Outrage over sexual freedom movements

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainPrudeman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You missed the whole point.
I have nothing but respect for brave and virtuous women, I was just stating the horrible outcome of sexual liberation.
I won’t answer your personal offenses, but I ask you to refrain from calling people you don’t know “idiots”.
 
Elizabeth3 said:
40.png
anna:
And where were the men and do you have a similiar name for them and yourself.
Click to expand...
Anna, you’re right on this point. Historically, if there was going to be a harsh term for women who slept with men outside marriage for money then there should have been a word that is just as harsh for men as well. Christianity teaches that it’s a mortal sin for both men and women. Whore does seem to make a value judgement on particular women at the level of their worth as a human being that words like cad or womanizer does not.

However, you are veering off-topic by bringing in women’s education and careers which no one here is saying should be off limits to women.
Click to expand...
I thought the term manwhore was a thing which had the same connotations.

Personally, I find it sad that the term womanizer doesn’t carry the same connotations as the term whore. For some reason society gives men a greater pass for this sort of atrocious behavior. If anything, men should get it way worse seeing as how we’re supposed to protect the women in our lives to the best of our ability…
 
Isn’t the term for men “libertine”? At least, that’s what I call them. I have no respect for them either, even less so.
 
I thought libertine…ism… applied to pretty much all the hedonistic pursuits, not just sex. I may be wrong on that though. It’s a good term for them.
 
Let’s be honest here, if you’re a hedonist you’re more likely than not to be sexually immoral. I think the term fits, but doesn’t pack the punch that “whore” or the others used to describe women do.
 
ProdglArchitect said:
I thought the term manwhore was a thing which had the same connotations.
Click to expand...
Yes. That does seem to be a thing that is catching on in modern terminology but historically there was no such word. I wonder why there is the need to make up new names? Fornicators works me. It names the sin and implies an ability to still be redeemed or to live up to their dignity in a way that whore or man-whore seems to imply something irredeemable about the person.
 
I’d only use that kind of term to refer to someone who’s judging others for not engaging in fornication. I reserve special anger for the people who advance the purposes of sexual liberation and contraception.
 
I’m a woman and I agree with him. Before sexual liberation, men would treat women with respect because it was the gentlemanly thing to do. Now they expect something in return, like sex after the first date. And women give in to men expecting them to whore themselves out for a paid dinner when they are truly worth so much more.

This is why we object to sexual liberation. It turns everyone into whores instead of people with God-given dignity.
 
Have you read my last posts on this thread? I clearly said that men that sleep around are just as wrong.
 
How is it misogyny to say that women are worth far more than they make themselves? That’s practically the opposite.
 
Don’t turn this thread into a playground screaming match, please. I want to see how many Catholics on here feel like me in terms of the sexual revolution.
 
Calm down. Nobody here is saying that working women are evil or that women’s education is evil. All that’s being said is that the presence of contraception and the sexual revolutions deprived women of their intrinsic dignity.
 
anna said:
that right… Do you have a mother ?
Click to expand...
No.

My wife and my mother are both figments of my imagination.

A misogynist such as myself who cannot appreciate such gems as “Fifty Shades of Grey” clearly has no experience with women.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top