Once Saved--Always Saved

  • Thread starter Thread starter TPJCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason OSAS Christians would prefer that you not be Catholic is because they would say that the Catholic Church does not clearly present the gospel according to their view of what the gospel is. Accordingly, they admit that whereas it’s possible for a Catholic to be saved, that Catholic would have to wade through a lot of non-Biblical teaching to find the “true” gospel. In other words, they would say that very few Catholics actually have accepted Jesus by their formula.

Therefore, they want us out of Rome and into a good “Bible-believing church.”
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
Challenge:
why would believers in OSAS care if people are Catholic? After all, if all it takes is accepting Jesus, and nothing at all can separate us from God once we have done that–then it really does not matter what we choose to follow–correct?
What are you waiting to hear? Someone to defend the indefensible? You have to be unreasonable to claim you could have faith that Jesus is God and Savior, yet live a life that serves Satan, and still maintain that just because you believe in Him you will go to heaven–who is gonna step up and defend that? Let alone have someone explain cogently an obvious contradiction in their belief system–i.e. OSAS / and “Catholics aren’t “saved” because of their other beliefs contrary to mine.”

And if someone did, how long would that person last before the weight of Catholic Truth descended on him here in these forums squashing his weak claim?

What I’d like to hear is someone explain Romans 5 from the OSAS point of view…but then…it is *your *thread…🙂 Maybe I’ll start my own…
 
The gift of salvation + never being sure if you’re going to heaven = no peace at all
Attempting to be “sure” of God’s judgements is claiming omniscience.
God allows us free will - this gives us the freedom to reject Him even after we have come to “believe” in Him.
Are you saying He doesn’t have the power to allow people this choice because of the “once saved always saved” rule?

As for the original question…

Since catholics believe in Jesus, and accept Him as their personal savior, then by the standards of OSAS they should always be saved regardless of whether the perform good works - or not.
It isn’t like performing good works should negate OSAS.
 
40.png
Mijoy2:
I’ve often wondered this same thing. It appears you can draw a salvation matirix.

If Evangelical Protestants are 100% correct = Protestants/ Catholics saved. Rest of world doomed.

If Catholics are 100% correct = Catholics saved (if in sanctified grace, which most are not) Protestants and rest of the world have a good shot at it if either contrite in their repentance or in invincible ignorance.

If Some other Protestant groups are correct (oneness Pentecostal and some others who believe we must be submerged in Baptism) the vast majority of the world are doomed.

If Islam is 100% correct = Most of the world is saved but ALL Christians are doomed (because we believe in the Holy Trinity).

From a purley objective standpoint (i.e. a totally unbiased observer learning of religion for the first time). the odds are heavily stacked against all of us. It becomes obvious why people shun religion (IMO).
Mijoy,

I must correct one point in what you are saying. In the case of Protestants there can only be ignorance of the teachings of the Catholic Church, but not invincible ignorance.

Invincible ignorance refers only to those who have not been baptized and have never heard the Gospel message but somehow they have the law of God on their hearts.

It is a totally different ballgame

Maggie
 
40.png
neophyte:
Mickey,
I think that c0ach posted that as an explanation of what someone else might say if he were here, not as a representation of his own thought.

c0ach, in return we’d tell that person that he didn’t understand Catholic teaching.
Forgive me coach. I misunderstood your post.

:o
 
Invincible ignorance refers only to those who have not been baptized and have never heard the Gospel message but somehow they have the law of God on their hearts.

It is a totally different ballgame
Maggie, either you are infallible, this is untrue, or this is just your opinion. I opt for the last two.

There are many threads on the definition of invincible ignorance out there that I suggest you read. This is one of the many problems with this doctrine. There are many different opinions among Catholics as to what “invinvible ignorance is.” Right?

Some would say:
  1. Invincible ignorance is when a person is so hard hearted that he cannot understand the truth because of false info.
  2. Some would say that it refers to only those who have not heard through no fault of their own.
  3. Others would say that it refers to those who, like me, have heard and understood, but are unconvinced of the truth of Catholicism.
At least you can say that your is only one of many opinions in this essential matter that not many Catholic agree upon.

That is one of the many troubles with fallible people interpreting and infallible Magisterium.

Michael
 
40.png
Curious:
The gift of salvation + fear you can lose it at any time = no security at all
Curious,

Continue to work it out with fear and trembling, and you’ll be okay!

🙂
 
Catholics who think “Eternal Security” means to **all **Protestants that one need ONLY believe in Jesus to go to heaven regardles of living an unrepentant sinful life are just like Protestants who think all Catholics believe that all those crying Mary statues are authentic–or that Mary herself answers prayer with miracles. Some Catholics with limited understanding may believe that–but most don’t–just like some Protestants believe no matter how you live your life, Jesus will save you–I think most believe that if you sincerely love Christ with an authentic change of heart–it would be impossible to be completely unrepentant. (WOW–huge run-on sentence…sorry).

