Pauls writtings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven_John
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I kinda figure i maybe taking things out of context and i am poorly educated so please be gentle with me.
I am looking from a scripture point of view just in the narrated words of Jesus (pbwh).

I am not keen on the testimony of sinners, without disrespect to the and Gods goodness in them but we sinners make error.
If this is the case (not being keen on the testimony) then you are in really bad shape. That narrative of Jesus’ words was produced by “sinners” who gave their human testimony to what they saw and heard. If you can’t be “keen” on it, then why are you bothering to read it?
I dont know that Paul being tortured makes him right, he could have believed he was being duped by satan or more over having Jewish understanding believed it would be worth it to mislead Christ followers give his persecution was not making head way.
Have you ever read what Paul wrote? If you do, you will find that he did not believe he was being duped by Satatn. He also did not believe that he was misleading Christ’s followers. Why is it important for you to believe Paul was an apostate?
Paul seems to offer Jesus (pbwh) was equal to God but Jesus (pbwh) over and over says the Father sent me, i did not come of me, i only do as the Father shows etc.
Jesus mission and humility as a human does not change the fact that He was God in the flesh.
Jesus (pbwh) says he came to fulfil the law and but Paul says he abolished it.
Only the ceremonial law was abolished, since there was no longer a need for it. This is not from “Paul” but is the teaching of the Church. Paul taught as Jesus commissioned him, that the moral law is fufilled in Christ, and that we can also keep it by grace.
Here is another doosy

May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, …

…that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ…

Who is Paul?

Even Jesus (pbwh) has not done this.
Done what? Recognized that God is reconciling the world to Himself throught the cross of Christ?

Yes, Jesus did “do” that!
God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

Baloney Paul he is a sacrifice for our sins, he was given the pure spirit so is without sin
What you are saying is “Paul’s writings” is the Christian gospel, Steven. It was being preached and lived by Catholics long before Paul was even converted. Jesus is the pure lamb of God, sacrificed for our sins. In another thread I read where you are familiar with the Passover. If this is true, then you know that a spotless lamb was required for the sacrifice.
could you please help me by explaining your prayer inspiration on this

May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, …

…that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ…
I think it will be difficult to help you with your misunderstanding in this area, because you do not understand what Christianity is all about.

However, we can try. Mankind was separated from God by sin. Jesus shed His blood to cover the sins of the world. By His cross, where His spotless blood was shed to cover our sins, He reconciles the world to Himself. when we are baptized into Christ, we are baptized into His death. We embrace the cross, so that we can die to the lustful desires of the flesh and the world, and embrace eternal life.
 
I am not going to check out Sams offering yet, No disrespect to you Brother but was looking for Christian help so while i am getting it will stay on track. Islamic beliefs are different in some aspects so it may introduce more variables. I do intend to look later, so thanks.

Jesus (pbwh) says he came to fulfill the law and but Paul says he abolished it.

Matthew 5:17
17`Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets – I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;

Ephesians 2:15
15the enmity in his flesh, the law of the commands in ordinances having done away, that the two he might create in himself into one new man, making peace,

In the words of Jesus (pbwh) i understand that he shows fulfillment of the law that is that we will obey out of love and desire not obligation while desiring what is outside the law.

The Pauline scripture in its second part says this but in the first offers the law is done away or in my words abolished. This contradicts the words of Jesus (pbwh).

The law surely still stands, it is not ok to steal, not just because God says so but because Jesus (pbwh) shows so.

I have prody mates who because of Pauls words say they are not under the law, i say to them we are all subject to the law. I understand God is merciful, offers us pardon to be repentant and believe the good news. The repentance is about us being away from the law. His grace does not abolish the law only its consequence.
 
I am not going to check out Sams offering yet, No disrespect to you Brother but was looking for Christian help so while i am getting it will stay on track. Islamic beliefs are different in some aspects so it may introduce more variables. I do intend to look later, so thanks.

Jesus (pbwh) says he came to fulfill the law and but Paul says he abolished it.

