T
TaylorDonBarret
Guest
Where exactly do you think I have misrepresented them?Not even Paul or Augustine would agree with your theology. They’d say you were misrepresenting them.
Where exactly do you think I have misrepresented them?Not even Paul or Augustine would agree with your theology. They’d say you were misrepresenting them.
I am happy to leave it a mystery. My goal is only to discourage the “synergistic” understanding that so many Catholics adopt - an understanding that denies the mystery, elevates man, and destroys humility.
That synergy elevates man and destroys humility.Where exactly do you think I have misrepresented them?
This is true or grace wouldn’t be grace. But again, God initiates the process of justification by his grace, but the sinner is not justified without his free cooperation with that grace. CCC#1993 “Justification establishes cooperation between God’s grace and man’s freedom.”
**God bless Richca and every readers of the CAF.
The point is-and will always be- that man can reject grace. Otherwise God would be supremely unfair, basing election to heaven and reprobation to eternal punishment on divine whim before the creation of the world, rather than on any willful response to and cooperation with His overtures. We can’t be saved without Him, but He doesn’t save us without us. Because our willingness is directly related to and increases our justice, and increased justice means increased holiness, worth, and happiness. This is what He’s always wanted for us, but would never force upon us-or else we couldn’t make the right choice for ourselves. And so from Adam on it’s always been about making the right choice, with the help of grace.God bless Fahansen and every readers of the CAF.
CCC 1993 Justification establishes cooperation between God’s grace and man’s freedom. On man’s part it is expressed by the assent of faith to the Word of God, which invites him to conversion, and in the cooperation of charity with the prompting of the Holy Spirit who precedes and preserves his assent:
When God touches man’s heart through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, man himself is not inactive while receiving that inspiration, since he could reject it; and yet, without God’s grace, he cannot by his own free will move himself toward justice in God’s sight.
CCC 2022; “The divine initiative in the work of grace PRECEDES, PREPARES, and ELICITS the free response of man. …”
The only problem, of course, is that the Catholic Church doesn’t teach this. There is no necessary distinction between actual and sanctifying grace in terms of efficacy, and, again, grace is always resistible anyway.When we speaking about God’s graces to avoid confusion, we should always make it clear:
We are speaking about ** intrinsic and infallible efficacious graces,** like God’s grace of Initial justification or God’s special grace The Gift of Final Perseverance.
Or we speaking about graces which are not intrinsic and infallible efficacious graces, like God’s actual grace given to us to do good works like charity, etc.
**God bless Fhansen and every readers of the CAF.The point is-and will always be- that man can reject grace. Otherwise God would be supremely unfair, basing election to heaven and reprobation to eternal punishment on divine whim before the creation of the world, rather than on any willful response to and cooperation with His overtures. We can’t be saved without Him, but He doesn’t save us without us. Because our willingness is directly related to and increases our justice, and increased justice means increased holiness, worth, and happiness. This is what He’s always wanted for us, but would never force upon us-or else we couldn’t make the right choice for ourselves. And so from Adam on it’s always been about making the right choice, with the help of grace.
The only problem, of course, is that the Catholic Church doesn’t teach this. There is no necessary distinction between actual and sanctifying grace in terms of efficacy, and, again, grace is always resistible anyway.
I’m hesitant on the word never. Excepting examples such as the BVM, your phrasing that the elect IJ+GoFP) can “never reject salvation-related graces” means that they can never sin venially or mortally. Certainly there are those among the elect who were justified, lost that justification, were absolved and regained their justification, and have been saved. Would you agree?As you see above Fhansen, St. Thomas Aquinas and the Trent infallible teaches; an Initially Justified, RECEIVED God’s grace The Gift of Final Perseverance, never reject salvation-related graces, God’s grace The Gift of Final Perseverance takes care about it, and makes sure the recipients end up in heaven.
Protestants who say, … Catholics believe we must do good works in order to become justified — a position which was explicitly condemned at Trent, which taught “nothing that precedes justification, whether faith or works, merits the grace of justification” (Decree on Justification 8).**God bless Fhansen and every readers of the CAF.
You said Fhansen:**
The point is-and will always be- that man can reject grace.
I perfectly agree with you Fhansen, we can reject grace.
The truth is:
Every man has free will and CAN and sometimes reject works-related graces. – 1 Cor.3:12-15.
Every man has free will and CAN but never reject salvation-related graces; God grace The Gift of Final Perseverance helps man that freely make the right choices. – INFALLIBLE TEACHING.
RESISTING AND COOPERATING WITH GOD by James Akin.
Quote:
**God bless Fhansen and every readers of the CAF.Sorry, the RCC teaches specifically that efficacious grace, of any kind, can be rejected. And so did St Augustine:
**“He who made you without your consent does not justify you without your consent.” ** Sermo 169, 13
Study and pray more, try to get on board with basic Christianity
God bless Wesrock and every readers of the CAF.I’m hesitant on the word never. Excepting examples such as the BVM, your phrasing that the elect [IJ+GoFP) can “never reject salvation-related graces” means that they can never sin venially or mortally. Certainly there are those among the elect who were justified, lost that justification, were absolved and regained their justification, and have been saved. Would you agree?
The key point, which we’re all circling around, is that men are actively involved in willing their initial justification and further justification. They cannot be involved without the action of God, but that does not negate their involvement or make their involvement passive.
You’re funny LRContinuation
**You said Fhansen:
Sorry, the RCC teaches specifically that efficacious grace, of any kind, can be rejected.
**
I’m sorry I don’t want you contradict you above statement, but the Catholic Church teachings Predestination of the elect which is a DE FIDE Dogma and the Catholic teaching on God’s grace The Gift of Final Perseverance which is and INFALLIBLE teachings of the Trent totally contradicts your above statement.