Paedophile network uncovered…WARNING: VERY SHOCKING

  • Thread starter Thread starter AveMaria5
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“If God doesn’t exist, then all acts are possible.” - Doestoyevsky

As more people are convinced that God doesn’t exist, the more prevalent these stories will become.
 
The problem is, there is NO ‘cure’ for pedophilia. When an adult is attracted to a child, they will ALWAYS be attracted to them, no matter how many hours of counseling they get.
I agree, but this does no mean the attraction must always bear as great a temptation. There is no cure for alcoholism, but there are many who overcome it. There is no cure for diabetes, yet there is treatment.
 
So nice that the first reaction of some is to defend homosexuality instead of the victim?? :confused:

This gay rights nonsense has gotten so far out of hand, as has the double standard of when underage girls vs young boys are abused. :mad:
 
I agree, but this does no mean the attraction must always bear as great a temptation. There is no cure for alcoholism, but there are many who overcome it. There is no cure for diabetes, yet there is treatment.
Yea, the solution is going to be in controlling their sex drives, thus saving alot of young kids in the process.

I do know from experience, most stronger opiate painkillers decrease sex drive to almost nothing!! If a pedophile looses their sex drive, they will still be attracted to kids, but wont feel the need to act on the temptation.
 
So nice that the first reaction of some is to defend homosexuality instead of the victim?? :confused:

This gay rights nonsense has gotten so far out of hand, as has the double standard of when underage girls vs young boys are abused. :mad:
Well, that is society as a whole…If you look at incidents where adult men have sex with underage females, most of society wants the guy hung on a tree, but when it involves a female adult having sex with an underage boy, the reaction is much more muted. I think this is because boys do not hold sex in the same regard as females, boys just see it as an act that feels good, females, especially young females see it as VERY important, emotional connection between 2 people, they dont view the sex act in the same way at all, the female is more concerned with the emotional side and the ‘inner feelings’ of it versus just the physical side of it.

So, of course to a young female, having sex is much more than just the act itself, to them, it is a very important connection, and if it is forced upon them or someone they dont really want to be with in this way, it will negatively effect them for the rest of their lives, but young boys will just get over it and move on to the next female they want to be with.
 
Yea, the solution is going to be in controlling their sex drives, thus saving alot of young kids in the process.

I do know from experience, most stronger opiate painkillers decrease sex drive to almost nothing!! If a pedophile looses their sex drive, they will still be attracted to kids, but wont feel the need to act on the temptation.
An earlier post sent me to check out this b4u-act group. I think your suggestion of chemical therapy might be a good one, especially combined with counseling and, God-willing, spiritual help. Such a one should never be around children alone, but such a person who took this path should be given the respect due the choices made contrary to desire and temptation.
 
Yes, but WHEN the homosexual community gets the law changed to include sexual orientation, then the pedophiles will sneak thru with this change, it will then be a crime to discriminate against them for ANY sexual orientation.
…which means what, exactly? Churches will be forced to officiate marriages between adults and children? Pedophile marriage cakes? Please. You do realize that many states and localities already offer protections based upon sexual orientation - I have yet to see one that protects pedophiles. Our society is collectively hysterical about child safety. Your predictions will not come to pass in any foreseeable iteration of the U.S. I can imagine.

Give me a date and place in the U.S. when you predict that it will be legal for a 40 year old to sexually molest a 6 year old and we will revisit this thread at that time to check your prediction.
 
The problem is, there is NO ‘cure’ for pedophilia. When an adult is attracted to a child, they will ALWAYS be attracted to them, no matter how many hours of counseling they get.
And an alcoholic is always an alcoholic, no matter how many hours of counseling they get. That does not mean treatment programs to help them abstain are not worthwhile.
The mainstream has pretty much proven homosexuality cannot be cured by going to a treatment center, I find it strange they are so willing to try the same exact thing for pedophilia, they already know treatment does nothing for sexual preferences, its amazing they try the same thing over and over and expect different results…is that not the literal definition of insanity?
You do realize that counseling people to abstain but not necessarily to change their attractions is the official approach of the official, approved ministry for homosexuals in the Catholic Church? I don’t think there is any official “pedophile” ministry but I can’t imagine the approach would be much different. “Conversion” ministries are the domain of evangelical protestants.
 
