Outspoken Pastor Ousted from LCMS

  • Thread starter Thread starter qui_est_ce
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
chroniclesmagazine.org/the-lcms-calls-a-post-a-post/

While the tone is a bit harsh in places, this speaks to the issue. Dr Becker’s heterodoxy is more than just female ordination.

Jon
The purpose of any sort of church discipline is partly to protect those who are affected by his ministry, but also it can be a wake up call to benefit the person. Maybe not now, but sometimes the Spirit works on us gradually. This can happen in the long run, but only if he is treated with love by those who disagree with his views. But it took love to discipline him in the first place. It would have been much easier for LCMS to get applause from the secular media for pretending to be open minded, and “diverse”. (“Let’s send this to committee for further review…Let’s not act too hastily…We need to take a **pastoral ** approach on this…”)
 
Indeed. The more we try to retain our orthodoxy, the more we come to resemble our roots. Stop smirking now, my RC brothers and sisters :o Whatever would you do with a few million potential little Luthers fidgeting in your pews?
Eventually the goats and sheep will find their respective pens. The more liberal the churches are, the more some will find comfort in strong foundations. Those that can’t stand the winds of change (sound like a Scorpion song) better seek strong shelter with a Rock for its foundation.
 
chroniclesmagazine.org/the-lcms-calls-a-post-a-post/

While the tone is a bit harsh in places, this speaks to the issue. Dr Becker’s heterodoxy is more than just female ordination.

Jon
I found the following quotes trom the article particularly interesting.
Christianity then becomes subject to the whims of the day, and the Church must consistently** stick Her finger in the wind to determine whether Her teachings are acceptable in the light of popular morality and popular science. **
Bolding mine.
At the same time, Becker, following the trajectory of moral relativism, insists that these transgressions are not really sins at all, because the “Gospel” frees us all to “set aside apostolic commands if they have become outdated and are no longer applicable in one’s cultural setting.”
:eek: I wonder where he finds support for this?

It appears to me that many mainstream denominations are following this route. The Episcopal Church in America, United Church of Christ, etc.

Loving has changed from loving the person, hating the sin, to “tolerance,” which really means agreeing that the sin is no more.
 
I’m wondering. Does tolerance equate to agree/except?
In the Christian realm, I would say yes. For example, the truth of God’s message can’t abide with heresy, and as such we must protect against it in order to shepherd the flock.
 
I found the following quotes trom the article particularly interesting.
Christianity then becomes subject to the whims of the day, and the Church must consistently stick Her finger in the wind to determine whether Her teachings are acceptable in the light of popular morality and popular science
What kind of “popular science” are they talking about? Is it the “popular science” used by archaeologists to prove, for example, that the Book of Joshua was not written before the monarchy but rather is a pious fiction probably put together by the so called Deuteronomistic historian or historians sometime in the 7th century BC? As noted by the archaeologists Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman in their book, The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001), pp. 81-82:
In the case of Jericho, there was no trace of a settlement of any kind in the thirteenth century BCE, and the earlier Late Bronze settlement, dating to the fourteenth century BCE, was small and poor, almost insignificant, and unfortified. There was also no sign of a destruction. Thus the famous scene of the Israelite forces marching around the walled town with the Ark of the Covenant, causing Jericho’s mighty walls to collapse by the blowing of their war trumpets was, to put it simply, a romantic mirage.
 
I’ve never been able to comprehend the notion that a punishment such as this is done out of love.
Perhaps you have children: I’ve found that telling my children to stop complaining is initially stressful, but saves hours of suffering - especially when the other children start to emulate the first.
 
Having read the article by Aaron Wolf, I found this kind of interesting:
Becker refused to appeal [his expulsion], and is now heading for his true home among the tattooed priestesses on the clergy roster of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (sic) in America.
His condescending reference to the “tattooed priestesses” of the ELCA is to ELCA pastor Nadia Bolz-Weber, founder of House for All Sinners and Saints in Denver, CO. I think she’s a fantastic pastor and I’ve been very inspired by her recent book Patrix: The Cranky, Beautiful Faith of a Sinner and Saint (New York: Jericho Books, 2013). I also find it a little amusing that Wolf has put the word “sic” in parentheses after the word “Church” in the ELCA’s name, implying that it’s not a real church.
 
Having read the article by Aaron Wolf, I found this kind of interesting:

His condescending reference to the “tattooed priestesses” of the ELCA is to ELCA pastor Nadia Bolz-Weber, founder of House for All Sinners and Saints in Denver, CO. I think she’s a fantastic pastor and I’ve been very inspired by her recent book Patrix: The Cranky, Beautiful Faith of a Sinner and Saint (New York: Jericho Books, 2013). I also find it a little amusing that Wolf has put the word “sic” in parentheses after the word “Church” in the ELCA’s name, implying that it’s not a real church.
I think the “sic” was intended to call into question whether or not the ELCA is an Evangelical Lutheran Church. Few doubt it is a church.

Jon
 
Indeed. The more we try to retain our orthodoxy, the more we come to resemble our roots. Stop smirking now, my RC brothers and sisters :o Whatever would you do with a few million potential little Luthers fidgeting in your pews?
Oh, like we don’t already have them? Like the Women’s Ordination Conference?

But, you see, it’s good that your president has excommunicated this Barker fellow. You know why? Well, if Barker is in error, do y’all want him to stay in error? Of course not. You want him to come back to sanity. You don’t want him to join the ELCA; you want him to stay in the bosom of the true faith. Right?

*Now what do you think the Bishop of Rome and all the other bishops in communion with him were doing when they excommunicated and persecuted Luther? * 😉

Y’all are still in my prayers and this poor, silly Dr. Becker who thinks women can be ordained, especially. God love you who are praying that he comes back to sanity on these issues.
 