I think it’s mostly a matter of semantics…
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
But the OSAS doctrine merely states that one has to accept Jesus into their lives as their Lord and Savior–and really mean it…(whatever “really mean it” means).
The way that I see it, the OSAS doctrine means that one can pay lip-service to God, and claim to have accepted Jesus as Lord and Saviour but continue to do the same things as before. Of course now that the person is “saved” then it is an easy ride on the roller coaster because nothing will ever happen to the person. He or she knows that when the spirit departs the body, and he or she goes before the Judge all he has to do is look at Jesus and plead the blood of Christ.

I wonder if that will do any good, since nothing impure can enter into heaven.

Maggie
 
40.png
michaelp:
Maggie, either you are infallible, this is untrue, or this is just your opinion. I opt for the last two.

There are many threads on the definition of invincible ignorance out there that I suggest you read. This is one of the many problems with this doctrine. There are many different opinions among Catholics as to what “invinvible ignorance is.” Right?

Some would say:
  1. Invincible ignorance is when a person is so hard hearted that he cannot understand the truth because of false info.
  2. Some would say that it refers to only those who have not heard through no fault of their own.
  3. Others would say that it refers to those who, like me, have heard and understood, but are unconvinced of the truth of Catholicism.
At least you can say that your is only one of many opinions in this essential matter that not many Catholic agree upon.

That is one of the many troubles with fallible people interpreting and infallible Magisterium.

Michael
I am not infallible, and it is not at all nice to attack other people based upon what could be your own poor understanding of the teachings of the Catholic Church. I am saying that you do not understand what is written in the Catechism. Invincible ignorance does not apply to those who have heard the Gospel message. It is merely ignorance of all the truths of the Scripture.

Invincible Ignorance as I have always understood the argument is related to the Baptism of desire. It refers to those who have not heard the Gospel message.

As I understand the teachings of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, Protestants are considered to be our brothers and sisters in Christ who know the Truth but no the fullness of Truth. Invincible ignorance does not come into this equation.

This is getting off the topic of the thread. If you wish to attack me or at least discuss the correct understanding of the doctrine of invincible ignorance then I suggest that this is taken to another thread.
 
Steven Merten:
Hello Mickey,

I think that it is more clear to say

Catholics believe the only way to heaven is through the saving grace of Jesus Christ, the reason people go to heaven is because they love God and love for God is accomplished through free from the will of God obedience to the will of God.

Where the Protestant theology fails is that it denies human free willed gifts of love and obedience to God that Jesus called for in order to go to heaven. Protestant theology fails to acknowledge that man posesses post baptism free willed choices to love or hate God through obedience or disobedience to God which Jesus teaches us effects whether or not we go to heaven.

NAB MAT 25:41

Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.’ Then they will answer and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’ He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’ And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

NAB MAT 19:16


“Teacher, what good must I do to possess everlasting life?” He answered, “Why do you question me about what is good? There is One who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments." “Which ones?” he asked. Jesus replied “You shall not kill”; ‘You shall not commit adultery’; ‘You shall not steal’; ‘You shall not bear false witness’; ‘Honor your father and mother’; and ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”

NAB JOH 14:23Jesus answered:

Anyone who loves me will be true to my word, and my Father will love him; we will come to him and make our dwelling place with him. He who does not love me does not keep my words. Yet the word you hear is not mine; it comes from the Father who sent me.

NAB SIR 15:11 Man’s Free Will.

Say not: “It was God’s doing that I fell away”; for what he hates he does not do. Say not: “It was he who set me astray”; for he has no need of wicked man.
Abominable wickedness the LORD hates, he does not let it befall those who fear him. When God, in the beginning, created man, he made him subject to his own free choice. If you choose you can keep the commandments; it is loyalty to do his will. There are set before you fire and water; to whichever you choose, stretch forth your hand. Before man are life and death, whichever he chooses shall be given him.

Peace in Christ,

Steven Merten
www.ILOVEYOUGOD.com

This is really excellent work. Thank you.

Maggie
 
40.png
c0achmcguirk:
Tell that to Jimmy Akin, Augustine, and Aquinas, all believers and adamant defenders of predestination.

cin.org/users/james/files/loss.htm

Look at the Bible and how often predestination is mentioned:

biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=predestined&x=0&y=0

I don’t know if you understand the Catholic position on predestination yet, much less the Scriptural basis for it. Keep studying. 🙂

God bless,
c0ach
The difference between the Calvinist system of TULIP and that of St. Augustine, St. Paul and St. Thomas Aquinas is that the Calvinist system preaches double predestination.

