R
RhodesianSon
Guest
It is in bigger cities, but rural areas have the higher rates of gun ownership for other reasons.
There are veterans that die every year from disease and accidents. People who were professional soldier or police still die in ways other than being shot. People are killed by gunfire who would never own a gun. So either Jesus was a liar, or this does not mean what it seems to mean. We may never know, but it is possible he was echoing some truism or saying that was known in his time and place for those that took up arms against the Romans.Did not Jesus say: “all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword(Matthew 26,52)”?
Americans are an odd lot when it comes to firearms. I own one, as required by my job, but I do not like or trust in firearms. I am closer to the OP than I am to the gun owners here. I understand pacifism, though I cannot be a pacifist. I am pleased the Catholic Church promotes the acceptance and tolerance of pacifism.This is where we differ, I dont live in your country and I have God as a great gift and thank Him daily for my faith.
A weapon is an enemy, even unto it’s owner.Are all weapons Satan’s inventions?
What do you think about (real/airsoft) weapons? I personally get creeps when I see who all used weapons and who died under that invention. Is it good for a Catholic to own a weapon, even if it is airsoft?
It’s really not. It’s a mixture of two things, in my opinion. First is just reasonable prudence. Violent crime isn’t super common, but it’s not unheard of. House fires aren’t common either, but I still have a fire extinguisher in my house.I had no idea that violent crime in the US is so commonplace that people feel driven to own gun(s).
There are some big predators in the States!I haven’t needed it for anything other than predators, which thing I’m grateful for.
Although I dont equate not having a weapon with pacifism. There is a lot I could say here but its best for a new topic.I am pleased the Catholic Church promotes the acceptance and tolerance of pacifism.
You can beg. I won’t. Even if I’m unarmed I’ll go out fighting.In most cases, you beg for your life.
What would be the purpose of such a rule in these orders?I know if you’re a lay person who belongs to certain third orders, you’re not allowed to own a gun.
Sounds like Canada to me… ;/Frankly, to my American ears, that sounds like an immoral law. If I have a gun I legally own for hunting, and an axe wielding maniac breaks into my house to murder my family, you’re really going to tell me I can’t use my gun to protect myself? I’m just supposed to let myself get murdered?
Sounds crazy to me.