D
Divine3
Guest
God bless Austria…
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a7.htmIt is not stealing. See my post (Post #86) above.
Under normal circumstances, yes. Under the present circumstances, where the prelates and authorities you want to raise your objection to, are the ones disregarding the first commandment and canon law, then good luck. What the Austrians did was appropriate. By throwing the idols into the Tiber, they gave a message that both the Pope and the whole world heard.
Heads up:[2401] The seventh commandment forbids unjustly taking or keeping the goods of one’s neighbor and wronging him in any way with respect to his goods. It commands justice and charity in the care of earthly goods and the fruits of men’s labor. For the sake of the common good, it requires respect for the universal destination of goods and respect for the right to private property. Christian life strives to order this world’s goods to God and to fraternal charity.
I happen to agree with many people that the statuary was inappropriate for display in a Catholic Church or for use in a Catholic prayer ceremony.[1756] It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human acts by considering only the intention that inspires them or the circumstances (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context. There are acts which, in and of themselves, independently of circumstances and intentions, are always gravely illicit by reason of their object; such as blasphemy and perjury, murder and adultery. One may not do evil so that good may result from it.
Catechism of the Catholic ChurchUnder normal circumstances, yes. Under the present circumstances, where the prelates and authorities you want to raise your objection to, are the ones disregarding the first commandment and canon law, then good luck. What the Austrians did was appropriate. By throwing the idols into the Tiber, they gave a message that both the Pope and the whole world heard.
No this not what his specific words were. get the exact quotePope Francis specifically said it was done not with an idolatrous intent. So therefore no pagan worship
And who debates this?Idolatry
2112 The first commandment condemns polytheism . It requires man neither to believe in, nor to venerate, other divinities than the one true God. Scripture constantly recalls this rejection of “idols, [of] silver and gold, the work of men’s hands. They have mouths, but do not speak; eyes, but do not see.” These empty idols make their worshippers empty: "Those who make them are like them; so are all who trust in them."42 God, however, is the "living God"43 who gives life and intervenes in history.
2113 Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon."44 Many martyrs died for not adoring "the Beast"45 refusing even to simulate such worship. Idolatry rejects the unique Lordship of God; it is therefore incompatible with communion with God.46
2114 Human life finds its unity in the adoration of the one God. The commandment to worship the Lord alone integrates man and saves him from an endless disintegration. Idolatry is a perversion of man’s innate religious sense. An idolater is someone who "transfers his indestructible notion of God to anything other than God."47
the guy could have done something really productive, but instead he got caught up with his passions.[1756] It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human acts by considering only the intention that inspires them or the circumstances (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context. There are acts which, in and of themselves, independently of circumstances and intentions, are always gravely illicit by reason of their object; such as blasphemy and perjury, murder and adultery. One may not do evil so that good may result from it.
I am a zealot for the 10 commandments and for accuracy.I have a very uneasy feeling about the increasing lack of prudence in these zealots. Where next. I hope they don’t inspire one of these dangerous fools to kill our beloved Pope.
I have only found it ‘scandalising’ a certain type. 2 of my kids are very involved in the diocesan youth ministry and report that no one is talking about it. We are faithful to Pope Francis to the end and trust him in leading us in these times of “the last things” by challenging us to grow in discernment.Emeraldlady:![]()
I am a zealot for the 10 commandments and for accuracy.I have a very uneasy feeling about the increasing lack of prudence in these zealots. Where next. I hope they don’t inspire one of these dangerous fools to kill our beloved Pope.
It was an incredibly unwise and unresearched thing to do. It has scandalised so many as much as the sex abuse scandal has. get out there and talk to catholics in real life, the sentiments expressed on caf are being expresses in parishes by the laity as well, both OF and EF
he is not speaking for everyone. just himselfope Francis said:
"Good afternoon, I would like to say a word about the pachamama statues that were removed from the Church at Traspontina, which were there without idolatrous intentions and were thrown into the Tiber.
Feels like Deja vuAnd this does not discharge the clegy from the scandal ongoing over this
The word native is as offensive as the N word.Feels like Deja vu
Can you get quotes from those Natives and clergy (at the time in question), verifying that they rendered adoration to idols that would verify that they are idolaters??
So when the pope calls the statue Pachamama that’s his name for it, just for himself.he is not speaking for everyone. just himself
we cannot conflate this statement
Are you sure about that? LolThe word native is as offensive as the N word.
when my pope calls it by its name, the name known by those who know of it, and then saysSo when the pope calls the statue Pachamama that’s his name for it, just for himself.
Or are you to believe what you want to hear and dismiss what you don’t like?