S
stinkcat_14
Guest
I think the problem is that nobody wants to give a clear definition of socialism. Is Canada socialist because they have government run healthcare?
I don’t think that that is what socialism is at all. I think socialism is an ideology that seeks to achieve state/public ownership and administration of the means of production (and services) and distribution of the proceeds of this. I don’t think that taxation of the public and of businesses and using this revenue to provide public services is actually socialism.In my book socialism just means government provided healthcare and state benefits
When ever they don’t like something they call it socialism. What they really reject is the common good, and they liken it to socialism to fool people into thinking it’s wrong.I don’t think that that is what socialism is at all. I think socialism is an ideology that seeks to achieve state/public ownership and administration of the means of production (and services) and distribution of the proceeds of this. I don’t think that taxation of the public and of businesses and using this revenue to provide public services is actually socialism.
I think there is often confusion between social democracy, socialism and simply a government (even a conservative one) providing public services for the public. In the UK, the Conservative government provides healthcare and state benefits funded by taxation. Are they socialists?
Name calling and labelling cuts both ways. But I do think the term ‘socialism’ is often used not so much as name calling, but as a relative term or comparison. If using taxation to provide public services is socialism then I would think practically all Western nations (even the USA) would be classified as being socialist. But they’re not socialist governments, so what really is a socialist government?When ever they don’t like something they call it socialism.