F
figs
Guest
This is the point I was trying to stress the other day.Brother, I have to disagree with you. The canon says resonable expectation that the child will be raised Catholic. Since the daughter is apparently being baptised and will be raise in the faith, there can be an expectation that the son would be as well. Both children are hers.
I will point out that any part of the canon can have a dispensation based on pastoral reasons. We need to look beyond the law and look at what message this action is sending to the boy, and how that could effect his future believe and faith. will he have questions that the Church accepted his his sister amd he was not good enough? Is he being marked with the sins of the mother? We have clergy cannot always just take the law and say that’s final. If we do we are not being pastoral, just rule follows and we see how well that has worked out in the past.
And if it is the priest’s “call” why on eather would he make such and awkward call?
Now there is nothing but confusion and hurt, and I am really referring to the little boy but this manouver has managed to put a bad taste in everyone’s mouth.
Instead of looking like the “Welcoming church” that we try portray in adverts trying to get people to the faith, we’ve achieved the opposite in this case.
Having been personally involved in one of those, one pesron gets baptised and the other doesn’t, I can assure you the child DOES certainly remember the hurt and what their mind has interpreted as rejection.
It would have been far better to decline baptising BOTH children until a pile of things were sorted first.
But, hey, this is my opinion, I just see it all as a real shame.