B
boastinjesus
Guest
I have added numbers beside a few of your points to make my response easier to follow, I hope. Forgive me if that’s against protocol…I’m not arguing against a “circumcision of the heart.” I am saying the circumcision made without hands-the circumcision of Christ occurs during Baptism, as does the forgiveness of sins.
- I think the issue boils down to when that “inward change,” including the forgiveness of sins, actually occurs—during a “Sinner’s Prayer” or during Baptism.
Infants were brought into the Old Covenant. The New Covenant is more inclusive. The N.T. never says—now I know your infants were included under the Old Covenant; but now God has decided to exclude them. Prove to me that infants are excluded.
- I never said one is saved without a change of heart. Scripture just doesn’t indicate that all the “inward” part must take place before baptism. Is the “inward” part complete without the forgiveness of sins???
- Are babies condemned because they are not yet able to believe (at least as far as we know)?
Gotta run–getting ready for house guests.
Peace to you,
Anna
- I don’t think a “sinners prayer” saves anyone either. I would argue that those who are saved are saved “before the foundation of the world” (Eph. 1), and that is effected at the moment when God changes their heart. Then we are called to respond in obedience, ie repentance, baptism, seeking to live a holy life.
- Is someone forgiven with baptism apart from repentance / belief?
- Was everyone circumcized in the Old Covenant saved? I would argue, that no it was a national covenant. I would also argue that per Jer. and other verses listed previously that everyone in the New Covenant is saved. That’s why we would only give the covenant sign to those whom have shown evidence of the inward change.
I gotta take my son to a soccer game. I hope you enjoyed your house guests.