“If God doesn’t exist, then all acts are possible.” - Doestoyevsky

As more people are convinced that God doesn’t exist, the more prevalent these stories will become.
True, but it’s already happening as Christians keep God confined to the walls of a Church because some in the outside world might be offended.

Now, we can’t ever have that now, can we…:rolleyes:
 
…which means what, exactly? Churches will be forced to officiate marriages between adults and children? Pedophile marriage cakes? Please. You do realize that many states and localities already offer protections based upon sexual orientation - I have yet to see one that protects pedophiles. Our society is collectively hysterical about child safety. Your predictions will not come to pass in any foreseeable iteration of the U.S. I can imagine.

Give me a date and place in the U.S. when you predict that it will be legal for a 40 year old to sexually molest a 6 year old and we will revisit this thread at that time to check your prediction.
I dont know what our society will look like at this time, or how churches will react to this, but I doubt a 40 yr old will be able to marry a 6 yr old, even if pedophile laws are changed in anyway, there must be a line somewhere.

If you look back at history, people also thought the same thing about homosexuals, if you would have asked people back in the 50s if they thought gay people would at any point in the future, have the same rights as a man/ woman in a marriage, or if it would be literal crime to speak out against homosexuals…I can honestly say most people would have said NO WAY, not in a million years, but look at where we are today…

Im not claiming to know when this will happen, but I most certainly do believe the pedophile community will attempt to do the same thing the homosexuals have done, and I believe they will get what they desire!

They already have a good number of ‘experts’ saying pedophilia is something a person is born with, and they cannot change this, just like they argued successfully about being gay. It will likely take awhile, but in the end, Im fairly sure they will eventually be accepted, or at least the level of acceptance that gay people experience today.
 
So nice that the first reaction of some is to defend homosexuality instead of the victim?? :confused:

This gay rights nonsense has gotten so far out of hand, as has the double standard of when underage girls vs young boys are abused. :mad:
I find your comment interesting considering that the abuse was attributed to homosexuality in the very first post.

Child sexual abuse is atrocious but I’m not aware of evidence of a link to homosexual or heterosexual preferences.

I think it is critical for people to understand that homosexuality is not defined by who a person has sex with. Homosexuality involves the whole personality, not just sexual realtioms. Also, heterosexual people can indulge in same sex relations and those attracted to children, well - for them the operative word is ‘children’.

Just as another poster said, when we hear of opposite-sex child abuse, nobody starts talking about banning heterosexual adoption, so I don’t see why same-sex child abuse should be a gay-bashing conversation starter. If I oppose homosexual adoption, it would not be because I think kids stand a higher chance of being abused by gay parents, but because I believe that ideally kids need a mother and a father.
 
=seekerz;11805657]I find your comment interesting considering that the abuse was attributed to homosexuality in the very first post.
Child sexual abuse is atrocious but I’m not aware of evidence of a link to homosexual or heterosexual preferences.
I think it is critical for people to understand that homosexuality is not defined by who a person has sex with. Homosexuality involves the whole personality, not just sexual realtioms. Also, heterosexual people can indulge in same sex relations and those attracted to children, well - for them the operative word is ‘children’.
Just as another poster said, when we hear of opposite-sex child abuse, nobody starts talking about banning heterosexual adoption, so I don’t see why same-sex child abuse should be a gay-bashing conversation starter.
:confused:

These comments----perhaps— misunderstand my post. I was talking about heterosexual abuse of young men, not homosexual.

My point was that I’m convinced not every 12 year old boy would “like it” or “really wants it” in terms of getting physical with a 25 year-old female whereas if a 12 year old girl is abused by a 25 year-old guy it’s time to declare war and grab the pitchforks.

But in terms of homosexuality, well, of course, some in the secular Western world won’t pass up an opportunity to slam the Catholic Church even if it does mean homosexuality takes a black eye in the process. No, the target is just too tempting.
If I oppose homosexual adoption, it would not be because I think kids stand a higher chance of being abused by gay parents, but because I believe that ideally kids need a mother and a father.
That should be the argument, and it’s a pretty compelling one. I frown on equating homosexuality and pedophilia. Calling someone a pedophile seems to be a card that people play, sort of like calling someone a nazi or screaming racism.
 
