Lots of people on this thread and on this forum. They are using the same “arguments” you have stated on this thread to support their contention that the Democratic Party positions are in line with Catholic social teaching. They could not be more ill-formed or more poorly catechized.
No, but this thread is increasingly about how “un-Catholic” any non-Democratic-Party position is. And I’m here to tell you that there is zero support, either in tradiitonal Catholicism, or in modern Catholicsm, from St. Peter to Pope Benedict XVI, which equates Romney’s or Ryan’s positions with opposing Catholic social teaching as a whole, or which suggests that a vote for either is a vote against Catholic social justice.
Well, for one thing, it means the opposite of your understanding, which is frankly poor, and underdeveloped, at least as you have expressed them on this thread with regard to Catholic social teaching. I have already highlighted those poor understandings, earlier on the thread.
Full just means comprehensive as to essentials. It is a moral requirement of every Catholic beyond Confirmation to become fully acquainted with the essentials of Catholic moral teaching (including how those precepts and principles apply to contemporary political issues); those are insufficiently presented within RCIA programs, and they most certainly do not correspond with your telescoped and partial view of the Church’s social doctrine.
Another example in which you fail to understand your faith. Catholics have a grave duty, according to every Pope from Peter to BXVI, to apply their own full understanding of Catholic priorities to their voting decisions. It has nothing to do with selling out to a “non-Catholic nation” or to the original deist founders. Our grave moral obligation as Catholics is to witness to our faith in every realm, including the civic/political realm. This is just one of the many examples of your failure to understand your faith.