A proper reading of St. Paul’s letters reveals that he does not teach what is taught by Calvinist theology. There are many errors that can be exposed in the thought of Calvin.

However, TULIP and Predestination is not the same as OSAS which is the subject of this thread.

Maggie
 
40.png
MaggieOH:
I am not infallible, and it is not at all nice to attack other people based upon what could be your own poor understanding of the teachings of the Catholic Church. I am saying that you do not understand what is written in the Catechism. Invincible ignorance does not apply to those who have heard the Gospel message. It is merely ignorance of all the truths of the Scripture.

Invincible Ignorance as I have always understood the argument is related to the Baptism of desire. It refers to those who have not heard the Gospel message.

As I understand the teachings of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, Protestants are considered to be our brothers and sisters in Christ who know the Truth but no the fullness of Truth. Invincible ignorance does not come into this equation.

This is getting off the topic of the thread. If you wish to attack me or at least discuss the correct understanding of the doctrine of invincible ignorance then I suggest that this is taken to another thread.
Maggie, just because people don’t agree with your points of discussion or counter them does not mean that they are “attacking” you. This is a place for discussion and debate. Don’t think that your statement won’t go unchallenged. If you believe I am being uncharitable in my arguments, please let me know, but don’t take a strong disagreement as an attack. I respect you and your opinions, but they are not the only ones out here on the web.

I will bow out once again.

😉
Michael
 
40.png
michaelp:
Maggie, either you are infallible, this is untrue, or this is just your opinion. I opt for the last two.

There are many threads on the definition of invincible ignorance out there that I suggest you read. This is one of the many problems with this doctrine. There are many different opinions among Catholics as to what “invinvible ignorance is.” Right?

Some would say:
  1. Invincible ignorance is when a person is so hard hearted that he cannot understand the truth because of false info.
  2. Some would say that it refers to only those who have not heard through no fault of their own.
  3. Others would say that it refers to those who, like me, have heard and understood, but are unconvinced of the truth of Catholicism.
At least you can say that your is only one of many opinions in this essential matter that not many Catholic agree upon.

That is one of the many troubles with fallible people interpreting and infallible Magisterium.

Michael
Mp the correct answer according to actual Catholic teaching is # 2 all the rest are mistakes. :cool:
 
40.png
c0achmcguirk:
Tell that to Jimmy Akin, Augustine, and Aquinas, all believers and adamant defenders of predestination.

cin.org/users/james/files/loss.htm

Look at the Bible and how often predestination is mentioned:

biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=predestined&x=0&y=0

I don’t know if you understand the Catholic position on predestination yet, much less the Scriptural basis for it. Keep studying. 🙂

God bless,
c0ach
Doesn’t mean that any of the above are right about it…any more than you are Coach…
 
40.png
michaelp:
Maggie, just because people don’t agree with your points of discussion or counter them does not mean that they are “attacking” you. This is a place for discussion and debate. Don’t think that your statement won’t go unchallenged. If you believe I am being uncharitable in my arguments, please let me know, but don’t take a strong disagreement as an attack. I respect you and your opinions, but they are not the only ones out here on the web.

I will bow out once again.

😉
Michael
Michael is was an attack whether you want to admit it or not. I do know the Catechism of the Catholic Church and I do understand the teachings on Invincible Ignorance. In fact I have debated many Rad Trads on that particular point because they, like the Catholics who have not understand how invincible ignorance is applied, are in error when they actually deny this particular doctrine.

A proper reading of the Catechism of the Catholic Church will clear up your own error.

Telling someone that she or he is not infallible in the way that you wrote is a direct ad hominem attack. If you want to question what I have said then you should ask for clarification rather than being so rude in what you say.

You can clarify what the Church teaches about Invincible Ignorance by clicking on the link below in this thread. Fr Vince Sherpa has responded to a question that is related to the subjected, and his response supports my understanding of how this doctrine applies. It is only applied to those who have never been exposed to the Gospel message. It is not applied to other Christians.

Maggie

Maggie
 
Therefore I say to you: walk according to the Spirit and do not give way to the desires of the flesh! For the desires of the flesh war against the spirit, and the desires of the spirit are opposed to the flesh. Both are in conflict with each other, so that you cannot do everything you would like. But let the Spirit lead you: this has nothing to do with submitting to the law.
You well know what comes from the flesh: Immorality, impurity and shamelessness, idol worship and magic, hatred, jealousy and violence, anger, ambition, division, factions, and envy, drunkenness, orgies and the like. I again say to you what I have already said: those who do these things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
(Galatians 5:16-25.)
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
Challenge:

Some Christians hold to the so-called doctrine of “Once saved, always saved–eternal security.” Many of the Christians who believe that doctrine also tend to attack the Roman Catholic faith for what they think are traditions of men. Yet, Catholics **do **accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior, which is the only foundation to being saved once and for all according to that doctrine.

