E
Et_Cetera
Guest
How can people be held accountable for an act that they did not commit? It seems to imply that humans are inherently bad and weak.
Think of Original Sin as a disease- if two parents are carriers, the children will have it too.How can people be held accountable for an act that they did not commit? It seems to imply that humans are inherently bad and weak.
Imagine that when they were young your parents ignored a warning sign and went into a radioactive building. The radioactivity damaged their genes and resulted in a mutation that was passed down to their children. They owner of the building accepted their apologies for breaking into the building and didn’t prosecute them. The owner even made available to them and their descendants a medication could help them overcome the weakness of the mutated gene when they took it regularly.How can people be held accountable for an act that they did not commit? It seems to imply that humans are inherently bad and weak.
No…So it is really believed that if a child dies without first having been baptised, it will be condemned to suffering?
It hasn’t been revealed to us what happens to unbaptized children. God is both just and merciful. We don’t assume that the child is condemned to suffering; we leave his fate to divine mercy.So it is really believed that if a child dies without first having been baptised, it will be condemned to suffering?
The traditional understanding is while the child does not have the grace to enter heaven, the child does not have the sins to be punished in hell. It goes instead to a place of perfect natural happiness- a happiness better than anything on this earthSo it is really believed that if a child dies without first having been baptised, it will be condemned to suffering?
God is not bound by His sacraments. He can give the children the graces necessary for salvation. Infact, Baptism is in three forms: Water, desire, and blood. Baptism by water is the usual form, Baptism by desire is when someone would want a Baptism if they knew about it (in other words, they would choose to be baptized if they had knowledge of Christ), and Baptism by blood is when someone dies for Christ. A child can very well have a Baptism of desire. Moreover, God excludes no one from His Mercy - He desires all to be saved.So it is really believed that if a child dies without first having been baptised, it will be condemned to suffering?
It is not just Adam who sinned, but we too. We have all sinned. In the sin of Adam we participate by committing sins ourselves.How can people be held accountable for an act that they did not commit? It seems to imply that humans are inherently bad and weak.
If that is true then an omnipotent God would ensure that all *would be saved, no?Moreover, God excludes no one from His Mercy - He desires all to be saved.
**BRILLIANT!As psychology, I think it makes perfect sense.
Every human being seems to have this nagging feeling that the world around us-- life itself, including us-- isn’t what it should or could be. As though the world is broken.
Why do babies cry when they are fed, clean, and warm? Why do teens always say ‘That’s not FAIR!’? Because on some level they recognize that the world as it is isn’t the world they were made for.
The Fall of Man is the only story I’ve heard that adequetly explains or even recognizes this instinctive disconnect between our expectations and the world we find ourselves living in.
Can man not choose love or refuse it? Is God not love? (rhetorical questions)If that is true then an omnipotent God would ensure that all *would be saved, no?
If God wants all to be saved, then if not all are saved, God doesn’t get what He wants. If God is omnipotent He should get what He wants. So maybe God doesn’t want all to be saved after all. Or maybe God isn’t omnipotent.Can man not choose love or refuse it? Is God not love? And do we not rebel against God - refuse to love Him back - by committing sins? (rhetorical questions)
What more can God do? He has first off, become incarnate, then continues to dwell with us in the Eucharist.If that is true then an omnipotent God would ensure that all *would be saved, no?
Maybe you don’t know what “omnipotent” means? You act as if everything is God’s fault, as if you have no fault of your own. Do you presume that man is as white as snow?If God wants all to be saved, then if not all are saved, God doesn’t get what He wants. If God is omnipotent He should get what He wants. So maybe God doesn’t want all to be saved after all. Or maybe God isn’t omnipotent.
So you thereby limit the power of God?Omnipotent means that God has the power to do all the good He wants, how He wants, when He wants. where He wants. and why He wants. It dosen’t mean He has the power to destroy the grace of free-will. (Yes, free-will is a grace)
So God doesn’t get what He wants? How is that omnipotent? He wants something that He can’t have?God certainly wants all saved, and He has said this in His Word. Open the Bible and read.
Do you really think my words have an effect on God, or are you just grasping for straws now?So you thereby limit the power of God?
So God doesn’t get what He wants? How is that omnipotent? He wants something that He can’t have?
You said “It dosen’t mean He has the power to destroy the grace of free-will.”Do you really think my words have an effect on God, or are you just grasping for straws now?
God is love. Meditate on that.