C
cothrige
Guest
Okay, I can see what you are getting at there, though I still have a hard time believing God would engage in such acts. Assuming you are right in your basic position that God doesn’t want such proof, I can’t help but think he could have provided some other means for carrying things out than actually having to cover up any archaeological remains left behind by a culture. For instance, it would seem that simply allowing archaeological evidence to be discovered a couple of hundred years ago could have done it just fine.Cothrige,
I think I can see your point, but the Dead Sea Scrolls and similar other archeological finds haven’t proven religious truths, at least not to the extent of showing which religion is true. They allow for a diversity of beliefs. But archeological evidence supporting the Book of Mormon would be an entirely different matter. It would be a “proof” that would disallow the operation of faith because it would “prove” that Joseph Smith did what he said he did. God is simply not going to do that. It defeats His purpose. It does not comply with 1 Corinthians 2.
And, more to the point, I would have a hard time accepting your position regarding proof of a religion. I don’t think that such agrees with what has been revealed countless times in the scriptures. Consider all the many people who witnessed Christ’s miracles. They saw first-hand what he could do, and much more directly than an old coin would do now. And, it might be noted that many still didn’t or wouldn’t believe, even then, and Christ castigated them for it you may recall. But, God still revealed himself to them. In the Old Testament Elias brought down fire out of heaven in a very public God-to-god showdown. That doesn’t seem to fit at all with your perceived restriction on public confirmation of faith. I just see no reason to suspect that God insists on hiding himself from public knowledge. And I believe that even in the face of such archaeological evidence, unless a person respond to grace they will still persist in unbelief. I don’t think you can prove God even with such things. Human doubt will always find a way.
I understand. I respect that entirely, and I agree. Biblical archaeology has, I am confident, never brought even one person to belief. Evidence exists of the Hebrew people, and that doesn’t prove God or their faith in the least. Miracles are also all around us, one need only look. So I just don’t see the need for any divine cover-up in the first place.I am not trying to prove the Book of Mormon to you or anyone. I am saying that it is going to take a different expectation for anyone who wants to read the Book of Mormon than the kind of evidence they would seek using archeology.