Outspoken opponent of the gay agenda wins presidential election in Poland

[TC3033]

You should check into the peer review process and the issues with it. There have been many articles about its failings.

Oh, I have. It’s still better than any Tom, Dick or Harry publishing their own study…without having any 2nd source validation of their numbers and work.

Nevertheless, you could produce a peer reviewed paper showing how homosexual sex can fulfill the design and purpose of the reproductive organs.

I don’t think I need a study to know how someone fulfills the design, and we all know that it’s impossible to fulfill the purpose (from a Chriatian POV). I’m not sure what that even has to do with anything though…

 

[Freddy]

Risky behavior is now to be shouldered by the rest of society rather than personally.

Quite right. Sleeping around with multiple partners and having unprotected sex should be discouraged. Whatever sex you are and whatever the sex of tbe person you are having sex with.

Hence the mention of false equivalency.

 

[Freddy]

And which behaviour is more likely to have to be shouldered by society: A gay woman in a lifetime relationship with her partner or a heterosexual man who has unprotected sex with a different partner every week?

 

[WingedHussar]

Statistically improbable unless that guy is Mick Jagger or someone like that.

 

[Freddy]

Statistically improbable unless that guy is Mick Jagger or someone like that.

Agreed. So an argument that a ‘gay lifestyle’ is sexually dangerous is no more valid than saying any lifestyle that is involved with promiscuity is dangerous. In which it’s rejected as an argument against homosexuality itself.