O
O_Duirnin
Guest
As an additional point, as a Scotsman, would you say my country doesn’t exist, seeing as we don’t yet have full independence?
What does independence have to do with existance?As an additional point, as a Scotsman, would you say my country doesn’t exist, seeing as we don’t yet have full independence?
Well, Scotland has a flag, but it doesn’t have an official anthem, nor a President.What does independence have to do with existance?
There is no, nor was there ever, a Palestine.
I’ve asked twice for their flag, anthem. president. Why do you ignore that?
Do you support the Tamil Tigers? The LRA?![]()
I asked for the Palistinian flag, not the British mandate.Well, Scotland has a flag, but it doesn’t have an official anthem, nor a President.
This is the flag used by the British Mandate between the 1920s and 1940s: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filealestine-Mandate-Ensign-1927-1948.svg
That flag was the internationally recognised flag of Palestine, of the internationally recognised Government of Palestine, at that point in history. I believe there was even a Palestinian national football team, with players from both communities.I asked for the Palistinian flag, not the British mandate.
When someone asks for the Scottish flag do you show the Union Jack?
I asked for the Palistinian anthem and president, not Scotland’s.![]()
The USA boasts about how it’s so pro-Israel and yet when 7 out of 10 Israeli people say they want a Palestinian state, the US is against them?US is threatening to with hold funds (about 1/4 of their budget)
There was no Palestine. There was a British controlled area. Why you can’t accept this escapes me.That flag was the internationally recognised flag of Palestine, of the internationally recognised Government of Palestine, at that point in history. I believe there was even a Palestinian national football team, with players from both communities.
There is no direct comparison here between the use of the Saltire versus the use of the Union Jack. This flag was only used in Palestine, which was then under a British Mandate.
Nonsense. Why the rhetoric?The USA boasts about how it’s so pro-Israel and yet when 7 out of 10 Israeli people say they want a Palestinian state, the US is against them?
Amin al-Husayni was the closest thing to a President there was at the time. Palestine was governed by the Arab Higher Committee of which he was the Chairman.So, who was President of Palestine in 1947?
avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/plocov.aspCan you point me to their constitution?
Flag?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_anthem_of_PalestineNational Anthem?![]()
Nonsense? Rhetoric? It’s the absolute truthNonsense. Why the rhetoric?![]()
So, you acknowledge there was no president, flag or anthem. Thanks.Amin al-Husayni is the closest thing to a President there was at the time. Palestine was governed by the Arab Higher Committee of which he was the Chairman.
avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/plocov.asp
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Palestine.svg/320px-Flag_of_Palestine.svg.png
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_anthem_of_Palestine
An dhow is “the US against them”?Nonsense? Rhetoric? It’s the absolute truth
I already said why. The Israeli’s want a Palestinian state, but the government doesn’t. The USA is therefore pro-Israeli government, but not pro-Israel. If America was pro-Israel, they’d be against the government and in favour of the peopleAn dhow is “the US against them”?
Americans are more pro-Israel than the Israelis, it seems.The USA boasts about how it’s so pro-Israel and yet when 7 out of 10 Israeli people say they want a Palestinian state, the US is against them?
Your argument is baffing. You compare the Palestinians to the Tamil Tigers, a false comparison, by the way, because the Palestinians are a demographic group, not an organizaton; better compared to the Tamil people. Now, the Tamil people, in Sri Lanka and in India, do in fact have seperatist groups. What it worth noting, however, is that they are acknowledged as seperatist groups. They are, as claimed by India and Sri Lanka, Indians and Sri Lankans respectively. They have Indian or Sri Lankan citizenship.There was no Palestine. There was a British controlled area. Why you can’t accept this escapes me.
Unless, of course, it sinks all your arguments?
the purpose of the UN is twofold. Pass resolutions condemning Israel and find **ways to spend United States money promoting causes that are against the interests of the United States. **
So…just to be clear, you believe it makes sense for us to spend $6B+ per year (~25% of their budget) to fund an organization to work against our own efforts? :ehh:Someone has to help balance out the purpose of the American state department: unconditionally support Israel even when it’s against American interests (and when it’s against Israeli interests) and use tax payers’ money to systematically erode the American reputation abroad.
Yeah, left. Much like the Cherokees “left” Georgia to go “back” to Oklahoma.So, you acknowledge there was no president, flag or anthem. Thanks.
I’m glad the “Palistinians” use the term “right of return”. At least they acknowledge the fact they left.![]()
God willing the Israelis will soon take back their country from that nut Netanyahu. They should remember that he was the one who stood in front of a crowd carrying posters comparing Yitzhak Rabin to a Nazi, and he edified them. Much as we here about the great civility of the right in politics on this forum, that has to be the worst poolitical insult ever delivered. To portray a loyal, patriotic Israeli Jew like Rabin to a Nazi, a man who would later die for his country at the hand of an extremist rightist, is unthinkable. And Netanyahu didn’t say anythin; he just assented. If I were him, I would’ve withdrawn from politics forever after rabin’s assassination in shame, from some of the things he said about him. Given the utter failure of the Likud’s tenure thus far, though, we may hope that they will be out of power soon enough.I already said why. The Israeli’s want a Palestinian state, but the government doesn’t. The USA is therefore pro-Israeli government, but not pro-Israel. If America was pro-Israel, they’d be against the government and in favour of the people
Either you are being intentionally disingenuious or you are just ignorant. Which is it?I already said why. The Israeli’s want a Palestinian state, but the government doesn’t. The USA is therefore pro-Israeli government, but not pro-Israel. If America was pro-Israel, they’d be against the government and in favour of the people
So the Cherokees left Georgia and told everyone they would wipe the white man off the face of the earth?Yeah, left. Much like the Cherokees “left” Georgia to go “back” to Oklahoma.
God willing the Israelis will soon take back their country from that nut Netanyahu. They should remember that he was the one who stood in front of a crowd carrying posters comparing Yitzhak Rabin to a Nazi, and he edified them. Much as we here about the great civility of the right in politics on this forum, that has to be the worst poolitical insult ever delivered. To portray a loyal, patriotic Israeli Jew like Rabin to a Nazi, a man who would later die for his country at the hand of an extremist rightist, is unthinkable. And Netanyahu didn’t say anythin; he just assented. If I were him, I would’ve withdrawn from politics forever after rabin’s assassination in shame, from some of the things he said about him. Given the utter failure of the Likud’s tenure thus far, though, we may hope that they will be out of power soon enough.
How insulting. What honestly could possess you to believe that I’m disingenuous or ignorant? I’m being rationalEither you are being intentionally disingenuious or you are just ignorant. Which is it?![]()
Well, you said 7 of 10 Israelis want a Palestine state but the US is against them.How insulting. What honestly could possess you to believe that I’m disingenuous or ignorant? I’m being rational