No, He wouldn’t become a “puppet”, but He would allow the gift of creating life to be abused, and He wouldn’t penalize the child for it. The clones would have human souls.
There’s currently no federal law, so I was mistaken. There are 13 states that ban human cloning.
So since I was incorrect, and it appears that human cloning is legal in some places, does that change your answer? Shouldn’t those clones be protected under this law?
No, human cloning is not technically legal in the U.S. and the Catholic Church has consistenly spoken out against it. The UN passed a nonbinding resolution to ban human cloning.
Can you back that up with any documentation or is it just your personal view? I’ve never seen anything to that effect from the Church. The Church does denounce cloning, but I believe it would still give human “status” to the victims.
There is no documentation. This year the first human embryos outside the womb, in the lab were created in England. I am asking these questions because they are not being discussed within in the framework of when human beings are fully human.
any human embryo created by mad scientists who think they are God by cloning, or genetically modifying the human species. Please get on the bandwagon and have Congress Ryan strike that portion of the bill that allows for the cloning of human embryos and the possible genetic manipulation of the human being.
A subhuman creature created by mad scientists would not be a human being. Do you have any idea what some of these mad scientists are already doing to animal species and would like to do to the human species. Please we do not need any more Josef Mengeles.I find it hard to believe that you are truly wishing God’s peace while at the same time saying you would abort a human being.
So, this is what it means to be 100% pro-life. Subhuman, mosters, human monsters should just be destroyed. I understand now
Yes, of course. Since people NEVER violate the law.
So if they aren’t “people.” would you also kill them after they are born???
Just like God destrroyed the giants that were created by the fallen angels. Except in our case we can avoid that by OUTLAWING the cloning of human embryos and genetic modification of human embryos instead of trying to protect them under the US Constitution. Your logic is illogical.So, this is what it means to be 100% pro-life. Subhuman, mosters, human monsters should just be destroyed. I understand now
We do not even have to go there. We do not even want to imagine what havoc that mad, and immoral scientists unfettered could unleash on this earth.Yes, of course. Since people NEVER violate the law.
Of course it is
What about cloned individuals already five years old, ten years old. Do we kill them on the grounds that they are human monsters? Why? or why not? After all, they are ‘subhuman’ and ‘monsters’ and comparable to ‘God destroyed the giants that were created by the fallen angels’ according to you.If it’s clearly against Catholic teaching, then I don’t understand why you can’t find a single source to back up your claim that a clone would be “sub-human”??
I simply take the sacred scriptures for what they say. We are created in the image and likeness of God, and by God. We each have unique attributes including fingerprints.
Clones are still created by God because only God can create life. You have trouble with this because you’re giving human beings power that they don’t have. God alone is the giver of life.
I would disagree with you. Each one of us are created in the image and likeness of God and we each have our unique attributes including fingerprints.
You don’t understand what a clone really is, my friend. It’s a genetic copy, but that doesn’t mean it will be an identical person. A clone would actually have different fingerprints, because fingerprints develop somewhat-randomly inside the womb. They are based on genetic code, so your clone would have similar fingerprints (just like an identical twin would have similar fingerprints), but not exactly the same. Likewise, everything else would be similar, but not exactly identical. Your personalities could end up being vastly different, depending on the environment you each grew up in.
What half-animal/half-human beings are you talking about?
I was using hypebole as if the science is there, and if it is permitted, it will be done. (I am referring to the creatures of Greek and Egyptian mythology).
They could issue an executive order, making abortion illegal. Presidents have used executive orders many times in the past for sweeping policy changes. If Abe Lincoln could suspend habeas corpus during the Civil War and FDR could steal all privately owned gold in 1933, then it seems like an abortion ban is also possible. It would probably go back to the Supreme Court in short order, but at least they would have a chance to undo the damage they did in 1973.