Any act of child abuse is evil, but I feel in my heart that child sexual abuse is among the “worst of the worst” of all forms of child abuse, whether it happens in birth families or adoptive families. Any parents who are pedophiles, and who create/obtain, betray and utilize their own children also are committing incest, which is a separate crime and especially disgusting act in and of itself. (Incestuous acts might also be committed among other family members, not necessarily including those who are parents.)
Without expressing or choosing sides with regard to homosexuals, their rights or lack thereof, marriages, legality, prejudices, etc., please allow me to state emphatically the following: a person who is homosexual is not necessarily a pedophile, and a person who is a pedophile is not necessarily a homosexual.
It is not a fact that this disgusting excuse for a human being is the same as any other homosexual individual (male or female) who is an adoptive parent (or birth parent). This person is a criminal, who planned, plotted and practiced evil upon a person who would have trusted him and loved him the most in all the world – a child, who called him Dad.
This sick individual had known for years that his sexual proclivities were not classified as society’s norm, and carefully hid it from anyone who might then point the finger. He found companionship amongst his own diseased kind, who also were hidden in the darkness, away from the light of the law. As an extended group of pedophiles, they conspired to commit more crimes against children, and worldwide society as a whole. This fellow’s cover story involved a fake “child modeling” business.
These quotes from the article shed some light into what I have said:
Code:
"I just think the lengths that they must have gone to, the planning that was involved, the amount of secrecy, the deception, deceiving their own family, friends, neighbours, into believing that everything that was happening was just a **legitimate scenario**."
Truong and Newton made emotional pleas to family and friends in Australia for help, claiming they were being **discriminated against based on their sexuality**. Their story was picked up by the media.
Detective Inspector Rouse has told Four Corners that Truong and Newton's claim of **discrimination is offensive and completely unfounded**.
**"This has never, ever, ever been about your gender or your sexual preference in terms of consenting adults and what they do," he said.**
"We were acting in the direct interests of a young boy that we [believed] had been sexually abused. **If they'd been a male and female partner we would have done exactly the same things that we did and we did nothing wrong.**"
***Detective Sergeant Ian Wells says Truong and Newton were master manipulators, using gay marriage as a cover.***
After reading this article and many more over the last couple of years, it seems to me that most likely Truong and Newton were not even (practicing) homosexuals. It seems most likely that they their “relationship” as “partners” was a full-blown fraud. They were not interested in having sex with each other, or other grown men, or even adult women. They were interested only in CHILDREN.
PEDOPHILIA =/= homosexuality
homosexuality =/= PEDOPHILIA
Regardless, I hope these criminals don’t have a moment of peace, and that they suffer through their legal punishments.