So nice that the first reaction of some is to defend homosexuality instead of the victim?? :confused:

This gay rights nonsense has gotten so far out of hand, as has the double standard of when underage girls vs young boys are abused. :mad:
Well, look at the majority of these cases, when young boys are abused, (Im talking about ages from infant to 10-12 years old)…99.9% of the time, it is an adult MAN who is doing the abusing, in fact, Ive never heard of a case where an adult women sexually assaults a young boy…it is always an adult man, I think this is important to keep in mind.

Im not referring to murders either, Im aware there are plenty of adult women who kill young boys, but they dont sexually assault or rape them.

On the other hand, when a young female(again, ages from infant to 10-12), is sexually assaulted or raped, it is always an adult man.

These facts are curious to me.
 
Well, look at the majority of these cases, when young boys are abused, (Im talking about ages from infant to 10-12 years old)…99.9% of the time, it is an adult MAN who is doing the abusing, in fact, Ive never heard of a case where an adult women sexually assaults a young boy…it is always an adult man, I think this is important to keep in mind.

Im not referring to murders either, Im aware there are plenty of adult women who kill young boys, but they dont sexually assault or rape them.

On the other hand, when a young female(again, ages from infant to 10-12), is sexually assaulted or raped, it is always an adult man.

These facts are curious to me.
It is a myth that women don’t sexually abuse children. Current stats say around 10% of abuse being by women, but it is suspected that the numbers are much higher because many times women aren’t caught and/or reported. I saw a documentary of women in prison for sexual abuse several years ago. The stories of what these women did to their own children was sickening.
 
On the other hand, when a young female(again, ages from infant to 10-12), is sexually assaulted or raped, it is always an adult man.
“Always”?

A quick Google search for “convicted female rapist” yielded many examples involving many ages.
 
It’s in the past, so you’d need a time machine, but the age of consent in Delaware until 1880 was…seven.

chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/teaching-modules/230?section=primarysources&source=24
which is why I asked for a future date (besides, in your example, a 40-year-old man molesting a 7-year-old boy would never have been tolerated in practice anyway). In western nations, age of consent on a wide range of issues has almost inexorably increased over time. Sexual age of consent is not really an exception there, as your example shows. The decrease in voting age from 21 to 18 in the 1970’s was a big exception to that (as was the decrease in drinking age until that was abruptly reversed back to 21 in the 1980’s.)

There is no numerical statutory age of consent in Yemen - just so as long as the girl is married - and “suitable for sexual intercourse” - whatever that means. :eek:
 
👍

They - along with pedophiles, abortionists and terrorists - strengthen my commitment to being cautiously pro-death penalty.
You seem to believe that gay men are all paedophiles, yet you are pro death penalty. Jesus never said anything about homosexuality, but he did say, “Thou shall not kill”. I understand the human temptation for justice, but we are meant to moderate the impulse to kill, whether state mandated or not. The Cathecism urges that the DP only be used for safety reasons basically. “The cases in which execution of the offender is an absolute necessity 'are very rare, if practically nonexistent”.
 
You seem to believe that gay men are all paedophiles, yet you are pro death penalty. Jesus never said anything about homosexuality, but he did say, “Thou shall not kill”. I understand the human temptation for justice, but we are meant to moderate the impulse to kill, whether state mandated or not. The Cathecism urges that the DP only be used for safety reasons basically. “The cases in which execution of the offender is an absolute necessity 'are very rare, if practically nonexistent”.
He did not say he was pro-death penalty, I believe he said that in particular cases the option of the death penalty is compelling. Moreover, Jesus was a Jew who followed the mosaic law to the tee, thus he must have believed in the morality that it expressed on issues such as homosexuality . . . . etc.

P.S. The apostles having been designated leaders of the church by Jesus made sure to deliver the untainted message they received to all his followers, i.e., homosexuality is mentioned in the N.T…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top