M
MaryT777
Guest
You too.So I took a couple minute break from my lovely July 4th holiday to come by CAF. I see I didn’t miss anything new on this thread.
Have a great holiday weekend everyone![]()
The trial is still going on though,
You too.So I took a couple minute break from my lovely July 4th holiday to come by CAF. I see I didn’t miss anything new on this thread.
Have a great holiday weekend everyone![]()
It’s Martin that got the shaft in this case. Zimmerman found him guilty and a suspect and he was innocent. Serino said there was NO evidence he was committing any crime.NO CLUE?
I guess George is scre*** Guilty until proven innocent.
What is the proper number of blows to the head should one take before one acts in self-defense? My aunt was killed with one from a fall.It’s Martin that got the shaft in this case. Zimmerman found him guilty and a suspect and he was innocent. Serino said there was NO evidence he was committing any crime.
Being killed by a neighbor on neighborhood watch that was following you around and named you as a “suspect” is a lot different than being “killed” with one from a fall.What is the proper number of blows to the head should one take before one acts in self-defense? My aunt was killed with one from a fall.
No one has called anyone on this thread a defender of Murderers. Most say we don’t know what happened because one party of the incident, Martin is dead.
So what are you saying?It’s Martin that got the shaft in this case. Zimmerman found him guilty and a suspect and he was innocent. Serino said there was NO evidence he was committing any crime.
Well, my mom was beaten to a pulp, strangled, and left for dead. But she lived.What is the proper number of blows to the head should one take before one acts in self-defense? My aunt was killed with one from a fall.
I’m glad to hear that. She wasn’t shot though.Well, my mom was beaten to a pulp, strangled, and left for dead. But she lived.
/, but it’s the truth.
There was no evidence according to the police he was committing a crime. He should be able to walk in his neighborhood peacefully without being followed and reported to theSo what are you saying?
My point is how many blows does it take to put someone in peril?I’m glad to hear that. She wasn’t shot though.
Yeah, anyone can call police and report that they think someone is suspicious. I don’t understand what you’re saying there.There was no evidence according to the police he was committing a crime. He should be able to walk in his neighborhood peacefully without being followed and reported to the
police as a suspect. Then shot dead.
How many gun shots does it take before one is dead and can’t recover.My point is how many blows does it take to put someone in peril?
They won’t be able to do that because one witness is dead. Therefore ZimmermanYeah, anyone can call police and report that they think someone is suspicious. I don’t understand what you’re saying there.
Plus it’s not illegal to follow someone in a public area. Rude, maybe? Illegal, no.
There are plenty of scenarios where TM could credibly be the physical aggressor, which would make his actions criminal. He’s not on trial though. Z is, and the state must prove Z was the aggressor for a murder charge.
Depends. In my aforementioned post, my father was killed by a single shot to the head. I’ve known people shot in the head who survived.How many gun shots does it take before one is dead and can’t recover.
Ever hear of forensics?They won’t be able to do that because one witness is dead. Therefore Zimmerman
will probably be acquitted.
I agree TM is not on trial; he’s dead.
Yes.Ever hear of forensics?
I agree with you, the state has not been able to prove its case against GZ. Acquittal would be the correct result.They won’t be able to do that because one witness is dead. Therefore Zimmerman
will probably be acquitted.
I agree TM is not on trial; he’s dead.
I watched a little of the trial over my lunch hour - it was on in the break room. It would appear the medical examiner think forensics is some sort of acting class. He was completely clueless. Apparently it is his opinion that Martin was acting under the influence of drugs that night - something he forgot to tell the prosecutor and the defense.Ever hear of forensics?
The trial is not over yet.I agree with you, the state has not been able to prove its case against GZ. Acquittal would be the correct result.
Yeah, anyone can call police and report that they think someone is suspicious. I don’t understand what you’re saying there.
Plus it’s not illegal to follow someone in a public area. Rude, maybe? Illegal, no.
There are plenty of scenarios where TM could credibly be the physical aggressor, which would make his actions criminal. He’s not on trial though. Z is, and the state must prove Z was the aggressor for a murder charge.
"qui est ce:They won’t be able to do that because one witness is dead. Therefore Zimmerman
will probably be acquitted.
I agree TM is not on trial; he’s dead.
Ever hear of forensics?
If your point is TM is dead, we agree. It’s very sad.Yes.
Never heard that. I did hear TM had bruised knuckles. What did the ME deduct from that?I watched a little of the trial over my lunch hour - it was on in the break room. It would appear the medical examiner think forensics is some sort of acting class. He was completely clueless. Apparently it is his opinion that Martin was acting under the influence of drugs that night - something he forgot to tell the prosecutor and the defense.