T
Thekla
Guest
Interesting how a news magazine is held to a higher standard than the government. They have to get it exactly right while the government is allowed to flop from version to version.It is hardly what Newsweek reported.
Interesting how a news magazine is held to a higher standard than the government. They have to get it exactly right while the government is allowed to flop from version to version.It is hardly what Newsweek reported.
What are you talking about? Newsweek was entirely wrong.Interesting how a news magazine is held to a higher standard than the government. They have to get it exactly right while the government is allowed to flop from version to version.
You must have missed the “splashed urine” part. The reason the Pentagon is dumping this on a Friday night is because they overacted on the Newsweek story with what I would call false outrage.
Hmmmm.
Would anyone care if the situation were reversed and Muslims were flushing the Bible? Would there be any outrage…???
Just wondering…
FOX? There’s a reliable source – NOT!!FOX just reported there were five cases of “book abuse” by guards at GITMO… PLUS there were FIFTEEN cases committed by GITMO detainees.
OK, will you believe CNN?FOX? There’s a reliable source – NOT!!
Even if true, does that justify the cases committed by the guards?
This news has the same source, whether reported by Fox or CNN or anybody else.FOX? There’s a reliable source – NOT!!
Even if true, does that justify the cases committed by the guards?
To me, the whole thing is fueled by hate, a noble Christian attribute. Some people hate the administration so much that they will publicize anything to try to discredit it, be it truths, half truths or out and out lies. There appears to be absolutely no concern about “collateral damage” unless it’s caused by the military.The problem as I see it, is that a number of people want all of the details published (very similar to the court action taking place now to force the publishing of more Abu Ghraib photos). These people relish in the announcement of every stupid thing ever done by a soldier. Despite the fact that in both cases, Gitmo and Abu Ghraib, investigations were being done prior to, and independant of , the story breaking in the press, people still feel the need for every detail to be made public. The problem is that those details incite the enemy. Those details make it more dangerous for our troups…lives are at more risk than before.
All of these stories, emails and reports are pieces; the question is are they pieces of a puzzle or random, isolated incidents? The fact that a guard urinated on a detainee is an incident that shouldn’t merit much outside attention. However, if that kind of abuse was encouraged or ignored by those in authority, then it’s part of a larger puzzle.Hardly what I would call rampent organized desecration of the Quran.
Yup, and the government was entirely truthful. That’s the ticket. You made Thekla’s point.What are you talking about? Newsweek was entirely wrong.
And some have come to these forums to fuel hate also and that is surprising. A reasonable debate on this forum should not lead to these type of arguments. I can see it in the mainstream of people because there are many that are not Catholic or Christian. Here, I find it rather disturbing. I have a grip, but am repeatedly given one line zingers to discredit my defense of our military.To me, the whole thing is fueled by hate, a noble Christian attribute. Some people hate the administration so much that they will publicize anything to try to discredit it, be it truths, half truths or out and out lies. There appears to be absolutely no concern about “collateral damage” unless it’s caused by the military.
“United We Stand” is more than just a slogan on a bumper sticker. People need to understand that war has been declared on us by a group that wears no uniforms, recognizes no national boundaries, no conventions of war, no treaties, and has absolutely no regard for human life. In my opinion, anything we do or say that helps their cause in any way whatsoever is, at the very least, irresponsible. This applies to the scared 18 year old who shoots when he shouldn’t and is appropriately punished by the military as well as to those who want to smear such information across the front page of every newspaper in the country. At least the kid has a reasonable excuse - he was scared. What kind of excuse can be made for those among us who aid the enemy’s recruiting by airing inflammatory material and, at the same time, endanger our troops and even our very nation? Is it politics before patriotism, pride, stupidity, hate, or what? It is something I truly do not understand.
I still don’t see your point. The government said they would investigate. They did, and they reported on their investigation. They were very up front.Yup, and the government was entirely truthful. That’s the ticket. You made Thekla’s point.
This isn’t an investigation that happened because of what Newsweek wrote, it was already going on. And yet they were so offended by such outlandish allegations; knowing full well that some of these things were already in the report.I still don’t see your point. The government said they would investigate. They did, and they reported on their investigation. They were very up front.