So…

If accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior is the only requirement, then what difference (in their eyes) does it make if we believe other teachings (the sacraments, Marian theology, Papal theology, etc.)?

Furthermore, since according to the “Once Saved, always saved” doctrine we cannot ever lose our salvation no matter what we do–then why would believers in OSAS care if people are Catholic? After all, if all it takes is accepting Jesus, and nothing at all can separate us from God once we have done that–then it really does not matter what we choose to follow–correct?
TPJ, you must not have read the fine print. The fine print says, “no Catholics allowed.”:rolleyes:
 
40.png
c0achmcguirk:
Yes, OSAS is held by many people errantly. But those of us in the reformed camp believe something quite different called Perseverance of the Saints, or Preservation of the Saints.

There are many Biblical passages which support it, it basically says that those who have been chosen by the Father for eternal life can never lose their salvation. Now there are some who have a false conversion and seem to be Christians but then fall away, but the Bible says those people were never saved in the first place.

No one can know whether or not they will be glorified in heaven.

After all, Scripture tells us of many people who would have thought they were going to heaven, only to “fall away”:

“They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.”
–1 John 2:19

Those who leave God, never belonged to Him. Some will even do great things for God, calling on his name:

"Not everyone who says to me,‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ "
–Matt 7:21-23

These false Christians are the ones Jesus spoke of when he talked about the farmer sowing seed on the rocky places in Matthew 13:

"Some fell on rocky places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. But when the sun came up, the plants were scorched, and they withered because they had no root. "
–Matthew 13:5-6

Later, Jesus explains what this means:

“The one who received the seed that fell on rocky places is the man who hears the word and at once receives it with joy. But since he has no root, he lasts only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, he quickly falls away.”
–Matthew 13:20-21

The truth is, one can be a false Christian who is deceived into thinking they will persevere unto salvation.

You cannot know without a doubt, infallibly, whether or not you will be glorified when you die. You can have sufficient assurance that if you continue on the path, you are saved. This is the historic Protestant position.

Jesus, however, promises to be faithful to those who are drawn to him by the Father. True believers will be raised up on the last day and will persevere until the end. (John 6:36-45, John 10:25-29).

God bless,
c0ach
So, basically your saying that we have no free will and that God is the puppet master.
 
40.png
jimmy:
So, basically your saying that we have no free will and that God is the puppet master.
Romans 9 deals with your complaint fully:

"Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad–in order that God’s purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls–she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” Just as it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.” What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses,

"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."

It does not, therefore, depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?” But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ " Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath-- prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory–even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? "
–Romans 9:11-24

Did Pharaoh have a choice, or did God force his hand?

Did Pontius Pilate and Herod have a choice in killing Jesus? How does one in your position answer Acts 4:27-28?

"Indeed Herod and Pontius Pilate met together with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in this city to conspire against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed. They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen. "
–Acts 4:27-28

Was God the author of the evils that Joseph’s brothers did to him?

"His brothers then came and threw themselves down before him. “We are your slaves,” they said. But Joseph said to them, "Don’t be afraid. Am I in the place of God? You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. "
–Genesis 50:19-20

Could Joseph’s brothers have thwarted God’s plan and not commit the evil of selling Joseph into slavery?

How about Isaiah 10, which tells us that God makes the Assyrians attack Israel:

"Woe to the Assyrian, the rod of my anger,
in whose hand is the club of my wrath!
I send him against a godless nation,
I dispatch him against a people who anger me,
to seize loot and snatch plunder,
and to trample them down like mud in the streets.
But this is not what he intends,
this is not what he has in mind;
his purpose is to destroy,
to put an end to many nations
. "
–Isaiah 10:5-7

Do the Assyrians in Isaiah 10 have a choice? God tells us that he is behind their efforts to “seize loot and snatch plunder, and to trample them down like mud in the streets.”

Later in Isaiah 10, God reminds us of man’s place in His plans:

"Does the ax raise itself above him who swings it,
or the saw boast against him who uses it?
As if a rod were to wield him who lifts it up,
or a club brandish him who is not wood! "
–Isaiah 10:15

Someone in your position would have us believe that man (the ax) swings God (him who swings it). This is foolishness in light of Scripture.

How does one who believes in libertarian free will account for the passages above? God is clearly teaching us that he “forces” us to do evil to accomplish His work in Romans 9, Genesis 50, Acts 4, and Isaiah 10. If God doesn’t do this, as you claim, then what are these passages saying? How would God’s plans be accomplished if he was at the mercy of our choices?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top