T
teachccd
Guest
To blind eyes nothing can be shown…And yet, no one has shown how it is our love that saves. FUnny, huh?
To blind eyes nothing can be shown…And yet, no one has shown how it is our love that saves. FUnny, huh?
Ephesians 2:8
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God
God’s grace, Our faith.
Grace alone, Faith alone.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.
Obvious enough, you think??Okay, to address the title of this thread, I would offer this:
Isn’t it curious that the Apostle Paul used the word “faith” and related terms more than 200 times in the New Testament, yet he never once used the phrase “faith alone”?
This seems strange considering how concerned Paul was with passing on the faith accurately and the means to justification would be among the most important truths he would preach. In fact, throughout all of his works, he goes to great lengths to choose his words with precision, so it seems odd that “faith alone” does not appear once in all of his writings.
This is even more surprising given the fact that Paul also used the words “alone” and “only” more than any other New Testament author. Clearly, Paul was well-accustomed to using these powerful qualifiers.
Could it be that the Holy Spirit prevented Paul from ever writing “faith alone” to describe the process of justification? And that same check prevented any of the gospel writers from ascribing “faith alone” to Jesus, either.
In fact, the only time that the Holy Spirit allowed any author to use that infamous phrase, is when He inspired James to write, “You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.” (James 2:24)
Therefore, for those who propose that Paul taught justification by faith alone, a very haunting question remains: Why didn’t Paul use the specific phrase “faith alone” anywhere in his New Testament writings?
In the first sentence you appear to agree, then you go on to explain why “faith alone” doesn’t mean “faith alone”.Ignatius;2219392:
Good question!If you have “faith and faith alone”, even if you have “all faith so as to move mountains and have not love” it is nothing. "Faith alone " can’t save you.
If you don’t mean “faith alone” then why use that expression? If you are going to use the expression “faith alone” and not mean it, then it is misleading. If the term “faith alone” doesn’t mean “faith alone” then why don’t you guys drop the expression and use one that is more accurate?
“faith alone” is only part of it, but this part means “only faith” not “faith without love”.
For faith without love is not just dead faith, it is not faith.
“Faith alone” means that it is not the love that saves, it is the faith. If the love saved, it would be a work - we would be getting into heaven by doing stuff, by our own actions.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.
It’s one or the other. In the Protestant tradition the solas mean so little across the whole tradition because Protestantism by its very nature is not united, but divided. Anglicans will tell you one thing about the solas while Calvinists will tell you something totally different.Again - that is God’s love, not our love.
Grace Alone and Faith Alone.
God’s grace, His love and our faith.