Matthew 5:17
17`Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets – I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;

Ephesians 2:15
15the enmity in his flesh, the law of the commands in ordinances having done away, that the two he might create in himself into one new man, making peace,

In the words of Jesus (pbwh) i understand that he shows fulfillment of the law that is that we will obey out of love and desire not obligation while desiring what is outside the law.
Yes,but there are two different aspects of law being mentioned here. Jesus fulfilled the ceremonial law (ordinances). He was the culmination of all of them, and all their purpose was fulfulled in Him. The moral law, yes, you are right, we obey out of love and desire, not obligation. This is what Paul taught. This is what was taught to Paul. This is the teaching of the Church.
Code:
The Pauline scripture in its second part says this but in the first offers the law is done away or in my words abolished. This contradicts the words of Jesus (pbwh).
There is no contradiction between the teachings of St. Paul,and the teaching of Jesus. If it seems like there is one, it is because you don’t understand what Paul is saying, or Jesus is saying, or both!
Code:
The law surely still stands, it is not ok to steal, not just because God says so but because Jesus (pbwh) shows so.
You are absolutely right. See what St. Paul teaches about God’s moral law:

1 Tim 1:9-11
9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 in accordance with the glorious gospel of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.

Sound doctrine (Christianity) upholds keeping of the moral law of God.

“There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil”
Rom 2:9

9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Cor 6:9-10

Just as the moral law of God was fulfilled in Christ, so it is fulfilled in us as we walk according to His plan.
Code:
 I have mates who because of Pauls words say they are not under the law, i say to them we are all subject to the law. I understand God is merciful, offers us pardon to be repentant and believe the good news. The repentance is about us being away from the law. His grace does not abolish the law only its consequence.
Both of you have misunderstood. The fact that we are not “under law” does not equate to not following the law. We are not obligated to the ceremonial ordinances given to the Jews. We follow God’s moral law by grace, through faith. God’s grace does not abolish the consequences of law breaking either, if people do not repent.

Rom 6:1-4
6:1 What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound? 2 By no means! How can we who died to sin still live in it? 3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

We have an obligation to repent, die to our sins, and walk in the newness of life (holiness) provided by Christ.
 
Simple answer to the OP’s question: nope.

I might suggest that for specific verses, you consult a “entry level” bible commentary. Some of them can be rather intellectual and involved, giving way more information and assuming that the reader is a biblical scholar.

It’s also helpful to investigate Paul’s perspective in his letters. Might I recommend a very readable text on Paul and his writings, “Paul in Chains” by Fr. Cassidy:

search.barnesandnoble.com/Paul-in-Chains/Richard-J-Cassidy/e/9780824519216

You can probably find used paperback copies online for less coin.
 
guanophores
post and others have helped me much, sorting what i guess was already there, knowing there was much of context in pauls letters.

The Gospel narrations of Jesus (pbwh) are just so straight and simple i may have projected my love of clarity in them to the letters of paul.

God bless yas all
 
When i read all things Torah, Prophetic books, Gospels, Letters, Quran or anything

I must ask with an open mind How can this be true of Gods goodness

rather than looking for error and when i perceive error in any of them

i should ask people close to them and discern on their loving insight.

Worked for me here, do you all think it is a truth for us all always?
 
I am not going to check out Sams offering yet, No disrespect to you Brother but was looking for Christian help so while i am getting it will stay on track. Islamic beliefs are different in some aspects so it may introduce more variables. I do intend to look later, so thanks.

Jesus (pbwh) says he came to fulfill the law and but Paul says he abolished it.

Matthew 5:17
17`Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets – I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;

Ephesians 2:15
15the enmity in his flesh, the law of the commands in ordinances having done away, that the two he might create in himself into one new man, making peace,

In the words of Jesus (pbwh) i understand that he shows fulfillment of the law that is that we will obey out of love and desire not obligation while desiring what is outside the law.

The Pauline scripture in its second part says this but in the first offers the law is done away or in my words abolished. This contradicts the words of Jesus (pbwh).

The law surely still stands, it is not ok to steal, not just because God says so but because Jesus (pbwh) shows so.

I have prody mates who because of Pauls words say they are not under the law, i say to them we are all subject to the law. I understand God is merciful, offers us pardon to be repentant and believe the good news. The repentance is about us being away from the law. His grace does not abolish the law only its consequence.
Thank you Steven John. I thought before you that you may have found that quote(s) from a website that pieced them together in an unrelated manner in order to make a point, but you seem to be struggling with St Paul’s relationship to Jesus in regards to doctrine and the meaning of the coming of Christ.