I’ve never been able to comprehend the notion that a punishment such as this is done out of love.
It might be helpful to understand the distinction between discipline and punishment? When your parents pulled two-year-old you away from the fire you so desperately wanted to touch, they did not stop loving you, no matter how much you kicked and screamed.

That’s because love is so much more than merely being nice and supporting others in their pursuits. Love redirects when those pursuits are harmful or dangerous. That’s not to say love is some perpetual killjoy – love is joy, yes, such joy! But love is also suffering for the benefit of another. This is why men are called to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and died for Her by ‘dying’ a bit each day (Eph. 5). That daily denial of self for another is love.

To put it simply, Love is not rainbows and unicorns (or tattoos and hiarspray, for that matter). Love is incalculably deeper.
 
What kind of “popular science” are they talking about? Is it the “popular science” used by archaeologists to prove, for example, that the Book of Joshua was not written before the monarchy but rather is a pious fiction probably put together by the so called Deuteronomistic historian or historians sometime in the 7th century BC? As noted by the archaeologists Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman in their book, The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001), pp. 81-82:
Christianity then becomes subject to the whims of the day, and the Church must consistently stick Her finger in the wind to determine whether Her teachings are acceptable in the light of popular morality and popular science.
Above is my original quote, where I had bolded as per above. I don’t think he is referring to architectural or historical findings, but rather pseudoscience, such as changing morality. What was wrong yesterday is suddenly right today. Changing Truth.
 
It might be helpful to understand the distinction between discipline and punishment? When your parents pulled two-year-old you away from the fire you so desperately wanted to touch, they did not stop loving you, no matter how much you kicked and screamed.

**That’s because love is so much more than merely being nice and supporting others in their pursuits. Love redirects when those pursuits are harmful or dangerous. **That’s not to say love is some perpetual killjoy – love is joy, yes, such joy! But love is also suffering for the benefit of another. This is why men are called to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and died for Her by ‘dying’ a bit each day (Eph. 5). That daily denial of self for another is love.

To put it simply, Love is not rainbows and unicorns (or tattoos and hiarspray, for that matter). Love is incalculably deeper.
👍👍

You said it better than I could.
 
It might be helpful to understand the distinction between discipline and punishment? When your parents pulled two-year-old you away from the fire you so desperately wanted to touch, they did not stop loving you, no matter how much you kicked and screamed.

That’s because love is so much more than merely being nice and supporting others in their pursuits. Love redirects when those pursuits are harmful or dangerous. That’s not to say love is some perpetual killjoy – love is joy, yes, such joy! But love is also suffering for the benefit of another. This is why men are called to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and died for Her by ‘dying’ a bit each day (Eph. 5). That daily denial of self for another is love.

To put it simply, Love is not rainbows and unicorns (or tattoos and hiarspray, for that matter). Love is incalculably deeper.
There’s a difference when talking about children and adults. I’ve been with my partner for more than 17 years, but his father (a Missouri Synod pastor) pretends that I don’t exist. My partner’s LCMS relatives have said that I’m not welcome to attend their family reunions with my partner. Most of them don’t even know me and have never met me. I’ve only met his father once. If that’s love…:confused:
 
It might be helpful to understand the distinction between discipline and punishment? When your parents pulled two-year-old you away from the fire you so desperately wanted to touch, they did not stop loving you, no matter how much you kicked and screamed.

That’s because love is so much more than merely being nice and supporting others in their pursuits. Love redirects when those pursuits are harmful or dangerous. That’s not to say love is some perpetual killjoy – love is joy, yes, such joy! But love is also suffering for the benefit of another. This is why men are called to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and died for Her by ‘dying’ a bit each day (Eph. 5). That daily denial of self for another is love.

To put it simply, Love is not rainbows and unicorns (or tattoos and hiarspray, for that matter). Love is incalculably deeper.
So Dr. Matthew Becker, an Associate Professor, is like a child who doesn’t know any better but people like Matthew Harrison are the adults who are only trying to discipline him? :rolleyes:
 
So Dr. Matthew Becker, an Associate Professor, is like a child who doesn’t know any better but people like Matthew Harrison are the adults who are only trying to discipline him? :rolleyes:
Friend, don’t make this personal: This is not “Harrison vs. Becker.” This is Becker vs. the very core teachings of the LCMS - the church with which he claimed to be walking together. The Synod rightly defended its teaching from a man who refused to conform to orthodox Lutheranism. The Synod has the responsibility to renounce false teachers and discipline them until they repent. Harrison has done his expected duty.

That said, I’m not sure you really want to compare the academic pedigrees between these two men.

The Rev. Dr. Matthew Harrison, President of the LCMS, with his Master of Divinity and Master of Sacred Theology degrees, and his honorary doctorate from Concordia Theological Seminary—Fort Wayne, and his honorary doctorate from Concordia University—Ann Arbor, has published many books, is the academic translator on Hermann Sasse (one of the greatest Lutheran theologians of the modern era), who has testified before the US Congress on behalf of Lutherans and other Christians (including Catholics), and, by the Grace of God, maintains the very same Confessional Lutheran views as the earliest Reformers.

Matthew Becker, on the other hand, is an Associate Professor.
 
How does his theology square with the early church ? Paul mentions 27 leaders of the early church by name in his Letters 10 of them were women !
 
How does his theology square with the early church ? Paul mentions 27 leaders of the early church by name in his Letters 10 of them were women !
Could you be more specific as to whose theology you are referring and what theology it is?

Regarding leaders in Paul’s letters, a leader is not to be confused with a ministerial function, such as a priest, who acts in persona Christi.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top