D
DeSanto
Guest
I didn’t see it. If I may, what is your response?There is already a thread on this.
I didn’t see it. If I may, what is your response?There is already a thread on this.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=718588I didn’t see it. If I may, what is your response?
not very convincing. this would not be the first time romneys aides and surrogates had to actually contradict romneys own words. Why can we not just go by what Romney himself says?
This comment speaks volumes.You need to vote for Romney to get rid of Obama. I’m voting Todd Akin only to get rid of Claire.![]()
Again, it seems Romney should be able to speak for himself.Romney: “I don’t - there’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda.”
He simply stated that, to his knowledge, he is unaware of any specific pending legislation on abortion that he would incorporate into his agenda. He may propose legislation or entertain future legislation, if proposed by Congress. I conclude his statement is not a change of position at all.
Paul Ryan was responding to a question. If he had deferred answering it, you would beAgain, it seems Romney should be able to speak for himself.
I agree. It speaks of wisdom in a fellow Missourian.This comment speaks volumes.
Tell that to Jay.Again, it seems Romney should be able to speak for himself.
You quoted Romney so he IS speaking for himself. You simply misinterpreted him or you don’t understand the point. There is no current legislation with regard to abortion that can become part of his platform. Why do you continue to argue the point that Romney didn’t make?Again, it seems Romney should be able to speak for himself.
This comment speaks volumes.
Even more so about Clair McCaskill. She needs to go.I agree. It speaks of wisdom in a fellow Missourian.![]()
We ought not be led off topic. There already is a thread about this.You quoted Romney so he IS speaking for himself. You simply misinterpreted him or you don’t understand the point. There is no current legislation with regard to abortion that can become part of his platform. Why do you continue to argue the point that Romney didn’t make?
Lisa
And the change is?Romney has yet again changed his position on abortion. At what point does good political strategy become plain deceitfulness. If one claims abortion is the main driver for their vote, are we just to ignore this strategic move back to the center? Otherwise, as I suspected, it’s more of a hate for Obama that is the driver not the actual policies.
Romney: “I don’t - there’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda.”
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9599698/US-election-2012-Mitt-Romneys-stance-on-abortion-changes-then-changes-again.html
How is it looking there, amica mia?
opensecrets.org/news/2012/10/hot-race-for-missouri-senate-seat-c.htmlA poll released by We Ask America on Oct. 2 shows McCaskill had a lead of less than a percentage point over Akin, 46 to 45.2; that’s less than the margin of error, with 8.8 percent of voters undecided. However, Public Policy Polling numbers show McCaskill up, 46 to 40, with 9 percent for Libertarian Jonathan Dine and 5 percent undecided.
You are dead wrong about that. Ryan is well known for his expertise in economic matters, something sadly lacking in the entire Obama administration. He is well experienced in how legislation is enacted whereas Romney understand the executive side of things. Ryan’s Road to Prosperity was the foundation for the budgets he has proposed. He is a deep thinker, a numbers guru and a man of great principle.Obama has made clear he doesn’t feel he should be paying less in taxes than middle class, blue collar workers. He wants to increase his own taxes and believes that it is necessary to strengthen our economy.
The majority of this thread is about Romney and Obama. Probably because other than Ryan’s budget and his religious affiliation, he has no real significance in this race.
Or she is.In saying he’s not important I have to believe you are not well acquainted with him or his policies.
Lisa
You never disappoint, Lisa. Ever the Romney and Ryan devotee. I admire your daring to say that expertise in economic matters is something sadly lacking in the entire Obama Administration. The entire Administration? As Seinfeld would have said, “Really?”You are dead wrong about that. Ryan is well known for his expertise in economic matters, something sadly lacking in the entire Obama administration. He is well experienced in how legislation is enacted whereas Romney understand the executive side of things. Ryan’s Road to Prosperity was the foundation for the budgets he has proposed. He is a deep thinker, a numbers guru and a man of great principle.
Further he is an outstanding communicator. He can explain complex budget and economic matters in a way that heck even Joe Biden might understand!
Along with his deep faith and his values that I share, Ryan has political courage, another missing element in the Obama administration. When he first proposed his budgets, his plans to make Medicare and Social Security solvent, he was attacked by both left and right. He didn’t back down but simply and effectively explained HOW his plans would work. He now is THE spokesman for the Republican economic proposals.
Ryan is an extremely valuable part of this ticket. In saying he’s not important I have to believe you are not well acquainted with him or his policies.
If they had any expertise in economic matters, we wouldn’t have a $16 trillion debt and annual deficits of $1 trillion plus.You never disappoint, Lisa. Ever the Romney and Ryan devotee. I admire your daring to say that expertise in economic matters is something sadly lacking in the entire Obama Administration. The entire Administration? As Seinfeld would have said, “Really?”![]()
Rich, just look at the results. If the Obama Administration has anyone that could right the economy they are keeping that person in an undisclosed location. The economy is a DISASTER. This is really really bad and if you are in a business as I am, you know the uncertainty, the over-regulation, the tax burden coming all serve to keep businesses from expanding or hiring.You never disappoint, Lisa. Ever the Romney and Ryan devotee. I admire your daring to say that expertise in economic matters is something sadly lacking in the entire Obama Administration. The entire Administration? As Seinfeld would have said, “Really?”![]()