The intent of the law is made more clear throughout the OT, but I believe this to be at the heart of it

Jeremiah 4:4 Circumcise yourselves to the LORD, remove the foreskin of your hearts, O men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem; lest my wrath go forth like fire, and burn with none to quench it, because of the evil of your doings."

as well as

Deuteronomy 30:6 And the LORD your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live.

Jesus explains some things regarding the dietary requirements of the law vs the intent of the law.

Mat 15:10 And he called the people to him and said to them, “Hear and understand:
Mat 15:11 not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man.”
Mat 15:12 Then the disciples came and said to him, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?”

and further

Mat 15:17 Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach, and so passes on?
Mat 15:18 But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a man.
Mat 15:19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander.
Mat 15:20 These are what defile a man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man."

Mat 22:36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?”
Mat 22:37 And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.
Mat 22:38 This is the great and first commandment.
Mat 22:39 And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Mat 22:40 On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.”

and the continuation by St Paul

Rom 2:25 Circumcision indeed is of value if you obey the law; but if you break the law, your circumcision becomes uncircumcision.
Rom 2:26 So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
Rom 2:27 Then those who are physically uncircumcised but keep the law will condemn you who have the written code and circumcision but break the law.
Rom 2:28 For he is not a real Jew who is one outwardly, nor is true circumcision something external and physical.
Rom 2:29 He is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual and not literal. His praise is not from men but from God.

When Jesus said that eating with unwashed hands and worrying about what you put into your mouth do not defile you he was speaking specifically about the law by which it was prescribed that you must baptize (ritually wash) your hands before eating and avoid certain foods lest you defile yourself before God. He also made the point by saying “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” to suggest that these laws were for the benefit of men, so that we may learn from God to rest, wash, avoid illness, but also how to treat each other properly, and not so much in order to follow these rituals in a self serving manner, as they were followed by the Pharisees, as an excuse to condemn others and keep them segregated and outcast from society, without love or compassion.

By taking all of these things into proper context and as a whole, not separate, can we see what Jesus was trying to teach us. St Paul also, who had previously been consumed with his zeal for that law, converted from persecuting and killing the saints to a life of self-sacrifice and suffering persecutions for them, becoming a saint himself. This is how his understanding was changed by Jesus, and how he came to understand the law of the heart and putting on the righteousness of Christ, instead of the righteousness of flesh centered acts of piety that in themselves meant nothing if those doing them were focused on the deeds to the detriment of their relationship with God and their fellow man.

By Christ submitting to the destruction of his own flesh and pride (edit: not that pride was an issue with Jesus, but by example) through the scourging, lies, mockery and crucifixion, did fulfill the law and showed what it means to fulfill the law, out of love for God and our fellow man, to deny ourselves for the love of God and for the sake of others. Eating specific foods, wearing specific clothes, making incisions in our flesh are meaningless if we don’t have love for God and each other. St Paul’s writings are there to explain that ultimately the fulfillment of the law in ourselves is to keep these commandments of Christ.

It’s very difficult to sum up all of this because I feel like I’m pigeonholing Jesus’ sacrifice for us into a very narrow meaning, when what he did is so much greater, but this is merely an attempt to explain St Paul’s writings more clearly. I hope that has helped in some way, and if I made an error that someone would correct it.
 
Thank you Steven John. I thought before you that you may have found that quote(s) from a website that pieced them together in an unrelated manner in order to make a point, but you seem to be struggling with St Paul’s relationship to Jesus in regards to doctrine and the meaning of the coming of Christ.
Please do not thank me, if you ever perceive I do any good it is only God we need thank for none is good but He.

My questions have been spurred by Pentecostal and their relationship with Paul, in my eyes it had seemed many times like they wear t shirts saying i am 4 Paul rather than i walk in the way of Jesus.

B4 them i had no real interest in reading these letters, saw it as getting the good news second hand. Still do really, the clarity of the narrated words of Jesus (pbwh) are so awesome.

Most people i meet including most of the posts on many threads are only echoes of other mens words.

I am always very keen to hear what God brings directly from the heart of the prayerful reader.

Guess i better chase down Brother Sams links now and the view that inspired it. Maybe it will help me in my love of my Muslim Brothers not that i meet many that read the bible, shoot i dont find many that read the Quran.

Its like our Catholic parish i guess, we all say how important Gods word is but many don’t bother to read it.

May God bless and guide us all as we share together and aspire to submit unto Him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top