Pataki says Kid Rock is just what the Senate needs

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertmidwest
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
George Pataki wouldn’t support Trump, yet he supports Kid Rock. Okay.
 
You could choose 535 names randomly from a phone book and you could not possibly do worse than what we have.
 
We’ve had plenty of actors and comedians who entered Congress. I see no reason to exclude Kid Rock.
Well, he seems like a complete moron, for one. There are videos out there of him receiving oral sex from groupies after his shows, for another, which seems to me to be beneath the dignity of the Senate. 🤷
 
Well, he seems like a complete moron, for one. There are videos out there of him receiving oral sex from groupies after his shows, for another, which seems to me to be beneath the dignity of the Senate. 🤷
Bill Clinton did the same thing, just didn’t happen to get caught on video, probably because there weren’t cell phones with video cameras back in his day. And he became President. Pretty sure Kennedy and LBJ were no slouches in this area either.

A lot of men likely find such behavior enviable rather than moronic.
 
Bill Clinton did the same thing, just didn’t happen to get caught on video, probably because there weren’t cell phones with video cameras back in his day. And he became President. Pretty sure Kennedy and LBJ were no slouches in this area either.

A lot of men likely find such behavior enviable rather than moronic.
Well, a lot of people are dumb and insecure and want to see idiots in power because it reassures them that no one is “better than them.”

I mean, what’s the affirmative case for Kid Rock in the Senate? The US Senate needs more horrible rap-rock from a guy in track pants? Has Kid Rock spent the last few years educating himself on policy and making cogent critiques of the ACA? What’s the appeal?

I’m sick to death of idiots treating our democracy like a reality show or a novelty.
 
George Pataki just can’t accept the fact that his political career ended in 2006, can he? What a pathetic attempt to get his name in the papers again.

What’s next, Rudy Giuliani endorsing Kid Rock? Actually, that wouldn’t surprise me.
I bet Pataki could give Charles Schumer or the NY junior Senator a run for their money.

I wish either him or Rudy would run for Senate. It’d be nice to see the boroughs trend red.
 
[BoomBoomMancini;14849999]Well, he seems like a complete moron, for one.
Translation: He can win and we on the left are angry about it. :mad::mad::mad::mad: See?
There are videos out there of him receiving oral sex from groupies after his shows, for another, which seems to me to be beneath the dignity of the Senate. 🤷
Ad hominem.

BTW, where was all this concern about homosexual activity when so-called gay “marriage” was being debated?

I love how on the internet the Catholic left is suddenly oh-sooooo concerned about the moral status of personal lives of politicians when they are on the right.
 
Translation: He can win and we on the left are angry about it. :mad::mad::mad::mad: See?

Ad hominem.

BTW, where was all this concern about homosexual activity when so-called gay “marriage” was being debated?

I love how on the internet the Catholic left is suddenly oh-sooooo concerned about the moral status of personal lives of politicians when they are on the right.
I know you’re contractually obligated to go into redpill mode* at least ten times a day, but A) that’s not what I said, at all B) why do you assume I’m ‘on the left’ C) who said anything about homosexual activity? :confused: and D) maybe the concern about the morality of right-leaning politicians private lives comes from the fact that right-wingers are always talking about moral decline?
 
I bet Pataki could give Charles Schumer or the NY junior Senator a run for their money.

I wish either him or Rudy would run for Senate. It’d be nice to see the boroughs trend red.
Actually the NY junior Senator might be considering a higher office.
 
=BoomBoomMancini;14850498]I know you’re contractually obligated to go into redpill mode* at least ten times a day, but
OH, burn. Attempted insult received as a compliment. 😃

Luigi = 1 UP. :getholy::angel1::newidea:😉
D) maybe the concern about the morality of right-leaning politicians private lives comes from the fact that right-wingers are always talking about moral decline?
:dts:

Comes from the classic left-wing double standard.
 
Well, a lot of people are dumb and insecure and want to see idiots in power because it reassures them that no one is “better than them.”

I mean, what’s the affirmative case for Kid Rock in the Senate? The US Senate needs more horrible rap-rock from a guy in track pants? Has Kid Rock spent the last few years educating himself on policy and making cogent critiques of the ACA? What’s the appeal?

I’m sick to death of idiots treating our democracy like a reality show or a novelty.
Precedent: the stand up comedian … who needed illegal votes from convicts.

Al Franken.
 
OH, burn. Attempted insult received as a compliment. 😃

Luigi = 1 UP. :getholy::angel1::newidea:😉

:dts:

Comes from the classic left-wing double standard.
In response to your PM that I’m somehow obsessed with you:

I actually find you to be one of the more boring regular posters in the World News forum. I’ve never seen a post of yours where I wouldn’t have been able to predict what your take would be in advance. There’s almost no nuance or original thought. It’s just the endless invocation of left/right memes. You’re like a Teddy Ruxpin doll that just parrots partisan talking points when your string is pulled.

It’s kind of a shame, too, because you’re clearly not dumb. But I do wish you would stop gorging yourself on partisan fever and making yourself a caricature.

Although I should say that I’m still interested in you clarifying your comments about “some lynchings” being unjust.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top