at cats. For these examples, these creatures have a “nature” that they cannot change. They do not have free will. They are like robots which are programmed always to do “the right thing.”

Among all creatures (that is, all created things), only man has free will. (The angels did initially, but that’s another story). Man does have a “nature”, but unlike anything else in creation, man can choose NOT to follow his nature. Our nature is to trust in God, and to love God.

But for there to be trust and love, there must be a possibility of not-trust and not-love. Love must be chosen, it cannot be forced.

You can’t choose “not God” and then expect the benefits that God provides. You can’t choose not-God and expect a heavenly existence when God IS the heavenly existence.

Out of love, God allows us to love him back. It is not forced. We have “free will” to choose against our own nature, and our own interests. And it is only in the presence of a choice (temptation) against these things that a choice for these things is meaningful.

There is absolutely, positively no way we can “know” God on earth. God is too complicated for us to even begin to comprehend, or analyze. So yes, we must choose with less information than we might like…

uh-oh. I’m rambling again. Sorry.
I liked the way you describe this and to be honest, it does make better sense to me now.

Thanks!
 
I liked the way you describe this and to be honest, it does make better sense to me now.

Thanks!
No thanks required. But I’m delighted that somebody other than myself actually understands what I wrote. That isn’t always the case 🙂
 
The problems of understanding free will and predestination have a long history. God is all knowing. God is the Creator of time and not subject to it. The only reality to the past lies in human memory, the future lies in the human imagination.For humans the present is all we have. That present is not static, it is dynamic, ever changing. In God all is present, unchanging, absolute and complete. I Am Who Am, I Am Existence I give existence to all things. I Am the beginning and the end of all things created.

Predestination is a term to signify the effects of Gods’ saving grace upon the life of man and his choices without interferring with his freedom of will ( as if our finite minds unaided can contemplate the infinite Mind of God)

If free will did not exist and human experience does show that some humans are good, and some are evil, sinful (disobedient to Gods’ will) and God created them to be that way, then God becomes the Author of confusion and sin. This would manifest a contradiction in God, which is an impossibility. God is truth, if He contradicts Himself He is the opposite, a liar, and truth is non-existence. If Truth is non-existence then we don’t exist. What exists is truth The idea of no free will is fatalistic, hopeless. Satan would love for you to believe there is no free will. God gave us free will to be like Him, thank you Lord.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top